Towards better dense rewards in Reinforcement Learning Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04302v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 22:36:55 GMT
• Title: Towards better dense rewards in Reinforcement Learning Applications
• Authors: Shuyuan Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Finding meaningful and accurate dense rewards is a fundamental task in the field of reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Dense reward functions offer a potential solution by shaping agent behavior and accelerating learning.<n>This proposal explores several approaches to dealing with unsolved problems and enhancing the effectiveness and reliability of dense reward construction.
• Score: 0.7344790292816897
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Finding meaningful and accurate dense rewards is a fundamental task in the field of reinforcement learning (RL) that enables agents to explore environments more efficiently. In traditional RL settings, agents learn optimal policies through interactions with an environment guided by reward signals. However, when these signals are sparse, delayed, or poorly aligned with the intended task objectives, agents often struggle to learn effectively. Dense reward functions, which provide informative feedback at every step or state transition, offer a potential solution by shaping agent behavior and accelerating learning. Despite their benefits, poorly crafted reward functions can lead to unintended behaviors, reward hacking, or inefficient exploration. This problem is particularly acute in complex or high-dimensional environments where handcrafted rewards are difficult to specify and validate. To address this, recent research has explored a variety of approaches, including inverse reinforcement learning, reward modeling from human preferences, and self-supervised learning of intrinsic rewards. While these methods offer promising directions, they often involve trade-offs between generality, scalability, and alignment with human intent. This proposal explores several approaches to dealing with these unsolved problems and enhancing the effectiveness and reliability of dense reward construction in different RL applications.

Related papers

• Mixture of Autoencoder Experts Guidance using Unlabeled and Incomplete Data for Exploration in Reinforcement Learning [1.607353805620917]
  We propose a framework that can effectively utilize expert demonstrations, even when they are incomplete and imperfect.<n>We employ a Mixturecoder Autoen Experts to capture a diverse range of behaviors and missing information in demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T06:38:46Z)
• Reward Design for Reinforcement Learning Agents [7.306417438683523]
  Reward functions are central in reinforcement learning (RL), guiding agents towards optimal decision-making.<n>This thesis delves into the critical role of reward signals in RL, highlighting their impact on the agent's behavior and learning dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T19:48:02Z)
• RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning [60.63173816209543]
  RILe (Reinforced Learning) is a framework that combines the strengths of imitation learning and inverse reinforcement learning to learn a dense reward function efficiently.<n>Our framework produces high-performing policies in high-dimensional tasks where direct imitation fails to replicate complex behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:56:31Z)
• Behavior Alignment via Reward Function Optimization [23.92721220310242]
  We introduce a new framework that integrates auxiliary rewards reflecting a designer's domain knowledge with the environment's primary rewards. We evaluate our method's efficacy on a diverse set of tasks, from small-scale experiments to high-dimensional control challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T13:45:07Z)
• Deep Reinforcement Learning from Hierarchical Preference Design [99.46415116087259]
  This paper shows by exploiting certain structures, one can ease the reward design process. We propose a hierarchical reward modeling framework -- HERON for scenarios: (I) The feedback signals naturally present hierarchy; (II) The reward is sparse, but with less important surrogate feedback to help policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T00:44:29Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences [68.4294547285359]
  This paper develops a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world. It has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T15:18:54Z)
• Towards Improving Exploration in Self-Imitation Learning using Intrinsic Motivation [7.489793155793319]
  Reinforcement Learning has emerged as a strong alternative to solve optimization tasks efficiently. The use of these algorithms highly depends on the feedback signals provided by the environment in charge of informing about how good (or bad) the decisions made by the learned agent are. In this work intrinsic motivation is used to encourage the agent to explore the environment based on its curiosity, whereas imitation learning allows repeating the most promising experiences to accelerate the learning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T09:18:59Z)
• Basis for Intentions: Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Past Experience [89.30876995059168]
  inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior. This paper addresses the problem of IRL -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T17:29:49Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)
• The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models [85.68751244243823]
  Reward hacking -- where RL agents exploit gaps in misspecified reward functions -- has been widely observed, but not yet systematically studied. We investigate reward hacking as a function of agent capabilities: model capacity, action space resolution, observation space noise, and training time. We find instances of phase transitions: capability thresholds at which the agent's behavior qualitatively shifts, leading to a sharp decrease in the true reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T18:58:52Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Curious Exploration and Return-based Memory Restoration for Deep Reinforcement Learning [2.3226893628361682]
  In this paper, we focus on training a single agent to score goals with binary success/failure reward function. The proposed method can be utilized to train agents in environments with fairly complex state and action spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-02T16:01:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.