AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07729v2
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:30:47 GMT
• Title: AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension
• Authors: Qian Yang, Jin Xu, Wenrui Liu, Yunfei Chu, Ziyue Jiang, Xiaohuan Zhou, Yichong Leng, Yuanjun Lv, Zhou Zhao, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou,
• Abstract summary: We introduce AIR-Bench, the first benchmark to evaluate the ability of Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) to understand various types of audio signals and interact with humans in the textual format. Results demonstrate a high level of consistency between GPT-4-based evaluation and human evaluation.
• Score: 95.8442896569132
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, instruction-following audio-language models have received broad attention for human-audio interaction. However, the absence of benchmarks capable of evaluating audio-centric interaction capabilities has impeded advancements in this field. Previous models primarily focus on assessing different fundamental tasks, such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), and lack an assessment of the open-ended generative capabilities centered around audio. Thus, it is challenging to track the progression in the Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) domain and to provide guidance for future improvement. In this paper, we introduce AIR-Bench (\textbf{A}udio \textbf{I}nst\textbf{R}uction \textbf{Bench}mark), the first benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LALMs to understand various types of audio signals (including human speech, natural sounds, and music), and furthermore, to interact with humans in the textual format. AIR-Bench encompasses two dimensions: \textit{foundation} and \textit{chat} benchmarks. The former consists of 19 tasks with approximately 19k single-choice questions, intending to inspect the basic single-task ability of LALMs. The latter one contains 2k instances of open-ended question-and-answer data, directly assessing the comprehension of the model on complex audio and its capacity to follow instructions. Both benchmarks require the model to generate hypotheses directly. We design a unified framework that leverages advanced language models, such as GPT-4, to evaluate the scores of generated hypotheses given the meta-information of the audio. Experimental results demonstrate a high level of consistency between GPT-4-based evaluation and human evaluation. By revealing the limitations of existing LALMs through evaluation results, AIR-Bench can provide insights into the direction of future research.

Related papers

• Audio Large Language Models Can Be Descriptive Speech Quality Evaluators [46.765203628127345]
  We introduce the first natural language-based speech evaluation corpus, generated from authentic human ratings. This corpus offers detailed analysis across multiple dimensions and identifies causes of quality degradation. We propose an alignment approach with LLM distillation (ALLD) to guide the audio LLM in extracting relevant information from raw speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:47:51Z)
• VoxEval: Benchmarking the Knowledge Understanding Capabilities of End-to-End Spoken Language Models [32.086847480051084]
  We present VoxEval, a novel SpeechQA benchmark that assesses knowledge understanding through pure speech interactions. Our benchmark 1) maintains speech format for both inputs and outputs, 2) evaluates model robustness across diverse input audio conditions, and 3) pioneers the assessment of complex tasks like mathematical reasoning in spoken format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T04:30:12Z)
• AV-Odyssey Bench: Can Your Multimodal LLMs Really Understand Audio-Visual Information? [65.49972312524724]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have expanded their capabilities to include vision and audio modalities. Our proposed DeafTest reveals that MLLMs often struggle with simple tasks humans find trivial. We introduce AV-Odyssey Bench, a comprehensive audio-visual benchmark designed to assess whether those MLLMs can truly understand the audio-visual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T17:41:23Z)
• SONAR: A Synthetic AI-Audio Detection Framework and Benchmark [59.09338266364506]
  SONAR is a synthetic AI-Audio Detection Framework and Benchmark. It aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation for distinguishing cutting-edge AI-synthesized auditory content. It is the first framework to uniformly benchmark AI-audio detection across both traditional and foundation model-based deepfake detection systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T01:03:42Z)
• CLAIR-A: Leveraging Large Language Models to Judge Audio Captions [73.51087998971418]
  evaluating machine-generated audio captions is a complex task that requires considering diverse factors. We propose CLAIR-A, a simple and flexible method that leverages the zero-shot capabilities of large language models. In our evaluations, CLAIR-A better predicts human judgements of quality compared to traditional metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T17:59:52Z)
• Salmon: A Suite for Acoustic Language Model Evaluation [20.802090523583196]
  We introduce SALMon, a novel evaluation suite encompassing background noise, emotion, speaker identity and room impulse response. We evaluate several speech language models on SALMon, thus highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each evaluated method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T17:34:52Z)
• Enhancing Audio-Language Models through Self-Supervised Post-Training with Text-Audio Pairs [3.8300818830608345]
  Multi-modal contrastive learning strategies for audio and text have rapidly gained interest. The ability of these models to understand natural language and temporal relations is still a largely unexplored and open field for research. We propose to equip the multi-modal ALMs with temporal understanding without loosing their inherent prior capabilities of audio-language tasks with a temporal instillation method TeminAL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T18:53:17Z)
• Disco-Bench: A Discourse-Aware Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelling [70.23876429382969]
  We propose a benchmark that can evaluate intra-sentence discourse properties across a diverse set of NLP tasks. Disco-Bench consists of 9 document-level testsets in the literature domain, which contain rich discourse phenomena. For linguistic analysis, we also design a diagnostic test suite that can examine whether the target models learn discourse knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:18:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.