Fairness Hub Technical Briefs: Definition and Detection of Distribution Shift

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14186v1
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 05:29:36 GMT
• Title: Fairness Hub Technical Briefs: Definition and Detection of Distribution Shift
• Authors: Nicolas Acevedo, Carmen Cortez, Chris Brooks, Rene Kizilcec, Renzhe Yu,
• Abstract summary: Distribution shift is a common situation in machine learning tasks, where the data used for training a model is different from the data the model is applied to in the real world. This brief focuses on the definition and detection of distribution shifts in educational settings.
• Score: 0.5825410941577593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Distribution shift is a common situation in machine learning tasks, where the data used for training a model is different from the data the model is applied to in the real world. This issue arises across multiple technical settings: from standard prediction tasks, to time-series forecasting, and to more recent applications of large language models (LLMs). This mismatch can lead to performance reductions, and can be related to a multiplicity of factors: sampling issues and non-representative data, changes in the environment or policies, or the emergence of previously unseen scenarios. This brief focuses on the definition and detection of distribution shifts in educational settings. We focus on standard prediction problems, where the task is to learn a model that takes in a series of input (predictors) $X=(x_1,x_2,...,x_m)$ and produces an output $Y=f(X)$.

Related papers

• Adaptive Test-Time Personalization for Federated Learning [51.25437606915392]
  We introduce a novel setting called test-time personalized federated learning (TTPFL) In TTPFL, clients locally adapt a global model in an unsupervised way without relying on any labeled data during test-time. We propose a novel algorithm called ATP to adaptively learn the adaptation rates for each module in the model from distribution shifts among source domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T20:42:47Z)
• SALUDA: Surface-based Automotive Lidar Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [62.889835139583965]
  We introduce an unsupervised auxiliary task of learning an implicit underlying surface representation simultaneously on source and target data. As both domains share the same latent representation, the model is forced to accommodate discrepancies between the two sources of data. Our experiments demonstrate that our method achieves a better performance than the current state of the art, both in real-to-real and synthetic-to-real scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T17:36:23Z)
• Explanation Shift: How Did the Distribution Shift Impact the Model? [23.403838118256907]
  We study how explanation characteristics shift when affected by distribution shifts. We analyze different types of distribution shifts using synthetic examples and real-world data sets. We release our methods in an open-source Python package, as well as the code used to reproduce our experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T17:13:01Z)
• Diagnosing Model Performance Under Distribution Shift [9.143551270841858]
  Prediction models can perform poorly when deployed to target distributions different from the training distribution. Our approach decomposes the performance drop into terms for 1) an increase in harder but frequently seen examples from training, 2) changes in the relationship between features and outcomes, and 3) poor performance on examples infrequent or unseen during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T15:27:16Z)
• Dataset Interfaces: Diagnosing Model Failures Using Controllable Counterfactual Generation [85.13934713535527]
  Distribution shift is a major source of failure for machine learning models. We introduce the notion of a dataset interface: a framework that, given an input dataset and a user-specified shift, returns instances that exhibit the desired shift. We demonstrate how applying this dataset interface to the ImageNet dataset enables studying model behavior across a diverse array of distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T18:56:26Z)
• Addressing Distribution Shift at Test Time in Pre-trained Language Models [3.655021726150369]
  State-of-the-art pre-trained language models (PLMs) outperform other models when applied to the majority of language processing tasks. PLMs have been found to degrade in performance under distribution shift. We present an approach that improves the performance of PLMs at test-time under distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T16:04:54Z)
• CAFA: Class-Aware Feature Alignment for Test-Time Adaptation [50.26963784271912]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to address this challenge by adapting a model to unlabeled data at test time. We propose a simple yet effective feature alignment loss, termed as Class-Aware Feature Alignment (CAFA), which simultaneously encourages a model to learn target representations in a class-discriminative manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T03:02:07Z)
• Mixture of basis for interpretable continual learning with distribution shifts [1.6114012813668934]
  Continual learning in environments with shifting data distributions is a challenging problem with several real-world applications. We propose a novel approach called mixture of Basismodels (MoB) for addressing this problem setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T22:53:15Z)
• Learning Neural Models for Natural Language Processing in the Face of Distributional Shift [10.990447273771592]
  The dominating NLP paradigm of training a strong neural predictor to perform one task on a specific dataset has led to state-of-the-art performance in a variety of applications. It builds upon the assumption that the data distribution is stationary, ie. that the data is sampled from a fixed distribution both at training and test time. This way of training is inconsistent with how we as humans are able to learn from and operate within a constantly changing stream of information. It is ill-adapted to real-world use cases where the data distribution is expected to shift over the course of a model's lifetime
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T14:29:20Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)
• WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts [157.53410583509924]
  Distribution shifts can substantially degrade the accuracy of machine learning systems deployed in the wild. We present WILDS, a curated collection of 8 benchmark datasets that reflect a diverse range of distribution shifts. We show that standard training results in substantially lower out-of-distribution than in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T11:14:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.