Challenges and Enablers: Remote Work for People with Disabilities in Software Development Teams
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12965v1
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 04:05:36 GMT
- Title: Challenges and Enablers: Remote Work for People with Disabilities in Software Development Teams
- Authors: Thayssa Rocha, Luciano Teran, Marcelle Mota, Cleidson de Souza, Kiev Gama, Gustavo Pinto,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates how remote work affects people with disabilities (PWDs) in software development teams (SDTs)<n>We conducted an online survey with totalSurveyResponses valid responses, encompassing PWDs, their leaders, and teammates.<n>We carried out 14 structured interviews with software developers who self-identified as having disabilities.<n>Results reveal that, despite the barriers faced by team members with disabilities, their teammates and leaders have a limited perception of the daily challenges involved in sustaining collaborative remote work.
- Score: 5.972661335921587
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The increasing adoption of remote and hybrid work modalities in the technology sector has brought new opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of people with disabilities (PWD) in software development teams (SDT). This study investigates how remote work affects PWDs' experience in mixed-ability SDT, focusing on the unique challenges and strategies that emerge in remote environments. We conducted an online survey with \totalSurveyResponses valid responses, encompassing PWD, their leaders, and teammates, to capture sociotechnical aspects of their experiences with remote collaboration. To deepen our understanding, we carried out 14 structured interviews with software developers who self-identified as having disabilities (six autistic individuals, six with physical disabilities, and two who are d/Deaf). Our analysis combines quantitative data with qualitative coding of open-ended survey responses and interview transcripts. The results reveal that, despite the barriers faced by team members with disabilities, their teammates and leaders have a limited perception of the daily challenges involved in sustaining collaborative remote work. These findings highlight opportunities for improvement in accessibility tools, communication strategies, and adaptive management approaches.
Related papers
- Embracing Trustworthy Brain-Agent Collaboration as Paradigm Extension for Intelligent Assistive Technologies [51.93721053301417]
This paper argues that the field is poised for a paradigm extension from Brain-Computer Interfaces to Brain-Agent Collaboration.<n>We emphasize reframing agents as active and collaborative partners for intelligent assistance rather than passive brain signal data processors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-25T00:25:45Z) - Inclusive Employment Pathways: Career Success Factors for Autistic Individuals in Software Engineering [0.0]
Autistic individuals often face barriers in Software Engineering roles due to a lack of personalised tools, complex work environments, non-inclusive recruitment practices, limited co-worker support, challenging social dynamics and so on.<n>Motivated by the ethical framework of the neurodiversity movement, the ICT sector has increasingly focused on autistic talent.<n>Despite this progress, there is no synthesis of knowledge reporting the full pathway from software engineering education through to sustainable workplace inclusion.<n>Our findings offer evidence-based recommendations for educational institutions, employers, organisations, and tool developers to enhance the inclusion of autistic individuals in SE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T10:19:14Z) - "Accessibility people, you go work on that thing of yours over there": Addressing Disability Inclusion in AI Product Organizations [15.672286378805234]
We report on an interview study with 25 AI practitioners about how their work processes and artifacts may impact end users with disabilities.<n>We found that practitioners experienced friction when triaging problems at the intersection of responsible AI and accessibility practices.<n>We offer suggestions for new resources and process changes to better support people with disabilities as end users of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T16:08:42Z) - Stakeholder Perspectives on Digital Twin Implementation Challenges in Healthcare: Insights from a Provider Digital Twin Case Study [0.0]
This research investigates DT implementation challenges in healthcare by capturing the perspectives of four distinct stakeholders.<n>We conducted semi-structured interviews guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0)<n>We then mapped each stakeholder group's preferences and concerns, revealing a nuanced landscape of converging and diverging perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T07:57:48Z) - I Felt Pressured to Give 100% All the Time: How Are Neurodivergent Professionals Being Included in Software Development Teams? [0.46873264197900916]
This study seeks to understand the work experiences of neurodivergent professionals acting in different software development roles.<n>We applied the Sociotechnical Theory (STS) to investigate how the social structures of organizations and their respective work technologies influence the inclusion of these professionals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T02:28:59Z) - Challenges in Human-Agent Communication [55.53932430345333]
We identify and analyze twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose.<n>These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication.<n>Our findings serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T01:21:26Z) - Constrained Human-AI Cooperation: An Inclusive Embodied Social Intelligence Challenge [47.74313897705183]
CHAIC is an inclusive embodied social intelligence challenge designed to test social perception and cooperation in embodied agents.<n>In CHAIC, the goal is for an embodied agent equipped with egocentric observations to assist a human who may be operating under physical constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T04:41:12Z) - Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluators [121.15880285283116]
This paper aims to evaluate the reasoning capacities of large language models (LLMs) in solving recent programming problems in Codeforces.
We first provide a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's peiceived zero-shot performance on this task, considering various aspects such as problems' release time, difficulties, and types of errors encountered.
Surprisingly, theThoughtived performance of GPT-4 has experienced a cliff like decline in problems after September 2021 consistently across all the difficulties and types of problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T18:58:57Z) - Building Emotional Support Chatbots in the Era of LLMs [64.06811786616471]
We introduce an innovative methodology that synthesizes human insights with the computational prowess of Large Language Models (LLMs)
By utilizing the in-context learning potential of ChatGPT, we generate an ExTensible Emotional Support dialogue dataset, named ExTES.
Following this, we deploy advanced tuning techniques on the LLaMA model, examining the impact of diverse training strategies, ultimately yielding an LLM meticulously optimized for emotional support interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-17T10:49:18Z) - Exploring Zero-Shot Emergent Communication in Embodied Multi-Agent
Populations [59.608216900601384]
We study agents that learn to communicate via actuating their joints in a 3D environment.
We show that under realistic assumptions, a non-uniform distribution of intents and a common-knowledge energy cost, these agents can find protocols that generalize to novel partners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-29T19:23:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.