Towards Contextual Sensitive Data Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04120v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 09:01:36 GMT
• Title: Towards Contextual Sensitive Data Detection
• Authors: Liang Telkamp, Madelon Hulsebos,
• Abstract summary: We propose two mechanisms for contextual sensitive data detection.<n>Type contextualization first detects the semantic type of particular data values, then considers the overall context.<n>Second, we introduce domain contextualization which determines sensitivity of a given dataset in the broader context.
• Score: 2.4493299476776778
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of open data portals necessitates more attention to protecting sensitive data before datasets get published and exchanged. While an abundance of methods for suppressing sensitive data exist, the conceptualization of sensitive data and methods to detect it, focus particularly on personal data that, if disclosed, may be harmful or violate privacy. We observe the need for refining and broadening our definitions of sensitive data, and argue that the sensitivity of data depends on its context. Based on this definition, we introduce two mechanisms for contextual sensitive data detection that con- sider the broader context of a dataset at hand. First, we introduce type contextualization, which first detects the semantic type of particular data values, then considers the overall context of the data values within the dataset or document. Second, we introduce domain contextualization which determines sensitivity of a given dataset in the broader context based on the retrieval of relevant rules from documents that specify data sensitivity (e.g., data topic and geographic origin). Experiments with these mechanisms, assisted by large language models (LLMs), confirm that: 1) type-contextualization significantly reduces the number of false positives for type-based sensitive data detection and reaches a recall of 94% compared to 63% with commercial tools, and 2) domain-contextualization leveraging sensitivity rule retrieval is effective for context-grounded sensitive data detection in non-standard data domains such as humanitarian datasets. Evaluation with humanitarian data experts also reveals that context-grounded LLM explanations provide useful guidance in manual data auditing processes, improving consistency. We open-source mechanisms and annotated datasets for contextual sensitive data detection at https://github.com/trl-lab/sensitive-data-detection.

Related papers

• Bridging the Semantic Gap for Categorical Data Clustering via Large Language Models [64.58262227709842]
  ARISE (Attention-weighted Representation with Integrated Semantic Embeddings) is presented.<n>It builds semantic-aware representations that complement the metric space of categorical data for accurate clustering.<n>Experiments on eight benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over seven representative counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-03T11:37:46Z)
• How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy [52.00934156883483]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is a framework for reasoning about and limiting information leakage.<n>Differentially Private Synthetic data refers to synthetic data that preserves the overall trends of source data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T21:14:39Z)
• DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective [70.77570343385928]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy, classifying existing methods based on their reliance on internal features (IF) (inherent to the data) versus external features (EF) (artificially introduced for auditing)<n>We formulate two primary attack types: evasion attacks, designed to conceal the use of a dataset, and forgery attacks, intending to falsely implicate an unused dataset.<n>Building on the understanding of existing methods and attack objectives, we further propose systematic attack strategies: decoupling, removal, and detection for evasion; adversarial example-based methods for forgery.<n>Our benchmark, DATABench, comprises 17 evasion attacks, 5 forgery attacks, and 9
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:07:15Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• A Dataset for Semantic Segmentation in the Presence of Unknowns [49.795683850385956]
  Existing datasets allow evaluation of only knowns or unknowns - but not both.<n>We propose a novel anomaly segmentation dataset, ISSU, that features a diverse set of anomaly inputs from cluttered real-world environments.<n>The dataset is twice larger than existing anomaly segmentation datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T10:31:01Z)
• Approaching Metaheuristic Deep Learning Combos for Automated Data Mining [0.5419570023862531]
  This work proposes a means of combining meta-heuristic methods with conventional classifiers and neural networks in order to perform automated data mining. Experiments on the MNIST dataset for handwritten digit recognition were performed. It was empirically observed that using a ground truth labeled dataset's validation accuracy is inadequate for correcting labels of other previously unseen data instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T10:28:22Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning-Enabled Anonymization of OpenWiFi Data [9.492736565723892]
  Data privacy and protection through anonymization is a critical issue for network operators or data owners before it is forwarded for other possible use of data. OpenWiFi networks are vulnerable to any adversary who is trying to gain access or knowledge on traffic regardless of the knowledge possessed by data owners. CTGAN yields synthetic data; which disguises as actual data but fostering hidden acute information of actual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T04:59:03Z)
• Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarks [70.39633252935445]
  Data contamination has become prevalent and challenging with the rise of models pretrained on large automatically-crawled corpora. For closed models, the training data becomes a trade secret, and even for open models, it is not trivial to detect contamination. We propose three strategies that can make a difference: (1) Test data made public should be encrypted with a public key and licensed to disallow derivative distribution; (2) demand training exclusion controls from closed API holders, and protect your test data by refusing to evaluate without them; and (3) avoid data which appears with its solution on the internet, and release the web-page context of internet-derived
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T12:23:38Z)
• Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Auditing Data and Impact of Categorical Encodings [20.37092575427039]
  Vehicle Claims dataset consists of fraudulent insurance claims for automotive repairs. We tackle the common problem of missing benchmark datasets for anomaly detection. The dataset is evaluated on shallow and deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T14:33:17Z)
• Detection Hub: Unifying Object Detection Datasets via Query Adaptation on Language Embedding [137.3719377780593]
  A new design (named Detection Hub) is dataset-aware and category-aligned. It mitigates the dataset inconsistency and provides coherent guidance for the detector to learn across multiple datasets. The categories across datasets are semantically aligned into a unified space by replacing one-hot category representations with word embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T17:59:44Z)
• Anonymizing Sensor Data on the Edge: A Representation Learning and Transformation Approach [4.920145245773581]
  In this paper, we aim to examine the tradeoff between utility and privacy loss by learning low-dimensional representations that are useful for data obfuscation. We propose deterministic and probabilistic transformations in the latent space of a variational autoencoder to synthesize time series data. We show that it can anonymize data in real time on resource-constrained edge devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T22:32:30Z)
• Sensitive Information Detection: Recursive Neural Networks for Encoding Context [0.20305676256390928]
  Leak of sensitive information can potentially be very costly. We show that simplistic, brittle rule sets for detecting sensitive information only find a small fraction of the actual sensitive information. We develop a novel family of sensitive information detection approaches which only assumes access to labeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-25T07:49:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.