Reasoning-Driven Amodal Completion: Collaborative Agents and Perceptual Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20936v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 04:39:45 GMT
• Title: Reasoning-Driven Amodal Completion: Collaborative Agents and Perceptual Evaluation
• Authors: Hongxing Fan, Shuyu Zhao, Jiayang Ao, Lu Sheng,
• Abstract summary: We present a Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework that explicitly decouples Semantic Planning from Visual Synthesis.<n>Our method generates a structured, explicit plan before pixel generation, enabling visually and semantically coherent single-pass synthesis.<n>Addressing the limitations of traditional metrics in assessing inferred invisible content, we introduce the MAC-Score, a novel human-aligned evaluation metric.
• Score: 17.405818788700234
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Amodal completion, the task of inferring invisible object parts, faces significant challenges in maintaining semantic consistency and structural integrity. Prior progressive approaches are inherently limited by inference instability and error accumulation. To tackle these limitations, we present a Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework that explicitly decouples Semantic Planning from Visual Synthesis. By employing specialized agents for upfront reasoning, our method generates a structured, explicit plan before pixel generation, enabling visually and semantically coherent single-pass synthesis. We integrate this framework with two critical mechanisms: (1) a self-correcting Verification Agent that employs Chain-of-Thought reasoning to rectify visible region segmentation and identify residual occluders strictly within the Semantic Planning phase, and (2) a Diverse Hypothesis Generator that addresses the ambiguity of invisible regions by offering diverse, plausible semantic interpretations, surpassing the limited pixel-level variations of standard random seed sampling. Furthermore, addressing the limitations of traditional metrics in assessing inferred invisible content, we introduce the MAC-Score (MLLM Amodal Completion Score), a novel human-aligned evaluation metric. Validated against human judgment and ground truth, these metrics establish a robust standard for assessing structural completeness and semantic consistency with visible context. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple datasets. Our project is available at: https://fanhongxing.github.io/remac-page.

Related papers

• OMG-Agent: Toward Robust Missing Modality Generation with Decoupled Coarse-to-Fine Agentic Workflows [9.617220633655716]
  We present textbfunderlineOmni-textbfunderlineModality textbfunderlineGeneration Agent (textbfOMG-Agent)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T02:25:40Z)
• PRISM: Purified Representation and Integrated Semantic Modeling for Generative Sequential Recommendation [28.629759086187352]
  We propose a novel generative recommendation framework, PRISM, with Purified Representation and Integrated Semantic Modeling.<n>PRISM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T08:50:16Z)
• Non-Resolution Reasoning (NRR): A Computational Framework for Contextual Identity and Ambiguity Preservation [0.0]
  Current artificial intelligence systems exhibit a fundamental architectural limitation: they resolve ambiguity prematurely.<n>This premature semantic collapse stems from classical identity assumptions embedded in standard neural architectures.<n>We propose Non-Resolution Reasoning (NRR), a computational framework that treats ambiguity retention as a valid reasoning mode.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T16:14:32Z)
• METER: Multi-modal Evidence-based Thinking and Explainable Reasoning -- Algorithm and Benchmark [48.78602579128459]
  We introduce METER, a unified benchmark for interpretable forgery detection spanning images, videos, audio, and audio-visual content.<n>Our dataset comprises four tracks, each requiring not only real-vs-fake classification but also evidence-chain-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T03:42:51Z)
• Estimating Commonsense Plausibility through Semantic Shifts [66.06254418551737]
  We propose ComPaSS, a novel discriminative framework that quantifies commonsense plausibility by measuring semantic shifts.<n> Evaluations on two types of fine-grained commonsense plausibility estimation tasks show that ComPaSS consistently outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T06:31:06Z)
• Multi-task Visual Grounding with Coarse-to-Fine Consistency Constraints [15.541287957548771]
  We propose a Coarse-to-fine Consistency Constraints Visual Grounding architecture.<n>It integrates implicit and explicit modeling approaches within a two-stage framework.<n>It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art REC and RIS methods by a substantial margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T04:30:13Z)
• Tackling Ambiguity from Perspective of Uncertainty Inference and Affinity Diversification for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation [12.308473939796945]
  Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) with image-level labels aims to achieve dense tasks without laborious annotations. The performance of WSSS, especially the stages of generating Class Activation Maps (CAMs) and refining pseudo masks, widely suffers from ambiguity. We propose UniA, a unified single-staged WSSS framework, to tackle this issue from the perspective of uncertainty inference and affinity diversification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T01:54:59Z)
• Interpretable Automatic Fine-grained Inconsistency Detection in Text Summarization [56.94741578760294]
  We propose the task of fine-grained inconsistency detection, the goal of which is to predict the fine-grained types of factual errors in a summary. Motivated by how humans inspect factual inconsistency in summaries, we propose an interpretable fine-grained inconsistency detection model, FineGrainFact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T22:11:47Z)
• Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal Representation Learning [53.68371566336254]
  We argue that the key to better performance lies in meaningful latent modality structures instead of perfect modality alignment. Specifically, we design 1) a deep feature separation loss for intra-modality regularization; 2) a Brownian-bridge loss for inter-modality regularization; and 3) a geometric consistency loss for both intra- and inter-modality regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-10T14:38:49Z)
• Toward Certified Robustness Against Real-World Distribution Shifts [65.66374339500025]
  We train a generative model to learn perturbations from data and define specifications with respect to the output of the learned model. A unique challenge arising from this setting is that existing verifiers cannot tightly approximate sigmoid activations. We propose a general meta-algorithm for handling sigmoid activations which leverages classical notions of counter-example-guided abstraction refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T04:09:13Z)
• Dive into Ambiguity: Latent Distribution Mining and Pairwise Uncertainty Estimation for Facial Expression Recognition [59.52434325897716]
  We propose a solution, named DMUE, to address the problem of annotation ambiguity from two perspectives. For the former, an auxiliary multi-branch learning framework is introduced to better mine and describe the latent distribution in the label space. For the latter, the pairwise relationship of semantic feature between instances are fully exploited to estimate the ambiguity extent in the instance space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T03:21:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.