Comprehensive AI Literacy: The Case for Centering Human Agency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16656v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:25:38 GMT
• Title: Comprehensive AI Literacy: The Case for Centering Human Agency
• Authors: Sri Yash Tadimalla, Justin Cary, Gordon Hull, Jordan Register, Daniel Maxwell, David Pugalee, Tina Heafner,
• Abstract summary: We are witnessing the rise of a dangerous gap, where a focus on the functional, operational skills of using AI tools is eclipsing the development of critical and ethical reasoning about them.<n>This position paper argues for a systemic shift toward comprehensive AI literacy that centers human agency.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid assimilation of Artificial Intelligence technologies into various facets of society has created a significant educational imperative that current frameworks are failing to effectively address. We are witnessing the rise of a dangerous literacy gap, where a focus on the functional, operational skills of using AI tools is eclipsing the development of critical and ethical reasoning about them. This position paper argues for a systemic shift toward comprehensive AI literacy that centers human agency - the empowered capacity for intentional, critical, and responsible choice. This principle applies to all stakeholders in the educational ecosystem: it is the student's agency to question, create with, or consciously decide not to use AI based on the task; it is the teacher's agency to design learning experiences that align with instructional values, rather than ceding pedagogical control to a tool. True literacy involves teaching about agency itself, framing technology not as an inevitability to be adopted, but as a choice to be made. This requires a deep commitment to critical thinking and a robust understanding of epistemology. Through the AI Literacy, Fluency, and Competency frameworks described in this paper, educators and students will become agents in their own human-centric approaches to AI, providing necessary pathways to clearly articulate the intentions informing decisions and attitudes toward AI and the impact of these decisions on academic work, career, and society.

Related papers

• Integration of AI in STEM Education, Addressing Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings [0.0]
  The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence into K-12 STEM education presents transformative opportunities alongside significant ethical challenges.<n>This paper examines the dual-edged impact of AI in STEM classrooms, analyzing its benefits (e.g., adaptive learning, real-time feedback) and drawbacks (e.g., surveillance risks, pedagogical limitations) through an ethical lens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T03:07:26Z)
• The Mechanical Yes-Man: Emancipatory AI Pedagogy in Higher Education [0.0]
  Generative AI's statistical logic and lack of causal reasoning threaten cognitive processes essential for genuine learning.<n>The paper critiques both techno-optimistic and restrictive approaches to generative AI in education.<n>It proposes an emancipatory pedagogy grounded in verification, mastery, and co-inquiry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T11:29:06Z)
• Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education [7.673465837624366]
  The paper argues that while AI can support learning, its unchecked use may lead to cognitive atrophy.<n>The paper advocates for an intentional, transparent, and critically informed use of AI that empowers rather than diminishes the learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T14:15:49Z)
• AI in Education: Rationale, Principles, and Instructional Implications [0.0]
  Generative AI, like ChatGPT, can create human-like content, prompting questions about its educational role.<n>The study emphasizes deliberate strategies to ensure AI complements, not replaces, genuine cognitive effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T14:08:07Z)
• Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
  This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education [0.0]
  This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape. It emphasizes its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools. It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T14:02:47Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.