On the Effectiveness of Instruction-Tuning Local LLMs for Identifying Software Vulnerabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20062v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 05:30:53 GMT
• Title: On the Effectiveness of Instruction-Tuning Local LLMs for Identifying Software Vulnerabilities
• Authors: Sangryu Park, Gihyuk Ko, Homook Cho,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) show significant promise in automating software vulnerability analysis.<n>Current approaches in using LLMs to automate vulnerability analysis mostly rely on using online API-based LLM services.<n>This paper addresses these limitations by reformulating the problem as Software Vulnerability Identification (SVI)<n>We show that instruct-tuned local models represent a more effective, secure, and practical approach for leveraging LLMs in real-world vulnerability management.
• Score: 0.7136933021609079
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show significant promise in automating software vulnerability analysis, a critical task given the impact of security failure of modern software systems. However, current approaches in using LLMs to automate vulnerability analysis mostly rely on using online API-based LLM services, requiring the user to disclose the source code in development. Moreover, they predominantly frame the task as a binary classification(vulnerable or not vulnerable), limiting potential practical utility. This paper addresses these limitations by reformulating the problem as Software Vulnerability Identification (SVI), where LLMs are asked to output the type of weakness in Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) IDs rather than simply indicating the presence or absence of a vulnerability. We also tackle the reliance on large, API-based LLMs by demonstrating that instruction-tuning smaller, locally deployable LLMs can achieve superior identification performance. In our analysis, instruct-tuning a local LLM showed better overall performance and cost trade-off than online API-based LLMs. Our findings indicate that instruct-tuned local models represent a more effective, secure, and practical approach for leveraging LLMs in real-world vulnerability management workflows.

Related papers

• Evaluating LLMs for One-Shot Patching of Real and Artificial Vulnerabilities [2.5190317156807924]
  We empirically evaluate the patching effectiveness and complementarity of several prominent Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our results reveal that LLMs patch real vulnerabilities more effectively compared to artificial ones.<n>Our analysis reveals significant variability across LLMs in terms of overlapping (multiple LLMs patching the same vulnerabilities) and complementarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T18:03:47Z)
• Large Language Model Unlearning for Source Code [65.42425213605114]
  PROD is a novel unlearning approach that enables LLMs to forget undesired code content while preserving their code generation capabilities.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates that PROD achieves superior balance between forget quality and model utility compared to existing unlearning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T16:27:59Z)
• Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks [88.84977282952602]
  A high volume of recent ML security literature focuses on attacks against aligned large language models (LLMs)<n>In this paper, we analyze security and privacy vulnerabilities that are unique to LLM agents.<n>We conduct a series of illustrative attacks on popular open-source and commercial agents, demonstrating the immediate practical implications of their vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T17:19:36Z)
• From Vulnerabilities to Remediation: A Systematic Literature Review of LLMs in Code Security [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for automating various programming tasks.<n>LLMs could introduce vulnerabilities unbeknown to the programmer.<n>When analyzing code, they could miss clear vulnerabilities or signal nonexistent ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T16:20:22Z)
• VulnLLMEval: A Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Software Vulnerability Detection and Patching [0.9208007322096533]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in tasks like code translation. This paper introduces VulnLLMEval, a framework designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and patching vulnerabilities in C code. Our study includes 307 real-world vulnerabilities extracted from the Linux kernel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T22:00:20Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Efficient Prompting for LLM-based Generative Internet of Things [88.84327500311464]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capacities on various tasks, and integrating the capacities of LLMs into the Internet of Things (IoT) applications has drawn much research attention recently. Due to security concerns, many institutions avoid accessing state-of-the-art commercial LLM services, requiring the deployment and utilization of open-source LLMs in a local network setting. We propose a LLM-based Generative IoT (GIoT) system deployed in the local network setting in this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T19:24:00Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Software Vulnerability Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study [1.03590082373586]
  We propose using large language models (LLMs) to assist in finding vulnerabilities in source code. The aim is to test multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and identify the best prompting strategies. We find that LLMs can pinpoint many more issues than traditional static analysis tools, outperforming traditional tools in terms of recall and F1 scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T14:59:19Z)
• Multitask-based Evaluation of Open-Source LLM on Software Vulnerability [2.7692028382314815]
  This paper proposes a pipeline for quantitatively evaluating interactive Large Language Models (LLMs) using publicly available datasets. We carry out an extensive technical evaluation of LLMs using Big-Vul covering four different common software vulnerability tasks. We find that the existing state-of-the-art approaches and pre-trained Language Models (LMs) are generally superior to LLMs in software vulnerability detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T15:52:05Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities [12.82645410161464]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of 16 pre-trained Large Language Models on 5,000 code samples from five diverse security datasets. Overall, LLMs show modest effectiveness in detecting vulnerabilities, obtaining an average accuracy of 62.8% and F1 score of 0.71 across datasets. We find that advanced prompting strategies that involve step-by-step analysis significantly improve performance of LLMs on real-world datasets in terms of F1 score (by upto 0.18 on average)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:17:20Z)
• Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs [59.596335292426105]
  This paper collects the first open-source dataset to evaluate safeguards in large language models. We train several BERT-like classifiers to achieve results comparable with GPT-4 on automatic safety evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T14:02:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.