Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Robust Multilingual Document Question Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12694v1
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 13:57:05 GMT
- Title: Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Robust Multilingual Document Question Answering
- Authors: Anthony Mudet, Souhail Bakkali,
- Abstract summary: Large-scale digitization initiatives have unlocked massive collections of historical newspapers.<n>We develop and evaluate a multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline specifically designed for question answering on noisy historical documents.
- Score: 0.3376269351435395
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large-scale digitization initiatives have unlocked massive collections of historical newspapers, yet effective computational access remains hindered by OCR corruption, multilingual orthographic variation, and temporal language drift. We develop and evaluate a multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline specifically designed for question answering on noisy historical documents. Our approach integrates: (i) semantic query expansion and multi-query fusion using Reciprocal Rank Fusion to improve retrieval robustness against vocabulary mismatch; (ii) a carefully engineered generation prompt that enforces strict grounding in retrieved evidence and explicit abstention when evidence is insufficient; and (iii) a modular architecture enabling systematic component evaluation. We conduct comprehensive ablation studies on Named Entity Recognition and embedding model selection, demonstrating the importance of syntactic coherence in entity extraction and balanced performance-efficiency trade-offs in dense retrieval. Our end-to-end evaluation framework shows that the pipeline generates faithful answers for well-supported queries while correctly abstaining from unanswerable questions. The hybrid retrieval strategy improves recall stability, particularly benefiting from RRF's ability to smooth performance variance across query formulations. We release our code and configurations at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RAGs-C5AE/, providing a reproducible foundation for robust historical document question answering.
Related papers
- RouteRAG: Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation from Text and Graph via Reinforcement Learning [69.87510139069218]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates non-parametric knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent progress has advanced text-based RAG to multi-turn reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>We introduce model, an RL-based framework that enables LLMs to perform multi-turn and adaptive graph-text hybrid RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T10:05:31Z) - ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z) - Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z) - Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Two-Stage Retrieval: FlashRank Reranking and Query Expansion [0.0]
RAG couples a retriever with a large language model (LLM) to ground generated responses in external evidence.<n>We propose a two-stage retrieval pipeline that integrates LLM-driven query expansion to improve candidate recall.<n>FlashRank is a fast marginal-utility reranker that dynamically selects an optimal subset of evidence under a token budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T15:08:17Z) - Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z) - Test-time Corpus Feedback: From Retrieval to RAG [21.517949407443453]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a standard framework for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks.<n>Most RAG pipelines treat retrieval and reasoning as isolated components, retrieving documents once and then generating answers without further interaction.<n>Recent work in both the information retrieval (IR) and NLP communities has begun to close this gap by introducing adaptive retrieval and ranking methods that incorporate feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T10:57:38Z) - RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [33.389969814185214]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers.<n>Existing evaluations rarely test how well RAG systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts.<n>We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-test query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-01T02:42:36Z) - Cognitive-Aligned Document Selection for Retrieval-augmented Generation [2.9060210098040855]
We propose GGatrieval to dynamically update queries and filter high-quality, reliable retrieval documents.<n>We parse the user query into its syntactic components and perform fine-grained grounded alignment with the retrieved documents.<n>Our approach introduces a novel criterion for filtering retrieved documents, closely emulating human strategies for acquiring targeted information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T13:00:15Z) - Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation [36.04062963574603]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies heavily on relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong.
We propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation.
CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T04:36:39Z) - GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion.
The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z) - Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answering [134.27768711201202]
Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) for answering open-domain questions.
We show that generating diverse contexts for a query is beneficial as fusing their results consistently yields better retrieval accuracy.
GAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on Natural Questions and TriviaQA datasets under the extractive QA setup when equipped with an extractive reader.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-17T23:08:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.