Dual-View Inference Attack: Machine Unlearning Amplifies Privacy Exposure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16126v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 03:24:50 GMT
• Title: Dual-View Inference Attack: Machine Unlearning Amplifies Privacy Exposure
• Authors: Lulu Xue, Shengshan Hu, Linqiang Qian, Peijin Guo, Yechao Zhang, Minghui Li, Yanjun Zhang, Dayong Ye, Leo Yu Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We focus on the privacy risks of retained data and reveal the vulnerabilities introduced by machine unlearning under the dual-view setting.<n>We propose DVIA, a Dual-View Inference Attack, which extracts membership information on retained data using black-box queries to both models.
• Score: 45.982793975877264
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine unlearning is a newly popularized technique for removing specific training data from a trained model, enabling it to comply with data deletion requests. While it protects the rights of users requesting unlearning, it also introduces new privacy risks. Prior works have primarily focused on the privacy of data that has been unlearned, while the risks to retained data remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, we focus on the privacy risks of retained data and, for the first time, reveal the vulnerabilities introduced by machine unlearning under the dual-view setting, where an adversary can query both the original and the unlearned models. From an information-theoretic perspective, we introduce the concept of {privacy knowledge gain} and demonstrate that the dual-view setting allows adversaries to obtain more information than querying either model alone, thereby amplifying privacy leakage. To effectively demonstrate this threat, we propose DVIA, a Dual-View Inference Attack, which extracts membership information on retained data using black-box queries to both models. DVIA eliminates the need to train an attack model and employs a lightweight likelihood ratio inference module for efficient inference. Experiments across different datasets and model architectures validate the effectiveness of DVIA and highlight the privacy risks inherent in the dual-view setting.

Related papers

• Unlearned but Not Forgotten: Data Extraction after Exact Unlearning in LLM [31.093224824043087]
  We introduce a novel data extraction attack that leverages signals from the pre-unlearning model to guide the post-unlearning model.<n>We demonstrate our attack's effectiveness on a simulated medical diagnosis dataset to highlight real-world privacy risks associated with exact unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T09:09:33Z)
• Game-Theoretic Machine Unlearning: Mitigating Extra Privacy Leakage [12.737028324709609]
  Recent legislation obligates organizations to remove requested data and its influence from a trained model. We propose a game-theoretic machine unlearning algorithm that simulates the competitive relationship between unlearning performance and privacy protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T13:47:04Z)
• Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning [16.809644622465086]
  We conduct the first investigation to understand the extent to which machine unlearning can leak the confidential content of unlearned data. Under the Machine Learning as a Service setting, we propose unlearning inversion attacks that can reveal the feature and label information of an unlearned sample. The experimental results indicate that the proposed attack can reveal the sensitive information of the unlearned data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T06:37:46Z)
• Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained Models [112.48136829374741]
  In this paper, we unveil a new vulnerability: the privacy backdoor attack. When a victim fine-tunes a backdoored model, their training data will be leaked at a significantly higher rate than if they had fine-tuned a typical model. Our findings highlight a critical privacy concern within the machine learning community and call for a reevaluation of safety protocols in the use of open-source pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Rethinking Privacy in Machine Learning Pipelines from an Information Flow Control Perspective [16.487545258246932]
  Modern machine learning systems use models trained on ever-growing corpora. metadata such as ownership, access control, or licensing information is ignored during training. We take an information flow control perspective to describe machine learning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T13:14:39Z)
• Diff-Privacy: Diffusion-based Face Privacy Protection [58.1021066224765]
  In this paper, we propose a novel face privacy protection method based on diffusion models, dubbed Diff-Privacy. Specifically, we train our proposed multi-scale image inversion module (MSI) to obtain a set of SDM format conditional embeddings of the original image. Based on the conditional embeddings, we design corresponding embedding scheduling strategies and construct different energy functions during the denoising process to achieve anonymization and visual identity information hiding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T09:26:07Z)
• RecUP-FL: Reconciling Utility and Privacy in Federated Learning via User-configurable Privacy Defense [9.806681555309519]
  Federated learning (FL) allows clients to collaboratively train a model without sharing their private data. Recent studies have shown that private information can still be leaked through shared gradients. We propose a user-configurable privacy defense, RecUP-FL, that can better focus on the user-specified sensitive attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T10:59:45Z)
• Students Parrot Their Teachers: Membership Inference on Model Distillation [54.392069096234074]
  We study the privacy provided by knowledge distillation to both the teacher and student training sets. Our attacks are strongest when student and teacher sets are similar, or when the attacker can poison the teacher set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:16:23Z)
• Hiding Visual Information via Obfuscating Adversarial Perturbations [47.315523613407244]
  We propose an adversarial visual information hiding method to protect the visual privacy of data. Specifically, the method generates obfuscating adversarial perturbations to obscure the visual information of the data. Experimental results on the recognition and classification tasks demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively hide visual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T08:23:26Z)
• Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secrets [53.866927712193416]
  We show that an adversary who can poison a training dataset can cause models trained on this dataset to leak private details belonging to other parties. Our attacks are effective across membership inference, attribute inference, and data extraction. Our results cast doubts on the relevance of cryptographic privacy guarantees in multiparty protocols for machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T18:06:28Z)
• Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queries [74.59376038272661]
  We introduce sampling attack, a novel membership inference technique that unlike other standard membership adversaries is able to work under severe restriction of no access to scores of the victim model. We show that a victim model that only publishes the labels is still susceptible to sampling attacks and the adversary can recover up to 100% of its performance. For defense, we choose differential privacy in the form of gradient perturbation during the training of the victim model as well as output perturbation at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T12:54:54Z)
• When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacy [25.167214892258567]
  We investigate the unintended information leakage caused by machine unlearning. We propose a novel membership inference attack that achieves strong performance. Our results can help improve privacy protection in practical implementations of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T14:11:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.