Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03676v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 11:07:50 GMT
• Title: Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language models
• Authors: Daria Kryvosheieva, Andrea de Varda, Evelina Fedorenko, Greta Tuckute,
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether different syntactic phenomena recruit shared or distinct components in large language models.<n>Using a functional localization approach inspired by cognitive neuroscience, we identify the LLM units most responsive to 67 English syntactic phenomena.
• Score: 6.459078990392929
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can reliably distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical sentences, but how grammatical knowledge is represented within the models remains an open question. We investigate whether different syntactic phenomena recruit shared or distinct components in LLMs. Using a functional localization approach inspired by cognitive neuroscience, we identify the LLM units most responsive to 67 English syntactic phenomena in seven open-weight models. These units are consistently recruited across sentences containing the phenomena and causally support the models' syntactic performance. Critically, different types of syntactic agreement (e.g., subject-verb, anaphor, determiner-noun) recruit overlapping sets of units, suggesting that agreement constitutes a meaningful functional category for LLMs. This pattern holds in English, Russian, and Chinese; and further, in a cross-lingual analysis of 57 diverse languages, structurally more similar languages share more units for subject-verb agreement. Taken together, these findings reveal that syntactic agreement-a critical marker of syntactic dependencies-constitutes a meaningful category within LLMs' representational spaces.

Related papers

• IMPACT: Inflectional Morphology Probes Across Complex Typologies [0.0]
  IMPACT is a synthetically generated evaluation framework focused on inflectional morphology.<n>It is designed to evaluate performance across five morphologically rich languages: Arabic, Russian, Finnish, Turkish, and Hebrew.<n>We assess eight multilingual LLMs that, despite strong English performance, struggle with other languages and uncommon morphological patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:58:23Z)
• The Emergence of Abstract Thought in Large Language Models Beyond Any Language [95.50197866832772]
  Large language models (LLMs) function effectively across a diverse range of languages.<n>Preliminary studies observe that the hidden activations of LLMs often resemble English, even when responding to non-English prompts.<n>Recent results show strong multilingual performance, even surpassing English performance on specific tasks in other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T16:00:54Z)
• High-Dimensional Interlingual Representations of Large Language Models [65.77317753001954]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained on massive multilingual datasets hint at the formation of interlingual constructs.<n>We explore 31 diverse languages varying on their resource-levels, typologies, and geographical regions.<n>We find that multilingual LLMs exhibit inconsistent cross-lingual alignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T10:39:27Z)
• Tomato, Tomahto, Tomate: Measuring the Role of Shared Semantics among Subwords in Multilingual Language Models [88.07940818022468]
  We take an initial step on measuring the role of shared semantics among subwords in the encoder-only multilingual language models (mLMs) We form "semantic tokens" by merging the semantically similar subwords and their embeddings. inspections on the grouped subwords show that they exhibit a wide range of semantic similarities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T08:38:32Z)
• Exploring syntactic information in sentence embeddings through multilingual subject-verb agreement [1.4335183427838039]
  We take the approach of developing curated synthetic data on a large scale, with specific properties.<n>We use a new multiple-choice task and datasets, Blackbird Language Matrices, to focus on a specific grammatical structural phenomenon.<n>We show that despite having been trained on multilingual texts in a consistent manner, multilingual pretrained language models have language-specific differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T14:58:55Z)
• Evaluating Contextualized Representations of (Spanish) Ambiguous Words: A New Lexical Resource and Empirical Analysis [2.2530496464901106]
  We evaluate semantic representations of Spanish ambiguous nouns in context in a suite of Spanish-language monolingual and multilingual BERT-based models.<n>We find that various BERT-based LMs' contextualized semantic representations capture some variance in human judgments but fall short of the human benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:58:11Z)
• Probing LLMs for Joint Encoding of Linguistic Categories [10.988109020181563]
  We propose a framework for testing the joint encoding of linguistic categories in Large Language Models (LLMs) We find evidence of joint encoding both at the same (related part-of-speech (POS) classes) and different (POS classes and related syntactic dependency relations) levels of linguistic hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T12:46:40Z)
• Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds [59.71218039095155]
  We evaluate language understanding capacities on simple inference tasks that most humans find trivial. We target (i) grammatically-specified entailments, (ii) premises with evidential adverbs of uncertainty, and (iii) monotonicity entailments. The models exhibit moderate to low performance on these evaluation sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:41:09Z)
• The Better Your Syntax, the Better Your Semantics? Probing Pretrained Language Models for the English Comparative Correlative [7.03497683558609]
  Construction Grammar (CxG) is a paradigm from cognitive linguistics emphasising the connection between syntax and semantics. We present an investigation of their capability to classify and understand one of the most commonly studied constructions, the English comparative correlative (CC) Our results show that all three investigated PLMs are able to recognise the structure of the CC but fail to use its meaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T13:01:24Z)
• Discovering Representation Sprachbund For Multilingual Pre-Training [139.05668687865688]
  We generate language representation from multilingual pre-trained models and conduct linguistic analysis. We cluster all the target languages into multiple groups and name each group as a representation sprachbund. Experiments are conducted on cross-lingual benchmarks and significant improvements are achieved compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T09:32:06Z)
• Evaluating Transformer-Based Multilingual Text Classification [55.53547556060537]
  We argue that NLP tools perform unequally across languages with different syntactic and morphological structures. We calculate word order and morphological similarity indices to aid our empirical study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T03:34:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.