Gaming the Arena: AI Model Evaluation and the Viral Capture of Attention

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15252v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:50:13 GMT
• Title: Gaming the Arena: AI Model Evaluation and the Viral Capture of Attention
• Authors: Sam Hind,
• Abstract summary: I examine the rise of so-called 'arenas' in which AI models are evaluated with reference to gladiatorial-style 'battles'<n>I argue that the arena-ization is being powered by a 'viral' desire to capture attention both in, and outside of, the AI community.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) has always been dependent on technological infrastructures, from code repositories to computing hardware. Yet industry - rather than universities - has become increasingly influential in shaping AI innovation. As generative forms of AI powered by large language models (LLMs) have driven the breakout of AI into the wider world, the AI community has sought to develop new methods for independently evaluating the performance of AI models. How best, in other words, to compare the performance of AI models against other AI models - and how best to account for new models launched on nearly a daily basis? Building on recent work in media studies, STS, and computer science on benchmarking and the practices of AI evaluation, I examine the rise of so-called 'arenas' in which AI models are evaluated with reference to gladiatorial-style 'battles'. Through a technography of a leading user-driven AI model evaluation platform, LMArena, I consider five themes central to the emerging 'arena-ization' of AI innovation. Accordingly, I argue that the arena-ization is being powered by a 'viral' desire to capture attention both in, and outside of, the AI community, critical to the scaling and commercialization of AI products. In the discussion, I reflect on the implications of 'arena gaming', a phenomenon through which model developers hope to capture attention.

Related papers

• Embodied AI: From LLMs to World Models [65.68972714346909]
  Embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an intelligent system paradigm for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)<n>Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) and World Models (WMs) have drawn significant attention for embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T11:37:48Z)
• Semantic Web and Software Agents -- A Forgotten Wave of Artificial Intelligence? [0.362565288307551]
  The rise of the Semantic Web is based on knowledge representation, logic, and reasoning.<n>ChatGPT has reignited AI enthusiasm, built on deep learning and advanced neural models.<n>The Semantic Web aimed to transform the World Wide Web into an ecosystem where AI could reason, understand, and act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T12:55:48Z)
• AI Generations: From AI 1.0 to AI 4.0 [3.4440023363051266]
  This paper proposes that Artificial Intelligence (AI) progresses through several overlapping generations.<n>Each of these AI generations is driven by shifting priorities among algorithms, computing power, and data.<n>It explores the profound ethical, regulatory, and philosophical challenges that arise when artificial systems approach (or aspire to) human-like autonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T23:19:44Z)
• The AI-Native Software Development Lifecycle: A Theoretical and Practical New Methodology [0.0]
  This white paper proposes the emergence of a fully AI-native SDLC. We introduce the V-Bounce model, an adaptation of the traditional V-model that incorporates AI from end to end. This model redefines the role of humans from primary implementers to primarily validators and verifiers with AI acting as an implementation engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T19:30:49Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Time for AI (Ethics) Maturity Model Is Now [15.870654219935972]
  This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective. We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-29T17:37:44Z)
• A clarification of misconceptions, myths and desired status of artificial intelligence [0.0]
  We present a perspective on the desired and current status of AI in relation to machine learning and statistics. Our discussion is intended to uncurtain the veil of vagueness surrounding AI to see its true countenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-03T17:22:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.