A funny companion: Distinct neural responses to perceived AI- versus human-generated humor

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10847v2
• Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 07:44:57 GMT
• Title: A funny companion: Distinct neural responses to perceived AI- versus human-generated humor
• Authors: Xiaohui Rao, Hanlin Wu, Zhenguang G. Cai,
• Abstract summary: This study used electroencephalography (EEG) to compare how people process humor from AI versus human sources.<n>Results: AI humor elicited a smaller N400 effect, suggesting reduced cognitive effort during the processing of incongruity.<n>These findings indicate that the brain responds to AI humor with surprisingly positive and intense reactions.
• Score: 2.859021383061256
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AI companions become capable of human-like communication, including telling jokes, understanding how people cognitively and emotionally respond to AI humor becomes increasingly important. This study used electroencephalography (EEG) to compare how people process humor from AI versus human sources. Behavioral analysis revealed that participants rated AI and human humor as comparably funny. However, neurophysiological data showed that AI humor elicited a smaller N400 effect, suggesting reduced cognitive effort during the processing of incongruity. This was accompanied by a larger Late Positive Potential (LPP), indicating a greater degree of surprise and emotional response. This enhanced LPP likely stems from the violation of low initial expectations regarding AI's comedic capabilities. Furthermore, a key temporal dynamic emerged: human humor showed habituation effects, marked by an increasing N400 and a decreasing LPP over time. In contrast, AI humor demonstrated increasing processing efficiency and emotional reward, with a decreasing N400 and an increasing LPP. This trajectory reveals how the brain can dynamically update its predictive model of AI capabilities. This process of cumulative reinforcement challenges "algorithm aversion" in humor, as it demonstrates how cognitive adaptation to AI's language patterns can lead to an intensified emotional reward. Additionally, participants' social attitudes toward AI modulated these neural responses, with higher perceived AI trustworthiness correlating with enhanced emotional engagement. These findings indicate that the brain responds to AI humor with surprisingly positive and intense reactions, highlighting humor's potential for fostering genuine engagement in human-AI social interaction.

Related papers

• When AI companions become witty: Can human brain recognize AI-generated irony? [2.859021383061256]
  This study investigates whether people adopt the intentional stance, attributing mental states to explain behavior,toward AI during irony comprehension.<n>We compared behavioral and neural responses to ironic statements from AI versus human sources.<n>Results demonstrate that people do not fully adopt the intentional stance toward AI-generated irony.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T05:15:00Z)
• What Neuroscience Can Teach AI About Learning in Continuously Changing Environments [6.3111399332851414]
  Animals constantly adapt to the ever-changing contingencies in their environments.<n>Can AI learn from neuroscience?<n>This Perspective explores this question, integrating the literature on continual and in-context learning in AI with the neuroscience of learning on behavioral tasks with shifting rules, reward probabilities, or outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T19:30:57Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Can Emulate Human Normative Judgments on Emotional Visual Scenes [0.09208007322096533]
  We study whether state-of-the-art multimodal systems can emulate human emotional ratings on a standardized set of images.<n>The AI judgements correlate surprisingly well with the average human ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:41:23Z)
• Empathetic Conversational Agents: Utilizing Neural and Physiological Signals for Enhanced Empathetic Interactions [18.8995194180207]
  Conversational agents (CAs) are revolutionizing human-computer interaction by evolving from text-based chatbots to empathetic digital humans (DHs) capable of rich emotional expressions.<n>This paper explores the integration of neural and physiological signals into the perception module of CAs to enhance empathetic interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T19:19:37Z)
• AI-Driven Agents with Prompts Designed for High Agreeableness Increase the Likelihood of Being Mistaken for a Human in the Turing Test [0.0]
  GPT agents with varying levels of agreeableness were tested in a Turing Test. All exceeded a 50% confusion rate, with the highly agreeable AI agent surpassing 60%. This agent was also recognized as exhibiting the most human-like traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T23:12:49Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• The Good, The Bad, and Why: Unveiling Emotions in Generative AI [73.94035652867618]
  We show that EmotionPrompt can boost the performance of AI models while EmotionAttack can hinder it. EmotionDecode reveals that AI models can comprehend emotional stimuli akin to the mechanism of dopamine in the human brain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T11:19:45Z)
• Chemist-X: Large Language Model-empowered Agent for Reaction Condition Recommendation in Chemical Synthesis [55.30328162764292]
  Chemist-X is a comprehensive AI agent that automates the reaction condition optimization (RCO) task in chemical synthesis.<n>The agent uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology and AI-controlled wet-lab experiment executions.<n>Results of our automatic wet-lab experiments, achieved by fully LLM-supervised end-to-end operation with no human in the lope, prove Chemist-X's ability in self-driving laboratories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T01:21:33Z)
• The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand" [81.89252713236746]
  Recent wave of generative AI has sparked excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence. At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans. This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T18:07:07Z)
• Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap [56.611702960809644]
  We benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks and three vision tasks.<n>Next, we conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges.<n>Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T16:16:52Z)
• Disambiguating Affective Stimulus Associations for Robot Perception and Dialogue [67.89143112645556]
  We provide a NICO robot with the ability to learn the associations between a perceived auditory stimulus and an emotional expression. NICO is able to do this for both individual subjects and specific stimuli, with the aid of an emotion-driven dialogue system. The robot is then able to use this information to determine a subject's enjoyment of perceived auditory stimuli in a real HRI scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T20:55:48Z)
• Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human Intentions [46.87576410532481]
  We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise. Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions. Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.