AI Needs Physics More Than Physics Needs AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16344v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:31:05 GMT
• Title: AI Needs Physics More Than Physics Needs AI
• Authors: Peter Coveney, Roger Highfield,
• Abstract summary: The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Physics recognized AI's potential, but broader assessments indicate the impact to date is often more promotional than technical.<n>We argue that while current AI may influence physics, physics has significantly more to offer this generation of AI.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly depicted as transformative. Yet, after more than a decade of hype, its measurable impact remains modest outside a few high-profile scientific and commercial successes. The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Physics recognized AI's potential, but broader assessments indicate the impact to date is often more promotional than technical. We argue that while current AI may influence physics, physics has significantly more to offer this generation of AI. Current architectures - large language models, reasoning models, and agentic AI - can depend on trillions of meaningless parameters, suffer from distributional bias, lack uncertainty quantification, provide no mechanistic insights, and fail to capture even elementary scientific laws. We review critiques of these limits, highlight opportunities in quantum AI and analogue computing, and lay down a roadmap for the adoption of 'Big AI': a synthesis of theory-based rigour with the flexibility of machine learning.

Related papers

• Towards autonomous quantum physics research using LLM agents with access to intelligent tools [0.19116784879310023]
  We present AI-Mandel, an agent that can generate and implement ideas in quantum physics.<n> AI-Mandel formulates ideas from the literature and uses a domain-specific AI tool to turn them into concrete experiment designs.<n>The ideas include new variations of quantum teleportation, primitives of quantum networks in indefinite causal orders, and new concepts of geometric phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T18:18:58Z)
• Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI [57.44526951497041]
  We advocate for intelligent systems that ground learning in both physical principles and embodied reasoning processes.<n>Our synthesis envisions next-generation world models capable of explaining physical phenomena and predicting future states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T16:16:03Z)
• What is AI, what is it not, how we use it in physics and how it impacts... you [0.0]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have been prevalent in particle physics for over three decades.<n>This paper critically examines its foundations, misconceptions, trends and impact.<n>Beyond physics, it also addresses the broader societal applications of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:35:43Z)
• AI in the Cosmos [0.0]
  I highlight examples of AI applications in astrophysics, including source classification, spectral energy distribution modeling, and discuss the achievable advancements through generative AI.<n>The use of AI introduces challenges, including biases, errors, and the "black box" nature of AI models, which must be resolved before their application.<n>These issues can be addressed through the concept of Human-Guided AI (HG-AI), which integrates human expertise and domain-specific knowledge into AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T12:30:11Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Examining the Differential Risk from High-level Artificial Intelligence and the Question of Control [0.0]
  The extent and scope of future AI capabilities remain a key uncertainty. There are concerns over the extent of integration and oversight of AI opaque decision processes. This study presents a hierarchical complex systems framework to model AI risk and provide a template for alternative futures analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-06T15:46:02Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A reality rooted perspective [0.0]
  We provide a discussion what explainable AI can be. We do not present wishful thinking but reality grounded properties in relation to a scientific theory beyond physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-26T15:09:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.