Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18060v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:55:23 GMT
- Title: Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage
- Authors: Teresa Bortolotti, Y. X. Rachel Wang, Xin Tong, Alessandra Menafoglio, Simone Vantini, Matteo Sesia,
- Abstract summary: We introduce an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise.
We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets.
- Score: 53.74125453366155
- License:
- Abstract: Conformal inference provides a rigorous statistical framework for uncertainty quantification in machine learning, enabling well-calibrated prediction sets with precise coverage guarantees for any classification model. However, its reliance on the idealized assumption of perfect data exchangeability limits its effectiveness in the presence of real-world complications, such as low-quality labels -- a widespread issue in modern large-scale data sets. This work tackles this open problem by introducing an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise, leading to informative prediction sets with tight marginal coverage guarantees even in those challenging scenarios. We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets, including CIFAR-10H and BigEarthNet.
Related papers
- Adaptive Conformal Inference by Betting [51.272991377903274]
We consider the problem of adaptive conformal inference without any assumptions about the data generating process.
Existing approaches for adaptive conformal inference are based on optimizing the pinball loss using variants of online gradient descent.
We propose a different approach for adaptive conformal inference that leverages parameter-free online convex optimization techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-26T18:42:08Z) - Automatically Adaptive Conformal Risk Control [49.95190019041905]
We propose a methodology for achieving approximate conditional control of statistical risks by adapting to the difficulty of test samples.
Our framework goes beyond traditional conditional risk control based on user-provided conditioning events to the algorithmic, data-driven determination of appropriate function classes for conditioning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T08:29:32Z) - The Penalized Inverse Probability Measure for Conformal Classification [0.5172964916120902]
The work introduces the Penalized Inverse Probability (PIP) nonconformity score, and its regularized version RePIP, that allow the joint optimization of both efficiency and informativeness.
The work shows how PIP-based conformal classifiers exhibit precisely the desired behavior in comparison with other nonconformity measures and strike a good balance between informativeness and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T07:37:16Z) - Conformal Classification with Equalized Coverage for Adaptively Selected Groups [9.016173836219524]
This paper introduces a conformal inference method to evaluate uncertainty in classification by generating prediction sets with valid coverage conditional on adaptively chosen features.
We demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of this method on simulated and real data sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T23:32:37Z) - Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample
Selection [82.43311784594384]
Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance.
We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z) - Efficient Conformal Prediction under Data Heterogeneity [79.35418041861327]
Conformal Prediction (CP) stands out as a robust framework for uncertainty quantification.
Existing approaches for tackling non-exchangeability lead to methods that are not computable beyond the simplest examples.
This work introduces a new efficient approach to CP that produces provably valid confidence sets for fairly general non-exchangeable data distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-25T20:02:51Z) - Binary Classification with Confidence Difference [100.08818204756093]
This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification.
We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound the optimal convergence rate.
We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T11:44:50Z) - Adaptive conformal classification with noisy labels [22.33857704379073]
The paper develops novel conformal prediction methods for classification tasks that can automatically adapt to random label contamination in the calibration sample.
This is made possible by a precise characterization of the effective coverage inflation suffered by standard conformal inferences in the presence of label contamination.
The advantages of the proposed methods are demonstrated through extensive simulations and an application to object classification with the CIFAR-10H image data set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-10T17:35:43Z) - Approximate Conditional Coverage via Neural Model Approximations [0.030458514384586396]
We analyze a data-driven procedure for obtaining empirically reliable approximate conditional coverage.
We demonstrate the potential for substantial (and otherwise unknowable) under-coverage with split-conformal alternatives with marginal coverage guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-28T02:59:05Z) - Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coverage [11.680355561258427]
Conformal inference, cross-validation+, and the jackknife+ are hold-out methods that can be combined with virtually any machine learning algorithm.
We develop specialized versions of these techniques for categorical and unordered response labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T21:42:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.