Embedded Safety-Aligned Intelligence via Differentiable Internal Alignment Embeddings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18309v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:42:48 GMT
• Title: Embedded Safety-Aligned Intelligence via Differentiable Internal Alignment Embeddings
• Abstract summary: We introduce Embedded Safety-Aligned Intelligence (ESAI), a theoretical framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning.<n>ESAI embeds alignment constraints directly into agents internal representations using differentiable internal alignment embeddings.<n>This work positions ESAI as a conceptual contribution to differentiable alignment mechanisms in multi-agent systems.
• Score: 1.9472752597752354
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce Embedded Safety-Aligned Intelligence (ESAI), a theoretical framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning that embeds alignment constraints directly into agents internal representations using differentiable internal alignment embeddings. Unlike external reward shaping or post-hoc safety constraints, internal alignment embeddings are learned latent variables that predict externalized harm through counterfactual reasoning and modulate policy updates toward harm reduction through attention and graph-based propagation. The ESAI framework integrates four mechanisms: differentiable counterfactual alignment penalties computed from soft reference distributions, alignment-weighted perceptual attention, Hebbian associative memory supporting temporal credit assignment, and similarity-weighted graph diffusion with bias mitigation controls. We analyze stability conditions for bounded internal embeddings under Lipschitz continuity and spectral constraints, discuss computational complexity, and examine theoretical properties including contraction behavior and fairness-performance tradeoffs. This work positions ESAI as a conceptual contribution to differentiable alignment mechanisms in multi-agent systems. We identify open theoretical questions regarding convergence guarantees, embedding dimensionality, and extension to high-dimensional environments. Empirical evaluation is left to future work.

Related papers

• Mechanistic Interpretability of LLM Jailbreaks via Internal Attribution Graphs [0.8658568246382029]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities but remain highly vulnerable to adversarial prompts and jailbreak attacks.<n>Existing approaches primarily analyze these failures through input-output behaviors or attribution methods.<n>We introduce a mechanistic framework for diagnosing vulnerabilities using paired internal computation graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T20:31:06Z)
• Provable Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via the Primal-Dual Perspective on Differential Privacy [51.758416625168]
  Randomized smoothing is a powerful tool for certifying robustness to adversarial perturbations.<n>We propose a framework for certification of complex, composed mechanisms.<n>We provide a principled and general framework for using composite mechanisms to certify robustness under complex threat models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T22:17:29Z)
• Mechanical Conscience: A Mathematical Framework for Dependability of Machine Intelligenc [0.0]
  This paper introduces mechanical conscience (MC), a novel concept and simplified mathematical framework.<n>MC operationalizes trajectory-level normative regulation for both single-agent and distributed intelligent systems.<n>Core theoretical properties are established: admissibility equivalence, existence of optimal regulation, and monotonic deviation reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T15:14:02Z)
• Position: General Alignment Has Hit a Ceiling; Edge Alignment Must Be Taken Seriously [51.03213216886717]
  We take the position that the dominant paradigm of General Alignment reaches a structural ceiling in settings with conflicting values.<n>We introduce Edge Alignment as a distinct approach in which systems preserve multi dimensional value structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:51:43Z)
• Heterogeneous Uncertainty-Guided Composed Image Retrieval with Fine-Grained Probabilistic Learning [49.28548464288051]
  Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) enables image search by combining a reference image with modification text.<n>In intrinsic noise in CIR triplets incurs intrinsic uncertainty and threatens the model's robustness.<n>This paper introduces a Heterogeneous Uncertainty-Guided (HUG) paradigm to overcome these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T16:05:49Z)
• Explainability-Guided Defense: Attribution-Aware Model Refinement Against Adversarial Data Attacks [6.573058520271728]
  We identify a connection between interpretability and robustness that can be directly leveraged during training.<n>We introduce an attribution-guided refinement framework that transforms Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations into an active training signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T19:36:03Z)
• Human-like Social Compliance in Large Language Models: Unifying Sycophancy and Conformity through Signal Competition Dynamics [7.209622481153123]
  This study introduces the Signal Competition Mechanism, a unified framework validated by assessing behavioral correlations across 15 Large Language Models.<n>The transition to compliance is shown to be a deterministic process governed by a linear boundary, where the Social Emotional Signal effectively suppresses the Information Signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T06:57:42Z)
• Quantum deliberating machines [0.0]
  We introduce and analyze a toy model of a quantum physical device capable of internal, self-referential deliberation.<n>We provide explicit quantum circuit realizations, carry out detailed step-by-step derivations of the entangled control-memory-system-policy dynamics.<n>We briefly discuss categorical and controlled-Stinespring reformulations, as well as their conceptual implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-09T17:20:17Z)
• ERIS: An Energy-Guided Feature Disentanglement Framework for Out-of-Distribution Time Series Classification [51.07970070817353]
  An ideal time series classification (TSC) should be able to capture invariant representations.<n>Current methods are largely unguided, lacking the semantic direction required to isolate truly universal features.<n>We propose an end-to-end Energy-Regularized Information for Shift-Robustness framework to enable guided and reliable feature disentanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T12:13:41Z)
• Let's Measure Information Step-by-Step: LLM-Based Evaluation Beyond Vibes [14.371259136517802]
  We study robustness of AI systems without ground truth by exploiting a link between strategic gaming and information loss.<n>We analyze which information-theoretic mechanisms resist adversarial bounds, extending finite-sample manipulation to show that bounded f-divergences maintain under attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T15:11:43Z)
• Re-Emergent Misalignment: How Narrow Fine-Tuning Erodes Safety Alignment in LLMs [0.0]
  We show that fine tuning on insecure code induces internal changes that oppose alignment.<n>We identify a shared latent dimension in the model's activation space that governs alignment behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T15:36:58Z)
• Multi-Scale Manifold Alignment for Interpreting Large Language Models: A Unified Information-Geometric Framework [4.935224714809964]
  We present Multi-Scale Manifold Alignment (MSMA), an information-geometric framework that decomposes LLM representations into local, intermediate, and global manifold.<n>We observe consistent hierarchical patterns and find that MSMA improves alignment metrics under multiple estimators.<n> Controlled interventions at different scales yield distinct and architecture-dependent effects on lexical diversity, sentence structure, and discourse coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T10:25:58Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis [55.13545823385091]
  Federated reinforcement learning (FedRL) enables collaborative learning while preserving data privacy by preventing direct data exchange between agents.<n>In real-world applications, each agent may experience slightly different transition dynamics, leading to inherent model mismatches.<n>We show that even moderate levels of information sharing significantly mitigate environment-specific errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T18:06:28Z)
• ParamMute: Suppressing Knowledge-Critical FFNs for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [91.20492150248106]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases.<n>We propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFN Suppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs.<n> Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T15:50:41Z)
• Generalization Bounds of Surrogate Policies for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [53.03951222945921]
  We analyze smoothed (perturbed) policies, adding controlled random perturbations to the direction used by the linear oracle.<n>Our main contribution is a generalization bound that decomposes the excess risk into perturbation bias, statistical estimation error, and optimization error.<n>We illustrate the scope of the results on applications such as vehicle scheduling, highlighting how smoothing enables both tractable training and controlled generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T12:00:30Z)
• Calibrating Reasoning in Language Models with Internal Consistency [18.24350001344488]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various reasoning tasks.<n>LLMs often generate text with obvious mistakes and contradictions.<n>In this work, we investigate reasoning in LLMs through the lens of internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T02:44:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.