On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10248v4
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 09:48:52 GMT
• Title: On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models
• Authors: Bowen Cao, Deng Cai, Zhisong Zhang, Yuexian Zou, Wai Lam,
• Abstract summary: Performance of large language models (LLMs) is acutely sensitive to the phrasing of prompts. We introduce RobustAlpacaEval, a new benchmark that consists of semantically equivalent case-level queries. Experiments on RobustAlpacaEval with ChatGPT and six open-source LLMs from the Llama, Mistral, and Gemma families uncover substantial variability in model performance.
• Score: 93.13542053835542
• License:
• Abstract: The performance of large language models (LLMs) is acutely sensitive to the phrasing of prompts, which raises significant concerns about their reliability in real-world scenarios. Existing studies often divide prompts into task-level instructions and case-level inputs and primarily focus on evaluating and improving robustness against variations in tasks-level instructions. However, this setup fails to fully address the diversity of real-world user queries and assumes the existence of task-specific datasets. To address these limitations, we introduce RobustAlpacaEval, a new benchmark that consists of semantically equivalent case-level queries and emphasizes the importance of using the worst prompt performance to gauge the lower bound of model performance. Extensive experiments on RobustAlpacaEval with ChatGPT and six open-source LLMs from the Llama, Mistral, and Gemma families uncover substantial variability in model performance; for instance, a difference of 45.48% between the worst and best performance for the Llama-2-70B-chat model, with its worst performance dipping as low as 9.38%. We further illustrate the difficulty in identifying the worst prompt from both model-agnostic and model-dependent perspectives, emphasizing the absence of a shortcut to characterize the worst prompt. We also attempt to enhance the worst prompt performance using existing prompt engineering and prompt consistency methods, but find that their impact is limited. These findings underscore the need to create more resilient LLMs that can maintain high performance across diverse prompts. Data and code are available at https://github.com/cbwbuaa/On-the-Worst-Prompt- Performance-of-LLMs.

Related papers

• VERITAS: A Unified Approach to Reliability Evaluation [26.051109586419308]
  Large language models (LLMs) often fail to synthesize information from their context to generate an accurate response. VERITAS is a family of hallucination detection models designed to operate flexibly across diverse contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:53:25Z)
• WILT: A Multi-Turn, Memorization-Robust Inductive Logic Benchmark for LLMs [0.8883751685905831]
  We introduce the Wason Inductive Logic Test (WILT), a simple yet challenging multi-turn reasoning benchmark designed to resist memorization. Our findings reveal that LLMs struggle with this task, exhibiting distinct strengths and weaknesses. Despite these variations, the best-performing model achieves only 28% accuracy, highlighting a significant gap in LLM performance on complex multi-turn reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T18:29:13Z)
• QPO: Query-dependent Prompt Optimization via Multi-Loop Offline Reinforcement Learning [58.767866109043055]
  We introduce Query-dependent Prompt Optimization (QPO), which iteratively fine-tune a small pretrained language model to generate optimal prompts tailored to the input queries. We derive insights from offline prompting demonstration data, which already exists in large quantities as a by-product of benchmarking diverse prompts on open-sourced tasks. Experiments on various LLM scales and diverse NLP and math tasks demonstrate the efficacy and cost-efficiency of our method in both zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T03:06:48Z)
• Cleared for Takeoff? Compositional & Conditional Reasoning may be the Achilles Heel to (Flight-Booking) Language Agents [12.391420075730242]
  We study compositional and conditional reasoning, two cornerstones of human cognition, and introduce GroundCocoa. Our task involves aligning detailed user preferences with available flight options presented in a multiple-choice format. Results indicate a significant disparity in performance among current state-of-the-art LLMs with even the best performing model, GPT-4 Turbo, not exceeding 67% accuracy despite advanced prompting techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T17:36:26Z)
• RankPrompt: Step-by-Step Comparisons Make Language Models Better Reasoners [38.30539869264287]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various reasoning tasks. However, even state-of-the-art LLMs such as ChatGPT are prone to logical errors during their reasoning processes. We introduce RankPrompt, a new prompting method that enables LLMs to self-rank their responses without additional resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T02:34:18Z)
• Revisit Input Perturbation Problems for LLMs: A Unified Robustness Evaluation Framework for Noisy Slot Filling Task [18.623619585980688]
  We propose a unified robustness evaluation framework based on the slot-filling task to evaluate the dialogue understanding capability of large language models. Specifically, we construct a input perturbation evaluation dataset, Noise-LLM, which contains five types of single perturbation and four types of mixed perturbation data. Our aim is to assess how well various robustness methods of LLMs perform in real-world noisy scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:22:05Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RL [62.824464372594576]
  We aim to enhance arithmetic reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) through zero-shot prompt optimization. We identify a previously overlooked objective of query dependency in such optimization. We introduce Prompt-OIRL, which harnesses offline inverse reinforcement learning to draw insights from offline prompting demonstration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T01:12:52Z)
• OverPrompt: Enhancing ChatGPT through Efficient In-Context Learning [49.38867353135258]
  We propose OverPrompt, leveraging the in-context learning capability of LLMs to handle multiple task inputs. Our experiments show that OverPrompt can achieve cost-efficient zero-shot classification without causing significant detriment to task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:08:04Z)
• LLMs as Factual Reasoners: Insights from Existing Benchmarks and Beyond [135.8013388183257]
  We propose a new protocol for inconsistency detection benchmark creation and implement it in a 10-domain benchmark called SummEdits. Most LLMs struggle on SummEdits, with performance close to random chance. The best-performing model, GPT-4, is still 8% below estimated human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T21:50:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.