Time for AI (Ethics) Maturity Model Is Now
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12701v1
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:37:44 GMT
- Title: Time for AI (Ethics) Maturity Model Is Now
- Authors: Ville Vakkuri, Marianna Jantunen, Erika Halme, Kai-Kristian Kemell,
Anh Nguyen-Duc, Tommi Mikkonen, Pekka Abrahamsson
- Abstract summary: This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective.
We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system.
- Score: 15.870654219935972
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: There appears to be a common agreement that ethical concerns are of high
importance when it comes to systems equipped with some sort of Artificial
Intelligence (AI). Demands for ethical AI are declared from all directions. As
a response, in recent years, public bodies, governments, and universities have
rushed in to provide a set of principles to be considered when AI based systems
are designed and used. We have learned, however, that high-level principles do
not turn easily into actionable advice for practitioners. Hence, also companies
are publishing their own ethical guidelines to guide their AI development. This
paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from
the software development perspective. The software engineering paradigm has
introduced maturity model thinking, which provides a roadmap for companies to
improve their performance from the selected viewpoints known as the key
capabilities. We want to voice out a call for action for the development of a
maturity model for AI software. We wish to discuss whether the focus should be
on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system, called a maturity
model for the development of AI systems.
Related papers
- Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization.
We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z) - Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems [0.0]
There still exists a gap between principles and practices in AI ethics.
One major obstacle organisations face when attempting to operationalise AI Ethics is the lack of a well-defined material scope.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T12:16:01Z) - Development of an Adaptive Multi-Domain Artificial Intelligence System Built using Machine Learning and Expert Systems Technologies [0.0]
An artificial general intelligence (AGI) has been an elusive goal in artificial intelligence (AI) research for some time.
An AGI would have the capability, like a human, to be exposed to a new problem domain, learn about it and then use reasoning processes to make decisions.
This paper presents a small step towards producing an AGI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T07:21:44Z) - Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTube [11.209406323898019]
We analyze the 20 most watched introductory AI courses on YouTube.
Introductory AI courses do not meaningfully engage with ethical or societal challenges of AI.
We recommend that introductory AI courses should highlight ethical challenges of AI to present a more balanced perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T01:48:42Z) - End-User Development for Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic
Literature Review [2.347942013388615]
End-User Development (EUD) can allow people to create, customize, or adapt AI-based systems to their own needs.
This paper presents a literature review that aims to shed the light on the current landscape of EUD for AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-14T09:57:36Z) - Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering.
In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - A Deployment Model to Extend Ethically Aligned AI Implementation Method
ECCOLA [5.28595286827031]
This study aims to extend ECCOLA with a deployment model to drive the adoption of ECCOLA.
The model includes simple metrics to facilitate the communication of ethical gaps or outcomes of ethical AI development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-12T12:22:34Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.