Is Your Conditional Diffusion Model Actually Denoising?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18736v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:54:27 GMT
• Title: Is Your Conditional Diffusion Model Actually Denoising?
• Authors: Daniel Pfrommer, Zehao Dou, Christopher Scarvelis, Max Simchowitz, Ali Jadbabaie,
• Abstract summary: We study the inductive biases of diffusion models with a conditioning-variable.<n>We demonstrate that the deviation from an idealized denoising process occurs irrespective of the model capacity or amount of training data.
• Score: 35.496429577832416
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study the inductive biases of diffusion models with a conditioning-variable, which have seen widespread application as both text-conditioned generative image models and observation-conditioned continuous control policies. We observe that when these models are queried conditionally, their generations consistently deviate from the idealized "denoising" process upon which diffusion models are formulated, inducing disagreement between popular sampling algorithms (e.g. DDPM, DDIM). We introduce Schedule Deviation, a rigorous measure which captures the rate of deviation from a standard denoising process, and provide a methodology to compute it. Crucially, we demonstrate that the deviation from an idealized denoising process occurs irrespective of the model capacity or amount of training data. We posit that this phenomenon occurs due to the difficulty of bridging distinct denoising flows across different parts of the conditioning space and show theoretically how such a phenomenon can arise through an inductive bias towards smoothness.

Related papers

• Condition Errors Refinement in Autoregressive Image Generation with Diffusion Loss [56.120591983649824]
  We present a theoretical analysis of diffusion and autoregressive models with diffusion loss.<n>We show that patch denoising optimization in autoregressive models effectively mitigates condition errors and leads to a stable condition distribution.<n>We introduce a novel condition refinement approach based on Optimal Transport (OT) theory to address condition inconsistency''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T07:48:04Z)
• Mitigating the Noise Shift for Denoising Generative Models via Noise Awareness Guidance [54.88271057438763]
  Noise Awareness Guidance (NAG) is a correction method that explicitly steers sampling trajectories to remain consistent with the pre-defined noise schedule.<n>NAG consistently mitigates noise shift and substantially improves the generation quality of mainstream diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T13:31:34Z)
• Diffusion models under low-noise regime [3.729242965449096]
  We show that diffusion models are effective denoisers when the corruption level is small.<n>We quantify how training set size, data geometry, and model objective choice shape denoising trajectories.<n>This work starts to address gaps in our understanding of generative model reliability in practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T15:07:16Z)
• One More Step: A Versatile Plug-and-Play Module for Rectifying Diffusion Schedule Flaws and Enhancing Low-Frequency Controls [77.42510898755037]
  One More Step (OMS) is a compact network that incorporates an additional simple yet effective step during inference. OMS elevates image fidelity and harmonizes the dichotomy between training and inference, while preserving original model parameters. Once trained, various pre-trained diffusion models with the same latent domain can share the same OMS module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T12:02:42Z)
• Soft Mixture Denoising: Beyond the Expressive Bottleneck of Diffusion Models [76.46246743508651]
  We show that current diffusion models actually have an expressive bottleneck in backward denoising. We introduce soft mixture denoising (SMD), an expressive and efficient model for backward denoising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T12:03:32Z)
• Gradpaint: Gradient-Guided Inpainting with Diffusion Models [71.47496445507862]
  Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) have recently achieved remarkable results in conditional and unconditional image generation. We present GradPaint, which steers the generation towards a globally coherent image. We generalizes well to diffusion models trained on various datasets, improving upon current state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T09:36:24Z)
• ShiftDDPMs: Exploring Conditional Diffusion Models by Shifting Diffusion Trajectories [144.03939123870416]
  We propose a novel conditional diffusion model by introducing conditions into the forward process. We use extra latent space to allocate an exclusive diffusion trajectory for each condition based on some shifting rules. We formulate our method, which we call textbfShiftDDPMs, and provide a unified point of view on existing related methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-05T12:48:21Z)
• From Denoising Diffusions to Denoising Markov Models [38.33676858989955]
  Denoising diffusions are state-of-the-art generative models exhibiting remarkable empirical performance. We propose a unifying framework generalising this approach to a wide class of spaces and leading to an original extension of score matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T14:34:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.