Causal inference and model explainability tools for retail

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12605v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 09:02:44 GMT
• Title: Causal inference and model explainability tools for retail
• Authors: Pranav Gupta, Nithin Surendran,
• Abstract summary: We aim to provide a recipe for applying model interpretability and causal inference for deriving sales insights.<n>We find that an inherently explainable model has a lower variance of SHAP values, and show that including multiple confounders through a double machine learning approach allows us to get the correct sign of causal effect.
• Score: 2.559284388053301
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Most major retailers today have multiple divisions focused on various aspects, such as marketing, supply chain, online customer experience, store customer experience, employee productivity, and vendor fulfillment. They also regularly collect data corresponding to all these aspects as dashboards and weekly/monthly/quarterly reports. Although several machine learning and statistical techniques have been in place to analyze and predict key metrics, such models typically lack interpretability. Moreover, such techniques also do not allow the validation or discovery of causal links. In this paper, we aim to provide a recipe for applying model interpretability and causal inference for deriving sales insights. In this paper, we review the existing literature on causal inference and interpretability in the context of problems in e-commerce and retail, and apply them to a real-world dataset. We find that an inherently explainable model has a lower variance of SHAP values, and show that including multiple confounders through a double machine learning approach allows us to get the correct sign of causal effect.

Related papers

• A Study of Data-driven Methods for Inventory Optimization [0.0]
  This paper shows a comprehensive analysis of three algorithms (Time Series, Random Forest (RF) and Deep Reinforcement Learning) into three inventory models.<n>The main purpose is to analyse efficient methods for the data-driven.<n>By comparing the results in each model, the effectiveness of each algorithm is evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T15:35:23Z)
• Fairness Hub Technical Briefs: Definition and Detection of Distribution Shift [0.5825410941577593]
  Distribution shift is a common situation in machine learning tasks, where the data used for training a model is different from the data the model is applied to in the real world. This brief focuses on the definition and detection of distribution shifts in educational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T05:29:36Z)
• Multimodal Deep Learning of Word-of-Mouth Text and Demographics to Predict Customer Rating: Handling Consumer Heterogeneity in Marketing [0.0]
  A number of consumers today usually post their evaluation on the specific product on the online platform. This study constructs a product evaluation model that takes into account consumer heterogeneity by multimodal learning of online product reviews and consumer profile information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:28:50Z)
• Robust Computer Vision in an Ever-Changing World: A Survey of Techniques for Tackling Distribution Shifts [20.17397328893533]
  AI applications are becoming increasingly visible to the general public. There is a notable gap between the theoretical assumptions researchers make about computer vision models and the reality those models face when deployed in the real world. One of the critical reasons for this gap is a challenging problem known as distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T23:40:12Z)
• Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data [62.43249746968616]
  Fairness-aware machine learning aims to eliminate biases of learning models against certain subgroups described by certain protected (sensitive) attributes such as race, gender, and age. A prerequisite for existing methods to achieve counterfactual fairness is the prior human knowledge of the causal model for the data. In this work, we address the problem of counterfactually fair prediction from observational data without given causal models by proposing a novel framework CLAIRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T04:08:29Z)
• Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning through the Lens of Data Drift [88.37640805363317]
  We show how to improve the fairness of Machine Learning models without altering the data or the learning algorithm. We use a simple but key insight: the divergence of trends between different populations, and, consecutively, between a learned model and minority populations, is analogous to data drift. We explore two strategies (model-splitting and reweighing) to resolve this drift, aiming to improve the overall conformance of models to the underlying data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T17:30:42Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Explainability for Multivariate Time Series [5.786452383826203]
  This study was to achieve and evaluate model agnostic explainability in a time series forecasting problem. The solution involved framing the problem as a time series forecasting problem to predict the sales deals. The explanations produced by LIME and SHAP greatly helped lay humans in understanding the predictions made by the machine learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T17:16:36Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.