Learning-Based Safety-Aware Task Scheduling for Efficient Human-Robot Collaboration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17560v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 13:29:32 GMT
• Title: Learning-Based Safety-Aware Task Scheduling for Efficient Human-Robot Collaboration
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a safety-aware approach to mitigate efficiency losses without assuming prior knowledge of safety logic.<n>Our framework does not explicitly predict human motions but directly models the interaction effects on robot speed.<n>Experiments on a pick-and-packaging scenario demonstrated significant reductions in cycle times.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring human safety in collaborative robotics can compromise efficiency because traditional safety measures increase robot cycle time when human interaction is frequent. This paper proposes a safety-aware approach to mitigate efficiency losses without assuming prior knowledge of safety logic. Using a deep-learning model, the robot learns the relationship between system state and safety-induced speed reductions based on execution data. Our framework does not explicitly predict human motions but directly models the interaction effects on robot speed, simplifying implementation and enhancing generalizability to different safety logics. At runtime, the learned model optimizes task selection to minimize cycle time while adhering to safety requirements. Experiments on a pick-and-packaging scenario demonstrated significant reductions in cycle times.

Related papers

• RoboSafe: Safeguarding Embodied Agents via Executable Safety Logic [56.38397499463889]
  Embodied agents powered by vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly capable of executing complex real-world tasks.<n>However, they remain vulnerable to hazardous instructions that may trigger unsafe behaviors.<n>We propose RoboSafe, a runtime safeguard for embodied agents through executable predicate-based safety logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T15:01:26Z)
• On Using Neural Networks to Learn Safety Speed Reduction in Human-Robot Collaboration: A Comparative Analysis [4.825154649093785]
  We propose a deep learning approach to predict the robot's safety scaling factor directly from process execution data.<n>We analyze multiple neural network architectures and demonstrate that a simple feed-forward network effectively estimates the robot's slowdown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T13:46:56Z)
• Self-Augmented Robot Trajectory: Efficient Imitation Learning via Safe Self-augmentation with Demonstrator-annotated Precision [2.3548641190233264]
  Self-Augmented Robot Trajectory (SART) is a framework that enables policy learning from a single human demonstration.<n>SART achieves substantially higher success rates than policies trained solely on human-collected demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T23:10:56Z)
• ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots [48.89876809734855]
  We present the first systematic study of adversarial safety attacks on embodied AI systems.<n>We show attack success rates exceeding 50% across all safety categories.<n>Results expose a previously underexplored but highly consequential attack surface in embodied AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T15:00:28Z)
• Action Flow Matching for Continual Robot Learning [54.10050120844738]
  Continual learning in robotics seeks systems that can constantly adapt to changing environments and tasks.<n>We introduce a generative framework leveraging flow matching for online robot dynamics model alignment.<n>We find that by transforming the actions themselves rather than exploring with a misaligned model, the robot collects informative data more efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T16:26:15Z)
• Don't Let Your Robot be Harmful: Responsible Robotic Manipulation via Safety-as-Policy [53.048430683355804]
  Unthinking execution of human instructions in robotic manipulation can lead to severe safety risks.<n>We present Safety-as-policy, which includes (i) a world model to automatically generate scenarios containing safety risks and conduct virtual interactions, and (ii) a mental model to infer consequences with reflections.<n>We show that Safety-as-policy can avoid risks and efficiently complete tasks in both synthetic dataset and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T12:27:50Z)
• Motion Prediction with Gaussian Processes for Safe Human-Robot Interaction in Virtual Environments [1.677718351174347]
  Collaborative robots must be safe to operate alongside humans to minimize the risk of accidental collisions. This research aims to improve the efficiency of a collaborative robot while improving the safety of the human user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T05:51:41Z)
• Deception Game: Closing the Safety-Learning Loop in Interactive Robot Autonomy [7.915956857741506]
  Existing safety methods often neglect the robot's ability to learn and adapt at runtime, leading to overly conservative behavior. This paper proposes a new closed-loop paradigm for synthesizing safe control policies that explicitly account for the robot's evolving uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T20:34:01Z)
• Revisiting the Adversarial Robustness-Accuracy Tradeoff in Robot Learning [121.9708998627352]
  Recent work has shown that, in practical robot learning applications, the effects of adversarial training do not pose a fair trade-off. This work revisits the robustness-accuracy trade-off in robot learning by analyzing if recent advances in robust training methods and theory can make adversarial training suitable for real-world robot applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T08:12:15Z)
• SHARP: Shielding-Aware Robust Planning for Safe and Efficient Human-Robot Interaction [5.804727815849655]
  " Shielding" control scheme overrides the robot's nominal plan with a safety fallback strategy when a safety-critical event is imminent. We propose a new shielding-based planning approach that allows the robot to plan efficiently by explicitly accounting for possible future shielding events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T17:01:59Z)
• Adversarial Training is Not Ready for Robot Learning [55.493354071227174]
  Adversarial training is an effective method to train deep learning models that are resilient to norm-bounded perturbations. We show theoretically and experimentally that neural controllers obtained via adversarial training are subjected to three types of defects. Our results suggest that adversarial training is not yet ready for robot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T07:51:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.