The Mechanical Yes-Man: Emancipatory AI Pedagogy in Higher Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10176v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 11:29:06 GMT
• Title: The Mechanical Yes-Man: Emancipatory AI Pedagogy in Higher Education
• Authors: Linda Rocco,
• Abstract summary: Generative AI's statistical logic and lack of causal reasoning threaten cognitive processes essential for genuine learning.<n>The paper critiques both techno-optimistic and restrictive approaches to generative AI in education.<n>It proposes an emancipatory pedagogy grounded in verification, mastery, and co-inquiry.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of Large Language Models in higher education presents a fundamental challenge to traditional pedagogical frameworks. Drawing on Jacques Ranci\`ere's theory of intellectual emancipation, this paper examines how generative AI risks becoming a "mechanical yes-man" that reinforces passivity rather than fostering intellectual autonomy. Generative AI's statistical logic and lack of causal reasoning, combined with frictionless information access, threatens to hollow out cognitive processes essential for genuine learning. This creates a critical paradox: while generative AI systems are trained for complex reasoning, students increasingly use them to bypass the intellectual work that builds such capabilities. The paper critiques both techno-optimistic and restrictive approaches to generative AI in education, proposing instead an emancipatory pedagogy grounded in verification, mastery, and co-inquiry. This framework positions generative AI as material for intellectual work rather than a substitute for it, emphasising the cultivation of metacognitive awareness and critical interrogation of AI outputs. It requires educators to engage directly with these tools to guide students toward critical AI literacy, transforming pedagogical authority from explication to critical interloping that models intellectual courage and collaborative inquiry.

Related papers

• Comprehensive AI Literacy: The Case for Centering Human Agency [0.0]
  We are witnessing the rise of a dangerous gap, where a focus on the functional, operational skills of using AI tools is eclipsing the development of critical and ethical reasoning about them.<n>This position paper argues for a systemic shift toward comprehensive AI literacy that centers human agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T15:25:38Z)
• Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
  Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z)
• Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education [7.673465837624366]
  The paper argues that while AI can support learning, its unchecked use may lead to cognitive atrophy.<n>The paper advocates for an intentional, transparent, and critically informed use of AI that empowers rather than diminishes the learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T14:15:49Z)
• Beyond Statistical Learning: Exact Learning Is Essential for General Intelligence [59.07578850674114]
  Sound deductive reasoning is an indisputably desirable aspect of general intelligence.<n>It is well-documented that even the most advanced frontier systems regularly and consistently falter on easily-solvable reasoning tasks.<n>We argue that their unsound behavior is a consequence of the statistical learning approach powering their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:37:50Z)
• A Conceptual Exploration of Generative AI-Induced Cognitive Dissonance and its Emergence in University-Level Academic Writing [0.0]
  This work explores how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) serves as both a trigger and amplifier of cognitive dissonance (CD)<n>We introduce a hypothetical construct of GenAI-induced CD, illustrating the tension between AI-driven efficiency and the principles of originality, effort, and intellectual ownership.<n>We discuss strategies to mitigate this dissonance, including reflective pedagogy, AI literacy programs, transparency in GenAI use, and discipline-specific task redesigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T21:31:04Z)
• AI in Education: Rationale, Principles, and Instructional Implications [0.0]
  Generative AI, like ChatGPT, can create human-like content, prompting questions about its educational role.<n>The study emphasizes deliberate strategies to ensure AI complements, not replaces, genuine cognitive effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T14:08:07Z)
• Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
  This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education [0.0]
  This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape. It emphasizes its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools. It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T14:02:47Z)
• Qualitative and quantitative analysis of student's perceptions in the use of generative AI in educational environments [0.0]
  The effective integration of generative artificial intelligence in education is a fundamental aspect to prepare future generations. The objective of this study is to analyze from a quantitative and qualitative point of view the perception of controlled student-IA interaction within the classroom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T09:56:05Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.