Phase-Adaptive LLM Framework with Multi-Stage Validation for Construction Robot Task Allocation: A Systematic Benchmark Against Traditional Optimization Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02810v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:23:36 GMT
• Title: Phase-Adaptive LLM Framework with Multi-Stage Validation for Construction Robot Task Allocation: A Systematic Benchmark Against Traditional Optimization Algorithms
• Authors: Shyam prasad reddy Kaitha, Hongrui Yu,
• Abstract summary: This research introduces the LangGraph-based Task Allocation Agent (LTAA)<n>LTAA integrates phase-adaptive allocation strategies, multi-stage validation with hierarchical retries, and dynamic prompting for efficient robot coordination.<n>LTAA achieves major computational gains reducing token usage by 94.6% and allocation time by 86%.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-robot task allocation in construction automation has traditionally relied on optimization methods such as Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning. This research introduces the LangGraph-based Task Allocation Agent (LTAA), an LLM-driven framework that integrates phase-adaptive allocation strategies, multi-stage validation with hierarchical retries, and dynamic prompting for efficient robot coordination. Although recent LLM approaches show potential for construction robotics, they largely lack rigorous validation and benchmarking against established algorithms. This paper presents the first systematic comparison of LLM-based task allocation with traditional methods in construction scenarios.The study validates LLM feasibility through SMART-LLM replication and addresses implementation challenges using a Self-Corrective Agent Architecture. LTAA leverages natural-language reasoning combined with structured validation mechanisms, achieving major computational gains reducing token usage by 94.6% and allocation time by 86% through dynamic prompting. The framework adjusts its strategy across phases: emphasizing execution feasibility early and workload balance in later allocations.The authors evaluate LTAA against Dynamic Programming, Q-learning, and Deep Q-Network (DQN) baselines using construction operations from the TEACh human-robot collaboration dataset. In the Heavy Excels setting, where robots have strong task specializations, LTAA achieves 77% task completion with superior workload balance, outperforming all traditional methods. These findings show that LLM-based reasoning with structured validation can match established optimization algorithms while offering additional advantages such as interpretability, adaptability, and the ability to update task logic without retraining.

Related papers

• SOCRATES: Simulation Optimization with Correlated Replicas and Adaptive Trajectory Evaluations [25.18297372152296]
  SOCRATES is a novel two-stage procedure that automates the design of tailored SO algorithms.<n>An ensemble of digital replicas of the real system is used as a testbed to evaluate a set of baseline SO algorithms.<n>An LLM acts as a meta-optimizer, analyzing the performance trajectories of these algorithms to iteratively revise and compose a final, hybrid optimization schedule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T19:57:38Z)
• ELHPlan: Efficient Long-Horizon Task Planning for Multi-Agent Collaboration [25.45699736192177]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) enable intelligent multi-robot collaboration but face fundamental trade-offs.<n>We propose ELHPlan, a novel framework that introduces Action Chains--sequences of actions explicitly bound to sub-goal intentions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T03:15:56Z)
• Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
  Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z)
• VerifyLLM: LLM-Based Pre-Execution Task Plan Verification for Robots [44.99833362998488]
  We propose an architecture for automatically verifying high-level task plans before their execution in simulator or real-world environments.<n>The module uses the reasoning capabilities of the Large Language Models to evaluate logical coherence and identify potential gaps in the plan.<n>We contribute to improving the reliability and efficiency of task planning and addresses the critical need for robust pre-execution verification in autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T15:31:36Z)
• TreeLoRA: Efficient Continual Learning via Layer-Wise LoRAs Guided by a Hierarchical Gradient-Similarity Tree [52.44403214958304]
  In this paper, we introduce TreeLoRA, a novel approach that constructs layer-wise adapters by leveraging hierarchical gradient similarity.<n>To reduce the computational burden of task similarity estimation, we employ bandit techniques to develop an algorithm based on lower confidence bounds.<n> experiments on both vision transformers (ViTs) and large language models (LLMs) demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T05:25:35Z)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of LLM-Based Reasoning for Multiobjective HPC Job Scheduling [6.375075345747834]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based scheduler using ReAct-style framework (Reason + Act)<n>System incorporates a scratchpad memory to track scheduling history and refine decisions via natural language feedback.<n>We evaluate our approach using OpenAI's O4-Mini and Anthropic's Claude 3.7 across seven real-world HPC workload scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T14:25:29Z)
• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude: Adaptive Reasoning for Mathematical Problem Solving [55.895917967408586]
  Existing approaches to mathematical reasoning with large language models rely on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) for generalizability or Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) for precise computation.<n>We propose TATA (Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude), an adaptive framework that enables LLMs to personalize their reasoning strategy spontaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T16:56:23Z)
• MaCTG: Multi-Agent Collaborative Thought Graph for Automatic Programming [10.461509044478278]
  MaCTG (MultiAgent Collaborative Thought Graph) is a novel multi-agent framework that employs a dynamic graph structure.<n>It autonomously assigns agent roles based on programming requirements, dynamically refines task distribution, and systematically verifies and integrates project-level code.<n>MaCTG significantly reduced operational costs by 89.09% compared to existing multi-agent frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T01:52:15Z)
• Designing Algorithms Empowered by Language Models: An Analytical Framework, Case Studies, and Insights [86.06371692309972]
  This work presents an analytical framework for the design and analysis of large language models (LLMs)-based algorithms.<n>Our proposed framework serves as an attempt to mitigate such headaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T07:39:07Z)
• Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [68.29746557968107]
  We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans.<n> Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.