Posterior Behavioral Cloning: Pretraining BC Policies for Efficient RL Finetuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16911v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 18:59:17 GMT
• Title: Posterior Behavioral Cloning: Pretraining BC Policies for Efficient RL Finetuning
• Authors: Andrew Wagenmaker, Perry Dong, Raymond Tsao, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine,
• Abstract summary: We first show theoretically that standard behavioral cloning (BC) can fail to ensure coverage over the demonstrator's actions.<n>We then show that if, instead of exactly fitting the observed demonstrations, we train a policy to model the posterior distribution of the demonstrator's behavior.<n>This policy ensures coverage over the demonstrator's actions, enabling more effective finetuning.
• Score: 87.81738284453013
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Standard practice across domains from robotics to language is to first pretrain a policy on a large-scale demonstration dataset, and then finetune this policy, typically with reinforcement learning (RL), in order to improve performance on deployment domains. This finetuning step has proved critical in achieving human or super-human performance, yet while much attention has been given to developing more effective finetuning algorithms, little attention has been given to ensuring the pretrained policy is an effective initialization for RL finetuning. In this work we seek to understand how the pretrained policy affects finetuning performance, and how to pretrain policies in order to ensure they are effective initializations for finetuning. We first show theoretically that standard behavioral cloning (BC) -- which trains a policy to directly match the actions played by the demonstrator -- can fail to ensure coverage over the demonstrator's actions, a minimal condition necessary for effective RL finetuning. We then show that if, instead of exactly fitting the observed demonstrations, we train a policy to model the posterior distribution of the demonstrator's behavior given the demonstration dataset, we do obtain a policy that ensures coverage over the demonstrator's actions, enabling more effective finetuning. Furthermore, this policy -- which we refer to as the posterior behavioral cloning (PostBC) policy -- achieves this while ensuring pretrained performance is no worse than that of the BC policy. We then show that PostBC is practically implementable with modern generative models in robotic control domains -- relying only on standard supervised learning -- and leads to significantly improved RL finetuning performance on both realistic robotic control benchmarks and real-world robotic manipulation tasks, as compared to standard behavioral cloning.

Related papers

• EXPO: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Expressive Policies [74.30151915786233]
  We propose a sample-efficient online reinforcement learning algorithm to maximize value with two parameterized policies.<n>Our approach yields up to 2-3x improvement in sample efficiency on average over prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T17:57:46Z)
• Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learning [46.598122553180005]
  Behavioral cloning (BC)-learned policies typically require collecting additional human demonstrations to further improve their behavior.<n> reinforcement learning (RL) holds the promise of enabling autonomous online policy improvement, but often falls short of achieving this due to the large number of samples it typically requires.<n>We show that DSRL is highly sample efficient, requires only black-box access to the BC policy, and enables effective real-world autonomous policy improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T18:35:57Z)
• Zero-Shot Whole-Body Humanoid Control via Behavioral Foundation Models [71.34520793462069]
  Unsupervised reinforcement learning (RL) aims at pre-training agents that can solve a wide range of downstream tasks in complex environments.<n>We introduce a novel algorithm regularizing unsupervised RL towards imitating trajectories from unlabeled behavior datasets.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of this new approach in a challenging humanoid control problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T10:41:11Z)
• FDPP: Fine-tune Diffusion Policy with Human Preference [57.44575105114056]
  Fine-tuning Diffusion Policy with Human Preference learns a reward function through preference-based learning.<n>This reward is then used to fine-tune the pre-trained policy with reinforcement learning.<n>Experiments demonstrate that FDPP effectively customizes policy behavior without compromising performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T17:15:27Z)
• Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representations [54.44869979017766]
  We propose an unsupervised framework to pre-train generalist policies from unlabeled offline data. Our key insight is to learn a structured representation that preserves the temporal structure of the underlying environment. Our experiments show that our unsupervised policies can solve goal-conditioned and general RL tasks in a zero-shot fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T19:09:10Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Policy Improvement Operators [88.54210578912554]
  Behavior constrained policy optimization has been demonstrated to be a successful paradigm for tackling Offline Reinforcement Learning. In this paper, we propose our closed-form policy improvement operators. We empirically demonstrate their effectiveness over state-of-the-art algorithms on the standard D4RL benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T06:29:26Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Soft Behavior Regularization [0.8937096931077437]
  In this work, we derive a new policy learning objective that can be used in the offline setting. Unlike state-independent regularization used in prior approaches, this textitsoft regularization allows more freedom of policy deviation. Our experimental results show that SBAC matches or outperforms the state-of-the-art on a set of continuous control locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T14:29:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.