Model-First Reasoning LLM Agents: Reducing Hallucinations through Explicit Problem Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14474v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 15:07:36 GMT
• Title: Model-First Reasoning LLM Agents: Reducing Hallucinations through Explicit Problem Modeling
• Authors: Annu Rana, Gaurav Kumar,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with complex multi-step planning tasks.<n>Existing strategies such as Chain-of-Thought and ReAct rely on implicit state tracking and lack an explicit problem representation.<n>We propose Model-First Reasoning (MFR), a two-phase paradigm in which the LLM first constructs an explicit model of the problem.
• Score: 3.537921035534423
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with complex multi-step planning tasks, showing high rates of constraint violations and inconsistent solutions. Existing strategies such as Chain-of-Thought and ReAct rely on implicit state tracking and lack an explicit problem representation. Inspired by classical AI planning, we propose Model-First Reasoning (MFR), a two-phase paradigm in which the LLM first constructs an explicit model of the problem, defining entities, state variables, actions, and constraints, before generating a solution plan. Across multiple planning domains, including medical scheduling, route planning, resource allocation, logic puzzles, and procedural synthesis, MFR reduces constraint violations and improves solution quality compared to Chain-of-Thought and ReAct. Ablation studies show that the explicit modeling phase is critical for these gains. Our results suggest that many LLM planning failures stem from representational deficiencies rather than reasoning limitations, highlighting explicit modeling as a key component for robust and interpretable AI agents. All prompts, evaluation procedures, and task datasets are documented to facilitate reproducibility.

Related papers

• LP-LLM: End-to-End Real-World Degraded License Plate Text Recognition via Large Multimodal Models [4.497411606350301]
  Real-world License Plate Recognition (LPR) faces significant challenges from severe degradations such as motion blur, low resolution, and complex illumination.<n>The prevailing "restoration-then-recognition" two-stage paradigm suffers from a fundamental flaw: the pixel-level optimization objectives of image restoration models are misaligned with the semantic goals of character recognition.<n>We propose an end-to-end structure-aware multimodal reasoning framework based on Qwen3-VL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T03:32:55Z)
• KBQA-R1: Reinforcing Large Language Models for Knowledge Base Question Answering [64.62317305868264]
  We present textbfKBQA-R1, a framework that shifts the paradigm from text imitation to interaction optimization via Reinforcement Learning.<n>Treating KBQA as a multi-turn decision process, our model learns to navigate the knowledge base using a list of actions.<n>Experiments on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQuestions demonstrate that KBQA-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T17:45:42Z)
• Think Then Embed: Generative Context Improves Multimodal Embedding [51.76690812535934]
  We propose a Think-Then-Embed (TTE) framework for Universal Multimodal Embeddings (UME), composed of a reasoner and an embedder.<n>By leveraging a powerful MLLM reasoner, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on the MMEB-V2 benchmark, surpassing proprietary models trained on massive in-house datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T16:53:56Z)
• Who Sees What? Structured Thought-Action Sequences for Epistemic Reasoning in LLMs [1.090218572228214]
  This study investigates the potential of structured examples to improve the performance of LLM-based agents within a ReAct framework.<n>We propose a structured solution-processing pipeline that generates three categories of examples: optimal goal paths (G-type), informative node paths (E-type) and step-by-step optimal decision sequences contrasting alternative actions (L-type)<n>While L-type examples slightly reduce clarification requests and overall action steps, they do not yield consistent improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T09:36:53Z)
• CausalPlan: Empowering Efficient LLM Multi-Agent Collaboration Through Causality-Driven Planning [25.322580535468013]
  CausalPlan is a framework that integrates explicit structural causal reasoning into the large language model (LLM) planning process.<n>We evaluate CausalPlan on the Overcooked-AI benchmark across five multi-agent coordination tasks and four LLMs of varying sizes.<n>Results show that CausalPlan consistently reduces invalid actions and improves collaboration in both AI-AI and human-AI settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T10:37:20Z)
• PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem Solving [66.42260489147617]
  We introduce PLAN-TUNING, a framework that distills synthetic task decompositions from large-scale language models.<n>Plan-TUNING fine-tunes smaller models via supervised and reinforcement-learning objectives to improve complex reasoning.<n>Our analysis demonstrates how planning trajectories improves complex reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:30:44Z)
• CRISP: Complex Reasoning with Interpretable Step-based Plans [15.656686375199921]
  We introduce CRISP (Complex Reasoning with Interpretable Step-based Plans), a dataset of high-level plans for mathematical reasoning and code generation.<n>We demonstrate that fine-tuning a small model on CRISP enables it to generate higher-quality plans than much larger models using few-shot prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T11:40:24Z)
• Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making. Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance. We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z)
• Deliberate Reasoning in Language Models as Structure-Aware Planning with an Accurate World Model [14.480267340831542]
  Structure-aware Planning with an Accurate World Model (SWAP)<n>SWAP integrates structured knowledge representation with learned planning.<n>We evaluate SWAP across diverse reasoning-intensive benchmarks including math reasoning, logical reasoning, and coding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:23:36Z)
• Unlocking Reasoning Potential in Large Langauge Models by Scaling Code-form Planning [94.76546523689113]
  We introduce CodePlan, a framework that generates and follows textcode-form plans -- pseudocode that outlines high-level, structured reasoning processes. CodePlan effectively captures the rich semantics and control flows inherent to sophisticated reasoning tasks. It achieves a 25.1% relative improvement compared with directly generating responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T04:13:58Z)
• Guiding Language Model Reasoning with Planning Tokens [122.43639723387516]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently attracted considerable interest for their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks. We propose a hierarchical generation scheme to encourage a more structural generation of chain-of-thought steps. Our approach requires a negligible increase in trainable parameters (0.001%) and can be applied through either full fine-tuning or a more parameter-efficient scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T13:29:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.