Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios Using Concordia

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03318v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:11:05 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios Using Concordia
• Authors: Chandler Smith, Marwa Abdulhai, Manfred Diaz, Marko Tesic, Rakshit S. Trivedi, Alexander Sasha Vezhnevets, Lewis Hammond, Jesse Clifton, Minsuk Chang, Edgar A. Duéñez-Guzmán, John P. Agapiou, Jayd Matyas, Danny Karmon, Akash Kundu, Aliaksei Korshuk, Ananya Ananya, Arrasy Rahman, Avinaash Anand Kulandaivel, Bain McHale, Beining Zhang, Buyantuev Alexander, Carlos Saith Rodriguez Rojas, Caroline Wang, Chetan Talele, Chenao Liu, Chichen Lin, Diana Riazi, Di Yang Shi, Emanuel Tewolde, Elizaveta Tennant, Fangwei Zhong, Fuyang Cui, Gang Zhao, Gema Parreño Piqueras, Hyeonggeun Yun, Ilya Makarov, Jiaxun Cui, Jebish Purbey, Jim Dilkes, Jord Nguyen, Lingyun Xiao, Luis Felipe Giraldo, Manuela Chacon-Chamorro, Manuel Sebastian Rios Beltran, Marta Emili García Segura, Mengmeng Wang, Mogtaba Alim, Nicanor Quijano, Nico Schiavone, Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Oswaldo Peña, Peter Stone, Ram Mohan Rao Kadiyala, Rolando Fernandez, Ruben Manrique, Sunjia Lu, Sheila A. McIlraith, Shamika Dhuri, Shuqing Shi, Siddhant Gupta, Sneheel Sarangi, Sriram Ganapathi Subramanian, Taehun Cha, Toryn Q. Klassen, Wenming Tu, Weijian Fan, Wu Ruiyang, Xue Feng, Yali Du, Yang Liu, Yiding Wang, Yipeng Kang, Yoonchang Sung, Yuxuan Chen, Zhaowei Zhang, Zhihan Wang, Zhiqiang Wu, Ziang Chen, Zilong Zheng, Zixia Jia, Ziyan Wang, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Natasha Jaques, Tim Baarslag, Jose Hernandez-Orallo, Joel Z. Leibo,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for social interaction.<n>Existing evaluation methods fail to measure how well these capabilities generalize to novel social situations.<n>We present empirical results from the NeurIPS 2024 Concordia Contest, where agents were evaluated on their ability to achieve mutual gains.
• Score: 100.74015791021044
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for social interaction and are increasingly being deployed in situations where they might engage with both human and artificial agents. These interactions represent a critical frontier for LLM-based agents, yet existing evaluation methods fail to measure how well these capabilities generalize to novel social situations. In this paper, we introduce a method for evaluating the ability of LLM-based agents to cooperate in zero-shot, mixed-motive environments using Concordia, a natural language multi-agent simulation environment. Our method measures general cooperative intelligence by testing an agent's ability to identify and exploit opportunities for mutual gain across diverse partners and contexts. We present empirical results from the NeurIPS 2024 Concordia Contest, where agents were evaluated on their ability to achieve mutual gains across a suite of diverse scenarios ranging from negotiation to collective action problems. Our findings reveal significant gaps between current agent capabilities and the robust generalization required for reliable cooperation, particularly in scenarios demanding persuasion and norm enforcement.

Related papers

• The Social Laboratory: A Psychometric Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation [0.16921396880325779]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework that uses multi-agent debate as a controlled "social laboratory"<n>We show that assigned personas induce stable, measurable psychometric profiles, particularly in cognitive effort.<n>This work provides a blueprint for a new class of dynamic, psychometrically grounded evaluation protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T07:10:28Z)
• Strategic Tradeoffs Between Humans and AI in Multi-Agent Bargaining [6.455342700410145]
  We compare outcomes and behavioral dynamics across humans, large language models, and Bayesian agents in a dynamic negotiation setting.<n>We find that performance parity can conceal fundamental differences in process and alignment.<n>This work provides a baseline for future studies in more applied, variable-rich environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T00:25:07Z)
• Advancing Language Multi-Agent Learning with Credit Re-Assignment for Interactive Environment Generalization [38.68388721203677]
  We propose CollabUIAgents, a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework with a novel multi-agent credit re-assignment strategy.<n>We show that our framework improves both performance and cross-environment generalizability of multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T12:26:15Z)
• Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [50.657070334404835]
  Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments.<n>We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions.<n>Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors [93.38830440346783]
  We propose a multi-agent framework framework that can collaboratively adjust its composition as a greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts system. Our experiments demonstrate that framework framework can effectively deploy multi-agent groups that outperform a single agent. In view of these behaviors, we discuss some possible strategies to leverage positive ones and mitigate negative ones for improving the collaborative potential of multi-agent groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:47:11Z)
• Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models [104.57849816689559]
  We address challenging multi-agent cooperation problems with decentralized control, raw sensory observations, costly communication, and multi-objective tasks instantiated in various embodied environments. We harness the commonsense knowledge, reasoning ability, language comprehension, and text generation prowess of LLMs and seamlessly incorporate them into a cognitive-inspired modular framework. Our experiments on C-WAH and TDW-MAT demonstrate that CoELA driven by GPT-4 can surpass strong planning-based methods and exhibit emergent effective communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T17:59:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.