An AI Implementation Science Study to Improve Trustworthy Data in a Large Healthcare System
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03098v2
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 05:27:04 GMT
- Title: An AI Implementation Science Study to Improve Trustworthy Data in a Large Healthcare System
- Authors: Benoit L. Marteau, Andrew Hornback, Shaun Q. Tan, Christian Lowson, Jason Woloff, May D. Wang,
- Abstract summary: This study presents an AI implementation case study within Shriners Childrens (SCs), a large multisite pediatric system.<n>We introduce a Python-based data quality assessment tool compatible with SCs infrastructure, extending OHDsi's R/Java-based Data Quality Dashboard.<n>We also compare systematic and case-specific AI implementation strategies for Craniofacial Microsomia (CFM) using the FHIR standard.
- Score: 1.6881002551798014
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has sparked interest in Trustworthy AI and AI Implementation Science, both of which are essential for accelerating clinical adoption. However, strict regulations, gaps between research and clinical settings, and challenges in evaluating AI systems continue to hinder real-world implementation. This study presents an AI implementation case study within Shriners Childrens (SC), a large multisite pediatric system, showcasing the modernization of SCs Research Data Warehouse (RDW) to OMOP CDM v5.4 within a secure Microsoft Fabric environment. We introduce a Python-based data quality assessment tool compatible with SCs infrastructure, extending OHDsi's R/Java-based Data Quality Dashboard (DQD) and integrating Trustworthy AI principles using the METRIC framework. This extension enhances data quality evaluation by addressing informative missingness, redundancy, timeliness, and distributional consistency. We also compare systematic and case-specific AI implementation strategies for Craniofacial Microsomia (CFM) using the FHIR standard. Our contributions include a real-world evaluation of AI implementations, integration of Trustworthy AI principles into data quality assessment, and insights into hybrid implementation strategies that blend systematic infrastructure with use-case-driven approaches to advance AI in healthcare.
Related papers
- Federated Agentic AI for Wireless Networks: Fundamentals, Approaches, and Applications [60.721304295812445]
Federated learning (FL) has the potential to improve the overall loop of agentic AI.<n>We first summarize fundamentals of agentic AI and mainstream FL types. Then, we illustrate how each FL type can strengthen a specific component of agentic AI's loop.<n>We conduct a case study on using FRL to improve the performance of agentic AI's action decision in low-altitude wireless networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T11:26:56Z) - Let the Barbarians In: How AI Can Accelerate Systems Performance Research [80.43506848683633]
We term this iterative cycle of generation, evaluation, and refinement AI-Driven Research for Systems.<n>We demonstrate that ADRS-generated solutions can match or even outperform human state-of-the-art designs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-16T18:51:23Z) - SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z) - What is Implementation Science; and Why It Matters for Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Innovation-to-Application Gap in Medical Imaging [0.8969078296493108]
Implementation science (IS) may provide a framework to bridge the gap between AI development and real-world clinical imaging use.<n>We outline challenges specific to AI adoption in medical Imaging (MI)<n>We highlight the complementary roles of effectiveness research and implementation research, emphasizing hybrid study designs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-14T21:50:31Z) - The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey [58.50944604905037]
Edge-cloud collaborative computing (ECCC) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for addressing the computational demands of modern intelligent applications.<n>Recent advancements in AI, particularly deep learning and large language models (LLMs), have dramatically enhanced the capabilities of these distributed systems.<n>This survey provides a structured tutorial on fundamental architectures, enabling technologies, and emerging applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-03T13:55:38Z) - VirtualXAI: A User-Centric Framework for Explainability Assessment Leveraging GPT-Generated Personas [0.07499722271664146]
The demand for eXplainable AI (XAI) has increased to enhance the interpretability, transparency, and trustworthiness of AI models.<n>We propose a framework that integrates quantitative benchmarking with qualitative user assessments through virtual personas.<n>This yields an estimated XAI score and provides tailored recommendations for both the optimal AI model and the XAI method for a given scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T09:44:18Z) - Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems [5.010570270212569]
The chapter emphasizes that creating trustworthy AI systems in healthcare requires careful consideration of fairness, explainability, and privacy.<n>The challenge of ensuring equitable healthcare delivery through AI is stressed, discussing methods to identify and mitigate bias in clinical predictive models.<n>The discussion advances in an analysis of privacy vulnerabilities in medical AI systems, from data leakage in deep learning models to sophisticated attacks against model explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-16T16:17:39Z) - AI Benchmarks and Datasets for LLM Evaluation [0.46960837342692324]
The EU AI Act citeEUAIAct by the European Parliament on March 13, 2024, establishes the first comprehensive EU-wide requirements for the development, deployment, and use of AI systems.<n>It highlights the need to enrich this methodology with practical benchmarks to effectively address the technical challenges posed by AI systems.<n>We have launched a project that is part of the AI Safety Bulgaria initiatives citeAI_Safety_Bulgaria, aimed at collecting and categorizing AI benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T00:38:57Z) - Systematic Literature Review of AI-enabled Spectrum Management in 6G and Future Networks [29.38890315823053]
There's a gap in consolidating AI-enabled Spectrum Management advancements.
Traditional spectrum management methods are inadequate for 6G due to its dynamic and complex demands.
Findings reveal challenges such as under-explored AI usage in critical AISM systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T11:31:42Z) - MedPerf: Open Benchmarking Platform for Medical Artificial Intelligence
using Federated Evaluation [110.31526448744096]
We argue that unlocking this potential requires a systematic way to measure the performance of medical AI models on large-scale heterogeneous data.
We are building MedPerf, an open framework for benchmarking machine learning in the medical domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-29T18:09:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.