A Systematic Analysis of Higher Education on Software Engineering in the Netherlands
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12650v1
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 11:37:16 GMT
- Title: A Systematic Analysis of Higher Education on Software Engineering in the Netherlands
- Abstract summary: We leverage a crowd-sourced analysis process by considering 10 Dutch universities and 207 university courses.<n>Construction and Programming is the most covered knowledge area at Bachelor level.<n>We identify underrepresented areas, such as software engineering economics.
- Score: 5.647386383202981
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Software engineering educators strive to continuously improve their courses and programs. Understanding the current state of practice of software engineering higher education can empower educators to critically assess their courses, fine-tune them by benchmarking against observed practices, and ultimately enhance their curricula. In this study, we aim to provide an encompassing analysis of higher education on software engineering by considering the higher educational offering of an entire European country, namely the Netherlands. We leverage a crowd-sourced analysis process by considering 10 Dutch universities and 207 university courses. The courses are analysed via knowledge areas adopted from the SWEBOK. The mapping process is refined via homogenisation and internal consistency improvement phases, and is followed by a data analysis phase. Given its fundamental nature, Construction and Programming is the most covered knowledge area at Bachelor level. Other knowledge areas are equally covered at Bachelor and Master level (e.g., software engineering models), while more advanced ones are almost exclusively covered at Master level. We identify three clusters of tightly coupled knowledge areas: (i) requirements, architecture, and design, (ii) testing, verification, and security, and (iii) process-oriented and DevOps topics. Dutch universities generally cover all knowledge areas uniformly, with minor deviations reflecting institutional research strengths. Our results highlight correlations among key knowledge areas and their potential for enhancing integrated learning. We also identify underrepresented areas, such as software engineering economics, which educators may consider including in curricula. We invite researchers to use our research method in their own geographical region, in order to contrast software engineering education programs across the globe.
Related papers
- Program-Level Curriculum Analysis of U.S. Quantum Masters Degrees; Implications for Workforce Preparation [0.0]
Quantum technologies are increasingly recognized as a strategic priority for economic competitiveness, national security, and technological innovation in the United States.<n>As quantum systems transition from research prototypes to deployable technologies, attention has shifted toward the preparedness of the quantum workforce.<n>This study analyzes primary U.S. masters programs in quantum science and technology, focusing on curriculum structure and skill development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-30T18:32:07Z) - Reshaping Undergraduate Computer Science Education in the Generative AI Era [85.78707817763434]
Generative AI represents a turning point for Computer Science (CS) education.<n>To keep pace with advances in AI technology, CS curricula should consider a shift toward understanding and verifying AI-generated artifacts.<n>We believe that to effectively prepare future computer science graduates, capable of creating, solving problems, and managing, as well as co-creating, artifacts with AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T05:26:24Z) - Understanding the Skills Gap between Higher Education Institutions and the Software Engineering Industry [12.821098188224964]
This chapter investigates the technical skill and expertise gap between higher education institutions and the UK software engineering industry.<n>A custom web scraping and text analysis tool was developed to extract and categorise skills from 300 job postings and undergraduate curricula from 30 UK universities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-29T13:21:15Z) - LLMs4All: A Systematic Review of Large Language Models Across Academic Disciplines [60.559790988113775]
Large Language Models (LLMs) based applications such as ChatGPT have shown the capability of generating human-like conversation.<n>This paper will offer an overview of state-of-the-art LLMs and their integration into a wide range of academic disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-23T21:09:24Z) - Investigating Opportunities for Growth and Increased Diversity in Quantum Information Science and Engineering Education in the U.S. based on an Analysis of the Current Educational Landscape [2.9123029495753934]
Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) is rapidly gaining interest across a wide range of disciplines.<n>While efforts to characterize introductory QISE courses are underway, a comprehensive understanding of QISE education across the United States remains lacking.<n>This paper presents part of an ongoing effort to characterize the current landscape of QISE courses and degree programs in higher education in the US.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-30T18:18:01Z) - LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications [49.3663528354802]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in automating tasks and driving innovation across diverse educational applications.<n>This survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological overview of LLM agents for education, fostering further research and collaboration to enhance their impact for the greater good of learners and educators alike.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-14T11:53:44Z) - Challenges and Opportunities: Implementing Diversity and Inclusion in Software Engineering University Level Education in Finland [2.2843885788439797]
This study investigates the current state of diversity and inclusion in software engineering education and faculties in Finland.
An online survey was conducted among Finnish software engineering university teachers.
It was researched how software engineering teachers perceive the importance of D&I in their courses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-05T18:23:03Z) - Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [176.39275404745098]
We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions.<n>GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions.<n>Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z) - A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Machine Learning in Software Engineering [0.0]
The study was carried out following the objective and the research questions to explore the current state of the art in applying machine learning techniques in software engineering processes.
The review identifies the key areas within software engineering where ML has been applied, including software quality assurance, software maintenance, software comprehension, and software documentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T23:04:27Z) - Comparative Analysis Vision of Worldwide AI Courses [11.231658712906878]
This research delves into the diverse course structures of leading universities, exploring contemporary trends and priorities to reveal the nuanced approaches in AI education.
It also investigates the core AI topics and learning contents frequently taught, comparing them with the CS2023 curriculum guidance to identify convergence and divergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T03:53:57Z) - Multi-source Education Knowledge Graph Construction and Fusion for
College Curricula [3.981835878719391]
We propose an automated framework for knowledge extraction, visual KG construction, and graph fusion for the major of Electronic Information.
Our objective is to enhance the learning efficiency of students and to explore new educational paradigms enabled by AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T09:25:41Z) - An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence
Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z) - Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education.
A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum.
The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z) - Machine Learning for Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping [73.30245214374027]
The software development industry is rapidly adopting machine learning for transitioning modern day software systems towards highly intelligent and self-learning systems.
No comprehensive study exists that explores the current state-of-the-art on the adoption of machine learning across software engineering life cycle stages.
This study introduces a machine learning for software engineering (MLSE) taxonomy classifying the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques according to their applicability to various software engineering life cycle stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T11:56:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.