Scenario-aware Uncertainty Quantification for Trajectory Prediction with Statistical Guarantees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05682v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 12:54:39 GMT
• Title: Scenario-aware Uncertainty Quantification for Trajectory Prediction with Statistical Guarantees
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel scenario-aware uncertainty quantification framework to provide the predicted trajectories with prediction intervals and reliability assessment.<n>We evaluated our framework using the real-world nuPlan dataset, demonstrating its effectiveness in scenario-aware uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment.
• Score: 16.41262478059784
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reliable uncertainty quantification in trajectory prediction is crucial for safety-critical autonomous driving systems, yet existing deep learning predictors lack uncertainty-aware frameworks adaptable to heterogeneous real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel scenario-aware uncertainty quantification framework to provide the predicted trajectories with prediction intervals and reliability assessment. To begin with, predicted trajectories from the trained predictor and their ground truth are projected onto the map-derived reference routes within the Frenet coordinate system. We then employ CopulaCPTS as the conformal calibration method to generate temporal prediction intervals for distinct scenarios as the uncertainty measure. Building upon this, within the proposed trajectory reliability discriminator (TRD), mean error and calibrated confidence intervals are synergistically analyzed to establish reliability models for different scenarios. Subsequently, the risk-aware discriminator leverages a joint risk model that integrates longitudinal and lateral prediction intervals within the Frenet coordinate to identify critical points. This enables segmentation of trajectories into reliable and unreliable segments, holding the advantage of informing downstream planning modules with actionable reliability results. We evaluated our framework using the real-world nuPlan dataset, demonstrating its effectiveness in scenario-aware uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment across diverse driving contexts.

Related papers

• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of In-Context Learning for Robust Measure of LLM Prediction Confidence [6.28866496877782]
  In-Context Learning (ICL) allows LLMs to adapt to new tasks from a few demonstrations, but its reliability remains a concern.<n>We introduce a concept of self-function vectors, built upon Bayesian views and the mechanistic interpretability of ICL.<n>These vectors leverage internal model representations to model the latent concept learned during in-context prompting.<n>We show that our proposed methodology can measure uncertainty of LLM predictions more reliably than existing alternative methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T09:47:40Z)
• Rethinking Gaussian Trajectory Predictors: Calibrated Uncertainty for Safe Planning [4.546517638153619]
  Existing trajectory predictors primarily rely on the Negative Log-Likelihood loss, which is prone to predict over- or under-confident distributions.<n>This paper introduces a novel loss function for calibrating prediction uncertainty.<n>We show that our method significantly improves the reliability of confidence levels predicted by different State-Of-The-Art Gaussian trajectory predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T04:42:49Z)
• Adaptive Conformal Prediction Intervals Over Trajectory Ensembles [50.31074512684758]
  Future trajectories play an important role across domains such as autonomous driving, hurricane forecasting, and epidemic modeling.<n>We propose a unified framework based on conformal prediction that transforms sampled trajectories into calibrated prediction intervals with theoretical coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T21:14:07Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
  This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z)
• Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
  We propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework.<n>We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z)
• CUQDS: Conformal Uncertainty Quantification under Distribution Shift for Trajectory Prediction [6.029850098632435]
  Trajectory prediction models can infer both finite future trajectories and their associated uncertainties in an online setting.<n>We propose the Conformal Uncertainty Quantification under Distribution Shift framework, CUQDS, to quantify the uncertainty of the predicted trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T21:25:36Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Lightweight, Uncertainty-Aware Conformalized Visual Odometry [2.429910016019183]
  Data-driven visual odometry (VO) is a critical subroutine for autonomous edge robotics. Emerging edge robotics devices like insect-scale drones and surgical robots lack a computationally efficient framework to estimate VO's predictive uncertainties. This paper presents a novel, lightweight, and statistically robust framework that leverages conformal inference (CI) to extract VO's uncertainty bands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T20:37:55Z)
• Uncertainty estimation of pedestrian future trajectory using Bayesian approximation [137.00426219455116]
  Under dynamic traffic scenarios, planning based on deterministic predictions is not trustworthy. The authors propose to quantify uncertainty during forecasting using approximation which deterministic approaches fail to capture. The effect of dropout weights and long-term prediction on future state uncertainty has been studied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T04:23:38Z)
• Learning Uncertainty For Safety-Oriented Semantic Segmentation In Autonomous Driving [77.39239190539871]
  We show how uncertainty estimation can be leveraged to enable safety critical image segmentation in autonomous driving. We introduce a new uncertainty measure based on disagreeing predictions as measured by a dissimilarity function. We show experimentally that our proposed approach is much less computationally intensive at inference time than competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T09:23:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.