Audio MultiChallenge: A Multi-Turn Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Systems on Natural Human Interaction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14865v1
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:26:44 GMT
- Title: Audio MultiChallenge: A Multi-Turn Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Systems on Natural Human Interaction
- Authors: Advait Gosai, Tyler Vuong, Utkarsh Tyagi, Steven Li, Wenjia You, Miheer Bavare, Arda Uçar, Zhongwang Fang, Brian Jang, Bing Liu, Yunzhong He,
- Abstract summary: We introduce Audio MultiChallenge, an open-source benchmark to evaluate E2E spoken dialogue systems under natural multi-turn interaction patterns.<n>We introduce a new axis Voice Editing that tests robustness to mid-utterance speech repairs and backtracking.<n>We curate 452 conversations from 47 speakers with 1,712 instance-specific rubrics through a hybrid audio-native agentic and human-in-the-loop pipeline.
- Score: 12.216811577733125
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: End-to-end (E2E) spoken dialogue systems are increasingly replacing cascaded pipelines for voice-based human-AI interaction, processing raw audio directly without intermediate transcription. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate these models on synthetic speech and single-turn tasks, leaving realistic multi-turn conversational ability underexplored. We introduce Audio MultiChallenge, an open-source benchmark to evaluate E2E spoken dialogue systems under natural multi-turn interaction patterns. Building on the text-based MultiChallenge framework, which evaluates Inference Memory, Instruction Retention, and Self Coherence, we introduce a new axis Voice Editing that tests robustness to mid-utterance speech repairs and backtracking. We further augment each axis to the audio modality, such as introducing Audio-Cue challenges for Inference Memory that require recalling ambient sounds and paralinguistic signals beyond semantic content. We curate 452 conversations from 47 speakers with 1,712 instance-specific rubrics through a hybrid audio-native agentic and human-in-the-loop pipeline that exposes model failures at scale while preserving natural disfluencies found in unscripted human speech. Our evaluation of proprietary and open-source models reveals that even frontier models struggle on our benchmark, with Gemini 3 Pro Preview (Thinking), our highest-performing model achieving a 54.65% pass rate. Error analysis shows that models fail most often on our new axes and that Self Coherence degrades with longer audio context. These failures reflect difficulty of tracking edits, audio cues, and long-range context in natural spoken dialogue. Audio MultiChallenge provides a reproducible testbed to quantify them and drive improvements in audio-native multi-turn interaction capability.
Related papers
- Covo-Audio Technical Report [61.09708870154148]
Covo-Audio, a 7B-end LALM, directly processes continuous audio inputs and generates audio outputs within a single unified architecture.<n>Covo-Audio-Chat, a dialogue-oriented variant, demonstrates semantic strong spoken conversational abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T14:31:11Z) - WearVox: An Egocentric Multichannel Voice Assistant Benchmark for Wearables [46.73480840435705]
WearVox is the first benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate voice assistants in realistic wearable scenarios.<n>It comprises 3,842 multi-channel, egocentric audio recordings collected via AI glasses across five diverse tasks.<n>We benchmark leading proprietary and open-source speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) and find that most real-time SLLMs achieve accuracies ranging from 29% to 59%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-25T06:39:21Z) - AV-Dialog: Spoken Dialogue Models with Audio-Visual Input [16.289812372606168]
We present AV-Dialog, the first framework that uses both audio and visual cues to track the target speaker, predict turn-taking, and generate coherent responses.<n>Experiments show that AV-Dialog outperforms audio-only models under interference, reducing transcription errors, improving turn-taking prediction, and enhancing human-rated dialogue quality.<n>These results highlight the power of seeing as well as hearing for speaker-aware interaction, paving the way for spoken dialogue agents that perform robustly in real-world, noisy environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-14T09:56:26Z) - AudioJudge: Understanding What Works in Large Audio Model Based Speech Evaluation [55.607230723223346]
This work presents a systematic study of Large Audio Model (LAM) as a Judge, AudioJudge, investigating whether it can provide a unified evaluation framework that addresses both challenges.<n>We explore AudioJudge across audio characteristic detection tasks, including pronunciation, speaking rate, speaker identification and speech quality, and system-level human preference simulation for automated benchmarking.<n>We introduce a multi-aspect ensemble AudioJudge to enable general-purpose multi-aspect audio evaluation. This method decomposes speech assessment into specialized judges for lexical content, speech quality, and paralinguistic features, achieving up to 0.91 Spearman correlation with human preferences on
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T00:39:18Z) - MultiVox: A Benchmark for Evaluating Voice Assistants for Multimodal Interactions [70.93364531054273]
We introduce MultiVox, the first benchmark to evaluate the ability of voice assistants to integrate spoken and visual cues.<n>Specifically, MultiVox includes 1000 human-annotated and recorded speech dialogues that encompass diverse paralinguistic features.<n>Our evaluation on 10 state-of-the-art models reveals that, although humans excel at these tasks, current models consistently struggle to produce contextually grounded responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T23:20:42Z) - Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z) - Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilities [93.09944267871163]
FullDuplexBench is a benchmark that systematically evaluates key interactive behaviors.<n>By releasing our benchmark code we aim to advance spoken dialogue modeling and the development of more natural and engaging SDMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T18:59:16Z) - Investigating the Effects of Large-Scale Pseudo-Stereo Data and Different Speech Foundation Model on Dialogue Generative Spoken Language Model [47.67067056593085]
We develop a pipeline capable of transforming single-channel dialogue data into pseudo-stereo data.
This expanded our training dataset from a mere 2,000 to an impressive 17,600 hours.
The inclusion of this pseudo-stereo data has proven to be effective in improving the performance of spoken dialogue language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T03:22:41Z) - AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension [95.8442896569132]
We introduce AIR-Bench, the first benchmark to evaluate the ability of Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) to understand various types of audio signals and interact with humans in the textual format.
Results demonstrate a high level of consistency between GPT-4-based evaluation and human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T15:41:22Z) - Learning to Listen: Modeling Non-Deterministic Dyadic Facial Motion [89.01668641930206]
We present a framework for modeling interactional communication in dyadic conversations.
We autoregressively output multiple possibilities of corresponding listener motion.
Our method organically captures the multimodal and non-deterministic nature of nonverbal dyadic interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-18T17:58:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.