The Adoption and Usage of AI Agents: Early Evidence from Perplexity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07828v2
• Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 16:34:43 GMT
• Title: The Adoption and Usage of AI Agents: Early Evidence from Perplexity
• Abstract summary: This paper presents the first large-scale field study of the adoption, usage intensity, and use cases of general-purpose AI agents.<n>Our analysis centers on Comet, an AI-powered browser developed by Perplexity, and its integrated agent, Comet Assistant.
• Score: 3.3745699838984144
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents the first large-scale field study of the adoption, usage intensity, and use cases of general-purpose AI agents operating in open-world web environments. Our analysis centers on Comet, an AI-powered browser developed by Perplexity, and its integrated agent, Comet Assistant. Drawing on hundreds of millions of anonymized user interactions, we address three fundamental questions: Who is using AI agents? How intensively are they using them? And what are they using them for? Our findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in adoption and usage across user segments. Earlier adopters, users in countries with higher GDP per capita and educational attainment, and individuals working in digital or knowledge-intensive sectors -- such as digital technology, academia, finance, marketing, and entrepreneurship -- are more likely to adopt or actively use the agent. To systematically characterize the substance of agent usage, we introduce a hierarchical agentic taxonomy that organizes use cases across three levels: topic, subtopic, and task. The two largest topics, Productivity & Workflow and Learning & Research, account for 57% of all agentic queries, while the two largest subtopics, Courses and Shopping for Goods, make up 22%. The top 10 out of 90 tasks represent 55% of queries. Personal use constitutes 55% of queries, while professional and educational contexts comprise 30% and 16%, respectively. In the short term, use cases exhibit strong stickiness, but over time users tend to shift toward more cognitively oriented topics. The diffusion of increasingly capable AI agents carries important implications for researchers, businesses, policymakers, and educators, inviting new lines of inquiry into this rapidly emerging class of AI capabilities.

Related papers

• Networked Intelligence: Active Shared Context Graphs for Human-AI Team Science [0.8754288080101668]
  We introduce Mycelium, an active shared workspace that automatically connects researchers and AI agents.<n>As human users and agents work, the system captures important observations and hypotheses, tracks how they relate to the team's evolving knowledge model.<n>We describe networked intelligence as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T19:29:16Z)
• Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales [118.2204632627895]
  SciAgentArena is a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios.<n>It comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents.<n>We find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T22:55:30Z)
• The Open Source Economic Index of AI Adoption and Capability [27.900759713490576]
  We work towards measuring both AI adoption and the capability of AI to perform discrete labor tasks across various occupations.<n>We develop an open-source economic index that uses publicly available user-LLM chat data and O*NET tasks to replicate studies produced by frontier AI labs.<n>We build a system that generates benchmark scenarios grounded in O*NET occupations, tasks, and model-context-protocol (MCP) servers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T18:45:42Z)
• SWE-chat: Coding Agent Interactions From Real Users in the Wild [70.18158706281724]
  SWE-chat is the first large-scale dataset of real coding agent sessions collected from open-source developers in the wild.<n>The dataset currently contains 6,000 sessions, comprising more than 63,000 user prompts and 355,000 agent tool calls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T17:08:19Z)
• AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite [75.58737079136942]
  We present AstaBench, a suite that provides the first holistic measure of agentic ability to perform scientific research.<n>Our suite comes with the first scientific research environment with production-grade search tools.<n>Our evaluation of 57 agents across 22 agent classes reveals several interesting findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:10:26Z)
• Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation [87.47155146067962]
  We provide a standardized evaluation harness that orchestrates parallel evaluations across hundreds of tasks.<n>We conduct three-dimensional analysis spanning models, scaffolds, and benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals surprising insights, such as higher reasoning effort reducing accuracy in the majority of runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:22:28Z)
• LIMI: Less is More for Agency [49.63355240818081]
  LIMI (Less Is More for Intelligent Agency) demonstrates that agency follows radically different development principles.<n>We show that sophisticated agentic intelligence can emerge from minimal but strategically curated demonstrations of autonomous behavior.<n>Our findings establish the Agency Efficiency Principle: machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T10:59:32Z)
• SciMaster: Towards General-Purpose Scientific AI Agents, Part I. X-Master as Foundation: Can We Lead on Humanity's Last Exam? [51.112225746095746]
  We introduce X-Master, a tool-augmented reasoning agent designed to emulate human researchers.<n>X-Masters sets a new state-of-the-art record on Humanity's Last Exam with a score of 32.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:50:52Z)
• Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Generative AI for Query Resolution and Analysis [1.0124625066746598]
  We introduce MASQRAD, a transformative framework for query resolution based on the actor-critic model.<n> MASQRAD is excellent at translating imprecise or ambiguous user inquiries into precise and actionable requests.<n> MASQRAD functions as a sophisticated multi-agent system but "masquerades" to users as a single AI entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T04:03:15Z)
• Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations [18.86239369192921]
  We leverage a recent privacy-preserving system to analyze over four million Claude.ai conversations.<n>Our analysis reveals that AI usage primarily concentrates in software development and writing tasks.<n>We also analyze how AI is being used for tasks, finding 57% of usage suggests augmentation of human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T00:46:43Z)
• The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
  This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user. We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z)
• One Agent Too Many: User Perspectives on Approaches to Multi-agent Conversational AI [10.825570464035872]
  We show that users have a significant preference for abstracting agent orchestration in both system usability and system performance. We demonstrate that this mode of interaction is able to provide quality responses that are rated within 1% of human-selected answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T17:30:57Z)
• The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey [91.71061158000953]
  Large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. We explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T17:12:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.