Value Lens: Using Large Language Models to Understand Human Values

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15722v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 04:15:00 GMT
• Title: Value Lens: Using Large Language Models to Understand Human Values
• Authors: Eduardo de la Cruz Fernández, Marcelo Karanik, Sascha Ossowski,
• Abstract summary: This article presents a text-based model designed to detect human values using generative artificial intelligence.<n>The proposed model operates in two stages: the first aims to formulate a formal theory of values, while the second focuses on identifying these values within a given text.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The autonomous decision-making process, which is increasingly applied to computer systems, requires that the choices made by these systems align with human values. In this context, systems must assess how well their decisions reflect human values. To achieve this, it is essential to identify whether each available action promotes or undermines these values. This article presents Value Lens, a text-based model designed to detect human values using generative artificial intelligence, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs). The proposed model operates in two stages: the first aims to formulate a formal theory of values, while the second focuses on identifying these values within a given text. In the first stage, an LLM generates a description based on the established theory of values, which experts then verify. In the second stage, a pair of LLMs is employed: one LLM detects the presence of values, and the second acts as a critic and reviewer of the detection process. The results indicate that Value Lens performs comparably to, and even exceeds, the effectiveness of other models that apply different methods for similar tasks.

Related papers

• Learning the Value Systems of Societies with Preference-based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning [4.735670734773144]
  Value-aware AI should recognise human values and adapt to the value systems (value-based preferences) of different users.<n>We propose algorithms for learning models of value alignment and value systems for a society of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T16:06:36Z)
• Evaluating AI Alignment in Eleven LLMs through Output-Based Analysis and Human Benchmarking [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in psychological research and practice, yet traditional benchmarks reveal little about the values they express in real interaction.<n>We introduce PAPERS, output-based evaluation of the values LLMs express.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T20:14:02Z)
• Value Portrait: Assessing Language Models' Values through Psychometrically and Ecologically Valid Items [2.9357382494347264]
  Existing benchmarks rely on human or machine annotations that are vulnerable to value-related biases.<n>We propose the Value Portrait benchmark, which consists of items that capture real-life user-LLM interactions.<n>This psychometrically validated approach ensures that items strongly correlated with specific values serve as reliable items for assessing those values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T05:26:50Z)
• Value Compass Benchmarks: A Platform for Fundamental and Validated Evaluation of LLMs Values [76.70893269183684]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable breakthroughs.<n> aligning their values with humans has become imperative for their responsible development.<n>There still lack evaluations of LLMs values that fulfill three desirable goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T05:53:56Z)
• CLAVE: An Adaptive Framework for Evaluating Values of LLM Generated Responses [34.77031649891843]
  We introduce CLAVE, a novel framework which integrates two complementary Large Language Models (LLMs) This dual-model approach enables calibration with any value systems using 100 human-labeled samples per value type. We present ValEval, a comprehensive dataset comprising 13k+ (text,value,label) 12+s across diverse domains, covering three major value systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T13:51:37Z)
• Beyond Human Norms: Unveiling Unique Values of Large Language Models through Interdisciplinary Approaches [69.73783026870998]
  This work proposes a novel framework, ValueLex, to reconstruct Large Language Models' unique value system from scratch. Based on Lexical Hypothesis, ValueLex introduces a generative approach to elicit diverse values from 30+ LLMs. We identify three core value dimensions, Competence, Character, and Integrity, each with specific subdimensions, revealing that LLMs possess a structured, albeit non-human, value system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T09:44:51Z)
• High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Models [60.33033114185092]
  We propose UniVaR, a high-dimensional neural representation of symbolic human value distributions in LLMs.<n>This is a continuous and scalable representation, self-supervised from the value-relevant output of 8 LLMs.<n>We explore how LLMs prioritize different values in 25 languages and cultures, shedding light on complex interplay between human values and language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T16:39:00Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
  We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark. In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship. We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z)
• Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation for Large Language Models [91.96728871418]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made it crucial to align their values with those of humans. We propose a Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation (HVAE) system to assess the success of aligning LLMs with heterogeneous values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T02:34:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.