Quantifying Laziness, Decoding Suboptimality, and Context Degradation in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20662v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT
• Title: Quantifying Laziness, Decoding Suboptimality, and Context Degradation in Large Language Models
• Authors: Yiqing Ma, Jung-Hua Liu,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit behavioral artifacts such as laziness, decoded suboptimality, and context degradation.<n>Our results indicate widespread laziness in satisfying complex multi-part instructions.<n>We suggest strategies to reduce laziness and bolster multi-instruction compliance.
• Score: 0.4511923587827302
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit behavioral artifacts such as laziness (premature truncation of responses or partial compliance with multi-part requests), decoding suboptimality (failure to select higher-quality sequences due to myopic decoding), and context degradation (forgetting or ignoring core instructions over long conversations). We conducted three controlled experiments (A, B, and C) to quantify these phenomena across several advanced LLMs (OpenAI GPT-4 variant, DeepSeek). Our results indicate widespread laziness in satisfying complex multi-part instructions: models frequently omitted required sections or failed to meet length requirements despite explicit prompting. However, we found limited evidence of decoding suboptimality in a simple reasoning task (the models' greedy answers appeared to align with their highest-confidence solution), and we observed surprising robustness against context degradation in a 200-turn chaotic conversation test - the models maintained key facts and instructions far better than expected. These findings suggest that while compliance with detailed instructions remains an open challenge, modern LLMs may internally mitigate some hypothesized failure modes (such as context forgetting) in straightforward retrieval scenarios. We discuss implications for reliability, relate our findings to prior work on instruction-following and long-context processing, and recommend strategies (such as self-refinement and dynamic prompting) to reduce laziness and bolster multi-instruction compliance.

Related papers

• On the Paradoxical Interference between Instruction-Following and Task Solving [50.75960598434753]
  Instruction following aims to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent by specifying explicit constraints on how tasks should be performed.<n>We reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon: instruction following can paradoxically interfere with LLMs' task-solving capability.<n>We propose a metric, SUSTAINSCORE, to quantify the interference of instruction following with task solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T17:48:56Z)
• KBQA-R1: Reinforcing Large Language Models for Knowledge Base Question Answering [64.62317305868264]
  We present textbfKBQA-R1, a framework that shifts the paradigm from text imitation to interaction optimization via Reinforcement Learning.<n>Treating KBQA as a multi-turn decision process, our model learns to navigate the knowledge base using a list of actions.<n>Experiments on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQuestions demonstrate that KBQA-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T17:45:42Z)
• Decomposition-Enhanced Training for Post-Hoc Attributions In Language Models [64.49342399229529]
  We argue that post-hoc attribution can be reframed as a reasoning problem, where answers are decomposed into constituent units, each tied to specific context.<n>We introduce DecompTune, a post-training method that teaches models to produce answer decompositions as intermediate reasoning steps.<n>Across extensive experiments and ablations, DecompTune substantially improves attribution quality, outperforming prior methods and matching or exceeding state-of-the-art frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T17:58:59Z)
• Code-driven Number Sequence Calculation: Enhancing the inductive Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [44.17697803306198]
  We introduce textitCodeSeq, a synthetic post-training dataset built from number sequences.<n>Our pipeline generates supervised fine data by reflecting on failed test cases and incorporating iterative corrections.<n> Experimental results show that the models trained with textitCodeSeq improve on various reasoning tasks and can preserve the models' OOD performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T12:29:40Z)
• Light-IF: Endowing LLMs with Generalizable Reasoning via Preview and Self-Checking for Complex Instruction Following [10.119219532863767]
  lazy reasoning during the thinking stage is the primary factor contributing to poor instruction adherence.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework designed to enable rigorous reasoning processes involving preview and self-checking.<n>Our Light-IF-32B model surpasses both larger open-source models such as DeepSeek-R1 and closed-source models like Doubao-1.6.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T07:42:00Z)
• ONLY: One-Layer Intervention Sufficiently Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [67.75439511654078]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have introduced a new paradigm for understanding and reasoning about image input through textual responses.<n>They face the persistent challenge of hallucination, which introduces practical weaknesses and raises concerns about their reliable deployment in real-world applications.<n>We propose ONLY, a training-free decoding approach that requires only a single query and a one-layer intervention during decoding, enabling efficient real-time deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T16:01:08Z)
• Resource-Friendly Dynamic Enhancement Chain for Multi-Hop Question Answering [21.077964610022313]
  This work proposes a novel framework called DEC (Dynamic Enhancement Chain)<n> DEC first decomposes complex questions into logically coherent subquestions to form a hallucination-free reasoning chain.<n>It then iteratively refines these subquestions through context-aware rewriting to generate effective query formulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T11:55:27Z)
• Token Constraint Decoding Improves Robustness on Question Answering for Large Language Models [4.078176555898098]
  We introduce and evaluate Token Constraint Decoding (TCD)<n>This simple yet effective inference-time algorithm enforces alignment between token-level predictions to enhance robustness in noisy settings.<n>Our findings establish TCD as a practical, model-agnostic approach for improving reasoning stability under real-world imperfections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T05:33:56Z)
• On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models [93.13542053835542]
  Performance of large language models (LLMs) is acutely sensitive to the phrasing of prompts. We introduce RobustAlpacaEval, a new benchmark that consists of semantically equivalent case-level queries. Experiments on RobustAlpacaEval with ChatGPT and six open-source LLMs from the Llama, Mistral, and Gemma families uncover substantial variability in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T13:40:38Z)
• Alice in Wonderland: Simple Tasks Showing Complete Reasoning Breakdown in State-Of-the-Art Large Language Models [13.532180752491954]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are often described as instances of foundation models that possess strong generalization obeying scaling laws.<n>We demonstrate here a dramatic breakdown of generalization and basic reasoning of all SOTA models claiming strong function.<n>We also observe strong overconfidence in the wrong solutions, expressed in form of plausible sounding explanation-like confabulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T07:43:33Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.