A Critical Perspective on Finite Sample Conformal Prediction Theory in Medical Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14727v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 16:59:31 GMT
• Title: A Critical Perspective on Finite Sample Conformal Prediction Theory in Medical Applications
• Authors: Klaus-Rudolf Kladny, Bernhard Schölkopf, Lisa Koch, Christian F. Baumgartner, Michael Muehlebach,
• Abstract summary: Conformal prediction (CP) is a popular tool that allows users to turn uncertainty estimates into uncertainty estimates with statistical guarantees.<n>We show that although statistical guarantees hold for calibration sets of arbitrary size, the practical utility of these guarantees does highly depend on the size of the calibration set.<n>This observation is relevant in medical domains because data is often scarce and obtaining large calibration sets is therefore infeasible.
• Score: 46.14968220063657
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning (ML) is transforming healthcare, but safe clinical decisions demand reliable uncertainty estimates that standard ML models fail to provide. Conformal prediction (CP) is a popular tool that allows users to turn heuristic uncertainty estimates into uncertainty estimates with statistical guarantees. CP works by converting predictions of a ML model, together with a calibration sample, into prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the true label with any desired probability. An often cited advantage is that CP theory holds for calibration samples of arbitrary size, suggesting that uncertainty estimates with practically meaningful statistical guarantees can be achieved even if only small calibration sets are available. We question this promise by showing that, although the statistical guarantees hold for calibration sets of arbitrary size, the practical utility of these guarantees does highly depend on the size of the calibration set. This observation is relevant in medical domains because data is often scarce and obtaining large calibration sets is therefore infeasible. We corroborate our critique in an empirical demonstration on a medical image classification task.

Related papers

• Reliable Statistical Guarantees for Conformal Predictors with Small Datasets [3.062618143970653]
  Surrogate models are capable of approximating arbitrarily complex input-output problems in science and engineering.<n>The standard approach for data-agnostic uncertainty quantification is to use conformal prediction (CP)<n>We propose a new statistical guarantee that offers probabilistic information for the coverage of a single conformal predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T08:29:17Z)
• Pitfalls of Conformal Predictions for Medical Image Classification [1.2289361708127877]
  Con conformal predictions can provide provable calibration guarantees.<n>Con conformal predictions are unreliable under distributional shifts in input and label variables.<n>In classification settings with a small number of classes, conformal predictions have limited practical value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T20:33:38Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification.<n>Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data.<n>We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• RR-CP: Reliable-Region-Based Conformal Prediction for Trustworthy Medical Image Classification [24.52922162675259]
  Conformal prediction (CP) generates a set of predictions for a given test sample. The size of the set indicates how certain the predictions are. We propose a new method called Reliable-Region-Based Conformal Prediction (RR-CP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T11:14:04Z)
• Improving Trustworthiness of AI Disease Severity Rating in Medical Imaging with Ordinal Conformal Prediction Sets [0.7734726150561088]
  A lack of statistically rigorous uncertainty quantification is a significant factor undermining trust in AI results. Recent developments in distribution-free uncertainty quantification present practical solutions for these issues. We demonstrate a technique for forming ordinal prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the correct stenosis severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T18:01:20Z)
• T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
  We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem. detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions. We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z)
• On the relationship between calibrated predictors and unbiased volume estimation [18.96093589337619]
  Machine learning driven medical image segmentation has become standard in medical image analysis. However, deep learning models are prone to overconfident predictions. This has led to a renewed focus on calibrated predictions in the medical imaging and broader machine learning communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-23T14:22:19Z)
• Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shift [105.27463615756733]
  We focus on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for classification problems via two avenues. We first argue that label shift hurts UQ, by showing degradation in coverage and calibration. We examine these techniques theoretically in a distribution-free framework and demonstrate their excellent practical performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T20:51:03Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.