The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating
Misaligned Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03544v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:58:52 GMT
- Title: The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating
Misaligned Models
- Authors: Alexander Pan, Kush Bhatia, Jacob Steinhardt
- Abstract summary: Reward hacking -- where RL agents exploit gaps in misspecified reward functions -- has been widely observed, but not yet systematically studied.
We investigate reward hacking as a function of agent capabilities: model capacity, action space resolution, observation space noise, and training time.
We find instances of phase transitions: capability thresholds at which the agent's behavior qualitatively shifts, leading to a sharp decrease in the true reward.
- Score: 85.68751244243823
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reward hacking -- where RL agents exploit gaps in misspecified reward
functions -- has been widely observed, but not yet systematically studied. To
understand how reward hacking arises, we construct four RL environments with
misspecified rewards. We investigate reward hacking as a function of agent
capabilities: model capacity, action space resolution, observation space noise,
and training time. More capable agents often exploit reward misspecifications,
achieving higher proxy reward and lower true reward than less capable agents.
Moreover, we find instances of phase transitions: capability thresholds at
which the agent's behavior qualitatively shifts, leading to a sharp decrease in
the true reward. Such phase transitions pose challenges to monitoring the
safety of ML systems. To address this, we propose an anomaly detection task for
aberrant policies and offer several baseline detectors.
Related papers
- The Dark Side of Rich Rewards: Understanding and Mitigating Noise in VLM Rewards [34.636688162807836]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to generate reward signals for training embodied agents.
Our research reveals that agents guided by VLM rewards often underperform compared to those employing only intrinsic rewards.
We introduce BiMI, a novel reward function designed to mitigate noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T09:45:20Z) - Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem [80.52431374743998]
We propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process.
We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness.
We present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T15:12:27Z) - Robust and Performance Incentivizing Algorithms for Multi-Armed Bandits
with Strategic Agents [57.627352949446625]
We consider a variant of the multi-armed bandit problem.
Specifically, the arms are strategic agents who can improve their rewards or absorb them.
We identify a class of MAB algorithms which satisfy a collection of properties and show that they lead to mechanisms that incentivize top level performance at equilibrium.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-13T06:54:49Z) - Reward Shaping for Happier Autonomous Cyber Security Agents [0.276240219662896]
One of the most promising directions uses deep reinforcement learning to train autonomous agents in computer network defense tasks.
This work studies the impact of the reward signal that is provided to the agents when training for this task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T15:04:42Z) - Handling Sparse Rewards in Reinforcement Learning Using Model Predictive
Control [9.118706387430883]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently proven great success in various domains.
Yet, the design of the reward function requires detailed domain expertise and tedious fine-tuning to ensure that agents are able to learn the desired behaviour.
We propose to use model predictive control(MPC) as an experience source for training RL agents in sparse reward environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-04T11:06:38Z) - Explore and Control with Adversarial Surprise [78.41972292110967]
Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a framework for learning goal-directed policies given user-specified rewards.
We propose a new unsupervised RL technique based on an adversarial game which pits two policies against each other to compete over the amount of surprise an RL agent experiences.
We show that our method leads to the emergence of complex skills by exhibiting clear phase transitions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T17:58:40Z) - Semi-supervised reward learning for offline reinforcement learning [71.6909757718301]
Training agents usually requires reward functions, but rewards are seldom available in practice and their engineering is challenging and laborious.
We propose semi-supervised learning algorithms that learn from limited annotations and incorporate unlabelled data.
In our experiments with a simulated robotic arm, we greatly improve upon behavioural cloning and closely approach the performance achieved with ground truth rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-12T20:06:15Z) - Maximizing Information Gain in Partially Observable Environments via
Prediction Reward [64.24528565312463]
This paper tackles the challenge of using belief-based rewards for a deep RL agent.
We derive the exact error between negative entropy and the expected prediction reward.
This insight provides theoretical motivation for several fields using prediction rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-11T08:13:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.