The algorithmic muse and the public domain: Why copyrights legal philosophy precludes protection for generative AI outputs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13750v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 05:39:30 GMT
• Title: The algorithmic muse and the public domain: Why copyrights legal philosophy precludes protection for generative AI outputs
• Authors: Ezieddin Elmahjub,
• Abstract summary: Generative AI (GenAI) outputs are not copyrightable.<n>GenAI fundamentally severs the direct human creative link to expressive form.<n>The paper advocates for a clear distinction: human creative contributions to AI-generated works may warrant protection, but the raw algorithmic output should remain in the public domain.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) outputs are not copyrightable. This article argues why. We bypass conventional doctrinal analysis that focuses on black letter law notions of originality and authorship to re-evaluate copyright's foundational philosophy. GenAI fundamentally severs the direct human creative link to expressive form. Traditional theories utilitarian incentive, labor desert and personality fail to provide coherent justification for protection. The public domain constitutes the default baseline for intellectual creations. Those seeking copyright coverage for GenAI outputs bear the burden of proof. Granting copyright to raw GenAI outputs would not only be philosophically unsound but would also trigger an unprecedented enclosure of the digital commons, creating a legal quagmire and stifling future innovation. The paper advocates for a clear distinction: human creative contributions to AI-generated works may warrant protection, but the raw algorithmic output should remain in the public domain.

Related papers

• Open Shouldn't Mean Exempt: Open-Source Exceptionalism and Generative AI [1.8256490853231881]
  The paper critically examines prevalent justifications for "open-source exceptionalism"<n>The conclusion is that open-source developers must be held to the same legal and ethical standards as all other actors in the technological ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T18:21:06Z)
• Can Media Act as a Soft Regulator of Safe AI Development? A Game Theoretical Analysis [57.68073583427415]
  We study whether media coverage has the potential to push AI creators into the production of safe products.<n>Our results reveal that media is indeed able to foster cooperation between creators and users, but not always.<n>By shaping public perception and holding developers accountable, media emerges as a powerful soft regulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T12:13:34Z)
• Red Teaming for Generative AI, Report on a Copyright-Focused Exercise Completed in an Academic Medical Center [49.85176045690678]
  Generative artificial intelligence (AI) deployment in academic medical settings raises copyright compliance concerns.<n>Dana-Farber Cancer Institute implemented GPT4DFCI, an internal generative AI tool utilizing OpenAI models.<n>Four teams attempted to extract copyrighted content from GPT4DFCI across four domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T23:11:49Z)
• The Author Is Sovereign: A Manifesto for Ethical Copyright in the Age of AI [0.0]
  In the age of AI, authorship is being quietly eroded by algorithmic content scraping, legal gray zones like "fair use," and platforms that profit from creative labor without consent or compensation.<n>This short manifesto proposes a radical alternative: a system in which the author is sovereign of their intellectual domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T03:12:42Z)
• Unfair Learning: GenAI Exceptionalism and Copyright Law [1.8256490853231881]
  It argues that every legal and substantive argument favoring fair use for GenAI applies equally, if not more so, to humans.<n>It would mean no human would need to pay for virtually any copyright work again.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T16:49:39Z)
• Evaluating and Mitigating IP Infringement in Visual Generative AI [54.24196167576133]
  State-of-the-art visual generative models can generate content that bears a striking resemblance to characters protected by intellectual property rights. This happens when the input prompt contains the character's name or even just descriptive details about their characteristics. We develop a revised generation paradigm that can identify potentially infringing generated content and prevent IP infringement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T06:14:18Z)
• ©Plug-in Authorization for Human Content Copyright Protection in Text-to-Image Model [71.47762442337948]
  State-of-the-art models create high-quality content without crediting original creators.<n>We propose the copyright Plug-in Authorization framework, introducing three operations: addition, extraction, and combination.<n>Experiments in artist-style replication and cartoon IP recreation demonstrate copyright plug-ins' effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T07:48:00Z)
• Not All Similarities Are Created Equal: Leveraging Data-Driven Biases to Inform GenAI Copyright Disputes [20.237329910319293]
  This paper introduces a novel approach that leverages the learning capacity of GenAI models for copyright legal analysis. We propose a data-driven approach to identify the genericity of works created by GenAI. The potential implications of measuring expressive genericity for copyright law are profound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T13:32:32Z)
• Between Copyright and Computer Science: The Law and Ethics of Generative AI [1.534667887016089]
  Copyright and computer science continue to intersect and clash, but they can coexist. This Article shows that, contrary to some scholars' views, fair use law does not bless all ways that someone can gain access to copyrighted material. The copyright industry claims, however, that almost all uses of copyrighted material must be compensated, even for non-expressive uses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T16:20:44Z)
• Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
  Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code. The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns. This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z)
• A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
  Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z)
• Foundation Models and Fair Use [96.04664748698103]
  In the U.S. and other countries, copyrighted content may be used to build foundation models without incurring liability due to the fair use doctrine. In this work, we survey the potential risks of developing and deploying foundation models based on copyrighted content. We discuss technical mitigations that can help foundation models stay in line with fair use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:58:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.