Can AI Generate more Comprehensive Test Scenarios? Review on Automated Driving Systems Test Scenario Generation Methods

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15422v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:14:15 GMT
• Title: Can AI Generate more Comprehensive Test Scenarios? Review on Automated Driving Systems Test Scenario Generation Methods
• Authors: Ji Zhou, Yongqi Zhao, Yixian Hu, Hexuan Li, Zhengguo Gu, Nan Xu, Arno Eichberger,
• Abstract summary: This review systematically analyzes 31 primary studies,and 10 surveys identified through a comprehensive search spanning 20152025.<n>Traditional approaches rely on expert knowledge,ontologies,and naturalistic driving or accident data,while recent developments leverage generative models,including large language models, adversarial networks,diffusion models,and reinforcement learning frameworks,to synthesize diverse and safety-critical scenarios.
• Score: 19.39586739934126
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring the safety and reliability of Automated Driving Systems (ADS) remains a critical challenge, as traditional verification methods such as large-scale on-road testing are prohibitively costly and time-consuming.To address this,scenario-based testing has emerged as a scalable and efficient alternative,yet existing surveys provide only partial coverage of recent methodological and technological advances.This review systematically analyzes 31 primary studies,and 10 surveys identified through a comprehensive search spanning 2015~2025;however,the in-depth methodological synthesis and comparative evaluation focus primarily on recent frameworks(2023~2025),reflecting the surge of Artificial Intelligent(AI)-assisted and multimodal approaches in this period.Traditional approaches rely on expert knowledge,ontologies,and naturalistic driving or accident data,while recent developments leverage generative models,including large language models,generative adversarial networks,diffusion models,and reinforcement learning frameworks,to synthesize diverse and safety-critical scenarios.Our synthesis identifies three persistent gaps:the absence of standardized evaluation metrics,limited integration of ethical and human factors,and insufficient coverage of multimodal and Operational Design Domain (ODD)-specific scenarios.To address these challenges,this review contributes a refined taxonomy that incorporates multimodal extensions,an ethical and safety checklist for responsible scenario design,and an ODD coverage map with a scenario-difficulty schema to enable transparent benchmarking.Collectively,these contributions provide methodological clarity for researchers and practical guidance for industry,supporting reproducible evaluation and accelerating the safe deployment of higher-level ADS.

Related papers

• Let the Barbarians In: How AI Can Accelerate Systems Performance Research [80.43506848683633]
  We term this iterative cycle of generation, evaluation, and refinement AI-Driven Research for Systems.<n>We demonstrate that ADRS-generated solutions can match or even outperform human state-of-the-art designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T18:51:23Z)
• Large Language Models for Unit Test Generation: Achievements, Challenges, and the Road Ahead [15.43943391801509]
  Unit testing is an essential yet laborious technique for verifying software.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) address this limitation by utilizing by leveraging their data-driven knowledge of code semantics and programming patterns.<n>This framework analyzes the literature regarding core generative strategies and a set of enhancement techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T13:30:11Z)
• Real-IAD Variety: Pushing Industrial Anomaly Detection Dataset to a Modern Era [110.83702639978469]
  Real-IAD Variety is the largest and most diverse IAD benchmark, comprising 198,960 high-resolution images across 160 distinct object categories.<n>Its diversity is ensured through comprehensive coverage of 28 industries, 24 material types, and 22 color variations.<n>Real-IAD Variety will be made publicly available to facilitate innovation in this critical field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T12:58:02Z)
• AI-Driven Tools in Modern Software Quality Assurance: An Assessment of Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions [0.0]
  The research aims to assess the benefits, challenges, and prospects of integrating modern AI-oriented tools into quality assurance processes.<n>The research demonstrates AI's transformative potential for QA but highlights the importance of a strategic approach to implementing these technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T20:22:47Z)
• Anomaly Detection and Generation with Diffusion Models: A Survey [51.61574868316922]
  Anomaly detection (AD) plays a pivotal role across diverse domains, including cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, and industrial manufacturing.<n>Recent advancements in deep learning, specifically diffusion models (DMs), have sparked significant interest.<n>This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging DMs for innovative AD solutions across diverse applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T03:29:18Z)
• Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems [79.31011047593492]
  Embodied AI systems are increasingly prevalent across various applications.<n> Ensuring their safety in complex operating environments remains a major challenge.<n>This Perspective offers a pathway toward safer, large-scale adoption of embodied AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T15:46:25Z)
• Methods and Trends in Detecting AI-Generated Images: A Comprehensive Review [0.17188280334580194]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Diffusion Models, and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have enabled the synthesis of high-quality multimedia data.<n>These advancements have also raised significant concerns regarding adversarial attacks, unethical usage, and societal harm.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art techniques for detecting and classifying synthetic images generated by advanced generative AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T03:16:18Z)
• Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM [51.91311158085973]
  Methods for detecting AI-generated media have evolved rapidly.<n>General-purpose detectors based on MLLMs integrate authenticity verification, explainability, and localization capabilities.<n>Ethical and security considerations have emerged as critical global concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T12:18:20Z)
• A Systematic Review of Edge Case Detection in Automated Driving: Methods, Challenges and Future Directions [0.3871780652193725]
  This paper presents a practical, hierarchical review and systematic classification of edge case detection and assessment methodologies. Our classification is structured on two levels: first, categorizing detection approaches according to AV modules, including perception-related and trajectory-related edge cases. We introduce a new class called "knowledge-driven" approaches, which is largely overlooked in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:32:20Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Multimodal Safety-Critical Scenarios Generation for Decision-Making Algorithms Evaluation [23.43175124406634]
  Existing neural network-based autonomous systems are shown to be vulnerable against adversarial attacks. We propose a flow-based multimodal safety-critical scenario generator for evaluating decisionmaking algorithms. We evaluate six Reinforcement Learning algorithms with our generated traffic scenarios and provide empirical conclusions about their robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T15:16:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.