Selective Conformal Risk Control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12844v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 21:18:28 GMT
• Title: Selective Conformal Risk Control
• Authors: Yunpeng Xu, Wenge Guo, Zhi Wei,
• Abstract summary: We propose textitSelective Conformal Risk Control (SCRC), a unified framework that integrates conformal prediction with selective classification.<n>The framework formulates uncertainty control as a two-stage problem: the first stage selects confident samples for prediction, and the second stage applies conformal risk control on the selected subset to construct calibrated prediction sets.<n>Experiments show that both methods achieve the target coverage and risk levels, with nearly identical performance, while SCRC-I exhibits slightly more conservative risk control but superior computational practicality.
• Score: 0.38106124526091323
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reliable uncertainty quantification is essential for deploying machine learning systems in high-stakes domains. Conformal prediction provides distribution-free coverage guarantees but often produces overly large prediction sets, limiting its practical utility. To address this issue, we propose \textit{Selective Conformal Risk Control} (SCRC), a unified framework that integrates conformal prediction with selective classification. The framework formulates uncertainty control as a two-stage problem: the first stage selects confident samples for prediction, and the second stage applies conformal risk control on the selected subset to construct calibrated prediction sets. We develop two algorithms under this framework. The first, SCRC-T, preserves exchangeability by computing thresholds jointly over calibration and test samples, offering exact finite-sample guarantees. The second, SCRC-I, is a calibration-only variant that provides PAC-style probabilistic guarantees while being more computational efficient. Experiments on two public datasets show that both methods achieve the target coverage and risk levels, with nearly identical performance, while SCRC-I exhibits slightly more conservative risk control but superior computational practicality. Our results demonstrate that selective conformal risk control offers an effective and efficient path toward compact, reliable uncertainty quantification.

Related papers

• LEC: Linear Expectation Constraints for False-Discovery Control in Selective Prediction and Routing Systems [95.35293543918762]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate unreliable answers, while uncertainty methods fail to fully distinguish correct from incorrect predictions.<n>We address this issue through the lens of false discovery rate (FDR) control, ensuring that among all accepted predictions, the proportion of errors does not exceed a target risk level.<n>We propose LEC, which reinterprets selective prediction as a constrained decision problem by enforcing a Linear Expectation Constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T11:27:09Z)
• SAFER: Risk-Constrained Sample-then-Filter in Large Language Models [38.97678256807034]
  We introduce a two-stage risk control framework comprising abstention-aware sampling and conformalized filtering.<n>We show that SAFER is compatible with various task-specific admission criteria and calibration-test split ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T12:12:41Z)
• Rectified Robust Policy Optimization for Model-Uncertain Constrained Reinforcement Learning without Strong Duality [53.525547349715595]
  We propose a novel primal-only algorithm called Rectified Robust Policy Optimization (RRPO)<n>RRPO operates directly on the primal problem without relying on dual formulations.<n>We show convergence to an approximately optimal feasible policy with complexity matching the best-known lower bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T16:59:38Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification.<n>We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains.<n>This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• Conditional Conformal Risk Adaptation [9.559062601251464]
  We develop a new score function for creating adaptive prediction sets that significantly improve conditional risk control for segmentation tasks.<n>We introduce a specialized probability calibration framework that enhances the reliability of pixel-wise inclusion estimates.<n>Our experiments on polyp segmentation demonstrate that all three methods provide valid marginal risk control and deliver more consistent conditional risk control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T10:01:06Z)
• Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage [53.74125453366155]
  We introduce an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise.<n>We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T23:55:23Z)
• Cross-Validation Conformal Risk Control [40.2365781482563]
  Conformal risk control (CRC) is a recently proposed technique that applies post-hoc to a conventional point predictor to provide calibration guarantees. In this paper, a novel CRC method is introduced that is based on cross-validation, rather than on validation as the original CRC. CV-CRC is proved to offer theoretical guarantees on the average risk of the set predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T14:26:02Z)
• Selective Classification via One-Sided Prediction [54.05407231648068]
  One-sided prediction (OSP) based relaxation yields an SC scheme that attains near-optimal coverage in the practically relevant high target accuracy regime. We theoretically derive bounds generalization for SC and OSP, and empirically we show that our scheme strongly outperforms state of the art methods in coverage at small error levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:14:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.