Related papers: A Human-centric Framework for Debating the Ethics of AI Consciousness Under Uncertainty

A Human-centric Framework for Debating the Ethics of AI Consciousness Under Uncertainty

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02544v1
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 09:15:01 GMT
Title: A Human-centric Framework for Debating the Ethics of AI Consciousness Under Uncertainty
Authors: Zhou Ziheng, Haiqiang Dai, Bin Ling, Ying Nian Wu, Demetri Terzopoulos,
Abstract summary: We present a structured three-level framework grounded in philosophical uncertainty.<n>We establish five factual determinations about AI consciousness alongside human-centralism as our meta-ethical stance.<n>Our approach balances philosophical rigor with practical guidance, distinguishes consciousness from anthropomorphism, and creates pathways for responsible evolution.
Score: 35.478378726992
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, questions about machine consciousness and its ethical implications have moved from fringe speculation to mainstream academic debate. Current ethical frameworks in this domain often implicitly rely on contested functionalist assumptions, prioritize speculative AI welfare over concrete human interests, and lack coherent theoretical foundations. We address these limitations through a structured three-level framework grounded in philosophical uncertainty. At the foundational level, we establish five factual determinations about AI consciousness alongside human-centralism as our meta-ethical stance. These foundations logically entail three operational principles: presumption of no consciousness (placing the burden of proof on consciousness claims), risk prudence (prioritizing human welfare under uncertainty), and transparent reasoning (enabling systematic evaluation and adaptation). At the application level, the third component of our framework, we derive default positions on pressing ethical questions through a transparent logical process where each position can be explicitly traced back to our foundational commitments. Our approach balances philosophical rigor with practical guidance, distinguishes consciousness from anthropomorphism, and creates pathways for responsible evolution as scientific understanding advances, providing a human-centric foundation for navigating these profound ethical challenges.

Related papers

Informed Consent for AI Consciousness Research: A Talmudic Framework for Graduated Protections [0.0]
Artificial intelligence research faces a critical ethical paradox: determining whether AI systems are conscious requires experiments that may harm entities whose moral status remains uncertain.<n>Recent work proposes avoiding consciousness-uncertain AI systems entirely, yet this faces practical limitations.<n>This paper addresses a gap in research ethics frameworks: how to conduct consciousness research on AI systems whose moral status cannot be definitively established.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T17:21:48Z)
AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [149.20033748212012]
This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
Perfect AI Mimicry and the Epistemology of Consciousness: A Solipsistic Dilemma [2.5672176409865677]
Advances in artificial intelligence require a re-examination of the foundations upon which we attribute consciousness.<n>As AI systems increasingly mimic human behavior and interaction with high fidelity, the concept of a "perfect mimic"-an entity empirically indistinguishable from a human-shifts from hypothetical to technologically plausible.<n>This paper argues that such developments pose a fundamental challenge to the consistency of our mind-recognition practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T08:44:55Z)
The Principles of Human-like Conscious Machine [6.159611238789419]
We propose a substrate-independent, logically rigorous, and counterfeit-resistant sufficiency criterion for phenomenal consciousness.<n>We argue that any machine satisfying this criterion should be regarded as conscious with at least the same level of confidence with which we attribute consciousness to other humans.<n>We show that humans themselves can be viewed as machines that satisfy this framework and its principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-21T01:11:30Z)
Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
The AI Ethical Resonance Hypothesis: The Possibility of Discovering Moral Meta-Patterns in AI Systems [0.0]
The paper proposes that advanced AI systems may emerge with the ability to identify subtle moral patterns that are invisible to the human mind.<n>The paper explores the possibility that by processing and synthesizing large amounts of ethical contexts, AI systems may discover moral meta-patterns that transcend cultural, historical, and individual biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-13T08:28:06Z)
Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [51.85131234265026]
I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation [22.921683578188645]
We argue that attaining truly trustworthy AI concerns the trustworthiness of all processes and actors that are part of the system's life cycle. A more holistic vision contemplates four essential axes: the global principles for ethical use and development of AI-based systems, a philosophical take on AI ethics, and a risk-based approach to AI regulation. Our multidisciplinary vision of trustworthy AI culminates in a debate on the diverging views published lately about the future of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T09:49:53Z)
Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.