Multi-Agent Intelligence for Multidisciplinary Decision-Making in Gastrointestinal Oncology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08674v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 14:56:40 GMT
• Title: Multi-Agent Intelligence for Multidisciplinary Decision-Making in Gastrointestinal Oncology
• Abstract summary: A hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework is proposed, which emulates the collaborative workflow of a human Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)<n>The system attained a composite expert evaluation score of 4.60/5.00, thereby demonstrating a substantial improvement over the monolithic baseline.<n>The findings indicate that mimetic, agent-based collaboration provides a scalable, interpretable, and clinically robust paradigm for automated decision support in oncology.
• Score: 13.663415863327996
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal clinical reasoning in the field of gastrointestinal (GI) oncology necessitates the integrated interpretation of endoscopic imagery, radiological data, and biochemical markers. Despite the evident potential exhibited by Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), they frequently encounter challenges such as context dilution and hallucination when confronted with intricate, heterogeneous medical histories. In order to address these limitations, a hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework is proposed, which emulates the collaborative workflow of a human Multidisciplinary Team (MDT). The system attained a composite expert evaluation score of 4.60/5.00, thereby demonstrating a substantial improvement over the monolithic baseline. It is noteworthy that the agent-based architecture yielded the most substantial enhancements in reasoning logic and medical accuracy. The findings indicate that mimetic, agent-based collaboration provides a scalable, interpretable, and clinically robust paradigm for automated decision support in oncology.

Related papers

• Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
  CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z)
• MedReaMM: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Expert-Level Clinical Diagnostic Synthesis [61.266743965495884]
  We introduce MedReaMM, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to synthesize heterogeneous clinical evidence.<n>MedReaMM comprises 625 expert-validated cases with an average of 2.79 medical images per case and a total of 1,042 standardized diagnoses annotated with ICD-11 codes.<n>We evaluate 23 Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and find that most achieve diagnostic accuracy scores below 50%, underscoring a substantial gap in multimodal diagnostic synthesis capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T09:37:53Z)
• Dementia Etiology Diagnosis via Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement [81.27196033392559]
  We propose a Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement (COME) framework for dementia etiology diagnosis.<n>COME injects multi-center acquisition semantics, source identifiers, and modality indicators as heterogeneity-aware embeddings into a unified Transformer architecture for scale-up training.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art in-domain performance with a mean macro-averaged AUC of 85.62% and a 4.29-point gain over the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T04:26:47Z)
• MARCH: Multi-Agent Radiology Clinical Hierarchy for CT Report Generation [20.858060411945438]
  Automated 3D radiology report generation often suffers from clinical hallucinations and a lack of the iterative verification found in human practice.<n>We propose MARCH, a multi-agent framework that emulates the professional hierarchy of radiology departments and assigns specialized roles to distinct agents.<n>On the RadGenome-ChestCT dataset, MARCH significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both clinical fidelity and linguistic accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T15:42:03Z)
• MedCollab: Causal-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration for Full-Cycle Clinical Diagnosis via IBIS-Structured Argumentation [6.334763475104128]
  We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals.<n>The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T14:25:58Z)
• CoMMa: Contribution-Aware Medical Multi-Agents From A Game-Theoretic Perspective [17.875369977050926]
  We propose Contribution-Aware Medical Multi-Agents (CoMMa) to tackle oncology decision support tasks.<n>Specialists operate on partitioned evidence and coordinate through a game-theoretic objective for robust decision-making.<n> Evaluated on diverse oncology benchmarks, CoMMa achieves higher accuracy and more stable performance than data-centralized and role-based multi-agents baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T20:04:58Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
  Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z)
• A Knowledge-driven Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Enhancing Medical Decision-making [49.048767633316764]
  KAMAC is a knowledge-driven Adaptive Multi-Agent Collaboration framework.<n>It enables agents to dynamically form and expand expert teams based on the evolving diagnostic context.<n> Experiments on two real-world medical benchmarks demonstrate that KAMAC significantly outperforms both single-agent and advanced multi-agent methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T14:33:36Z)
• Automated Clinical Problem Detection from SOAP Notes using a Collaborative Multi-Agent LLM Architecture [8.072932739333309]
  We introduce a collaborative multi-agent system (MAS) that models a clinical consultation team to address this gap.<n>The system is tasked with identifying clinical problems by analyzing only the Subjective (S) and Objective (O) sections of SOAP notes.<n>A Manager agent orchestrates a dynamically assigned team of specialist agents who engage in a hierarchical, iterative debate to reach a consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T17:31:24Z)
• Tree-of-Reasoning: Towards Complex Medical Diagnosis via Multi-Agent Reasoning with Evidence Tree [14.013981070330153]
  We propose Tree-of-Reasoning (ToR), a novel multi-agent framework designed to handle complex scenarios.<n>Specifically, ToR introduces a tree structure that can clearly record the reasoning path of large language models (LLMs) and the corresponding clinical evidence.<n>At the same time, we propose a cross-validation mechanism to ensure the consistency of multi-agent decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T03:31:28Z)
• RadFabric: Agentic AI System with Reasoning Capability for Radiology [61.25593938175618]
  RadFabric is a multi agent, multimodal reasoning framework that unifies visual and textual analysis for comprehensive CXR interpretation.<n>System employs specialized CXR agents for pathology detection, an Anatomical Interpretation Agent to map visual findings to precise anatomical structures, and a Reasoning Agent powered by large multimodal reasoning models to synthesize visual, anatomical, and clinical data into transparent and evidence based diagnoses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T03:10:33Z)
• A Multimodal Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation [2.1477122604204433]
  Radiology report generation (RRG) aims to automatically produce diagnostic reports from medical images.<n>We propose a multimodal multi-agent framework for RRG that aligns with the stepwise clinical reasoning workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T20:28:04Z)
• m-KAILIN: Knowledge-Driven Agentic Scientific Corpus Distillation Framework for Biomedical Large Language Models Training [22.996230737442254]
  Corpus Heading for biomedical large language models (LLMs) seeks to address the pressing challenge of insufficient quantity and quality in open-source scientific corpora.<n>This paper proposes a knowledge-driven, agentic framework for scientific corpus distillation, tailored explicitly for LLM training in the biomedical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T08:18:24Z)
• TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis Framework Using Multi-Agent LLMs for Clinical Interviews [54.35097932763878]
  Thematic analysis (TA) is a widely used qualitative approach for uncovering latent meanings in unstructured text data.<n>Here, we propose TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis framework using Multi-Agent LLMs for clinical interviews.<n>We demonstrate that TAMA outperforms existing LLM-assisted TA approaches, achieving higher thematic hit rate, coverage, and distinctiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T15:58:16Z)
• Potential of Multimodal Large Language Models for Data Mining of Medical Images and Free-text Reports [51.45762396192655]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently transformed many domains, significantly affecting the medical field. Notably, Gemini-Vision-series (Gemini) and GPT-4-series (GPT-4) models have epitomized a paradigm shift in Artificial General Intelligence for computer vision. This study evaluated the performance of the Gemini, GPT-4, and 4 popular large models for an exhaustive evaluation across 14 medical imaging datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T09:08:42Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.