Making AI Work: An Autoethnography of a Workaround in Higher Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21055v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 08:48:18 GMT
• Title: Making AI Work: An Autoethnography of a Workaround in Higher Education
• Abstract summary: This study argues that user-driven workarounds should be understood as integral acts of sociotechnical integration.<n>Findings suggest that the invisible labour required to integrate GenAI within complex organisational politics is an important, rather than peripheral, component of how it becomes functional in practice.
• Score: 2.8437067145252217
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Research on the implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education often focuses on strategic goals, overlooking the hidden, and often politically charged, labour required to make it functional. This paper provides an insider's account of the sociotechnical friction that arises when an institutional goal of empowering non-technical staff conflicts with the technical limitations of enterprise Large Language Models (LLMs). Through analytic autoethnography, this study examines a GenAI project pushed to an impasse, focusing on a workaround developed to navigate not only technical constraints but also the combined challenge of organisational territoriality and assertions of positional power. Drawing upon Alter's (2014) theory of workarounds, the analysis interprets "articulation work" as a form of "invisible labour". By engaging with the Information Systems (IS) domains of user innovation and technology-in-practice, this study argues that such user-driven workarounds should be understood not as deviations, but as integral acts of sociotechnical integration. This integration, however, highlights the central paradoxes of modern GenAI where such workarounds for "unfinished" systems can simultaneously create unofficial "shadow" systems and obscure the crucial, yet invisible, sociotechnical labour involved. The findings suggest that the invisible labour required to integrate GenAI within complex organisational politics is an important, rather than peripheral, component of how it becomes functional in practice.

Related papers

• The Fabricated Front: Generative AI and the Opacity of Workplace Performance [0.0]
  We show that effort opacity is the systematic decoupling of observable output from human engagement.<n>We identify five opacity mechanisms through which workplace fronts are reorganized.<n>We show that professionals defend the identity mechanisms while freely producing opacity around the labor mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T22:52:13Z)
• Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods [56.14010017381489]
  This paper argues that the machine learning community must pivot from ad-hoc XAI methods toward addressing foundational & structural challenges.<n>We conclude by outlining a practical checklist designed to shift XAI toward a more human-centered, action-oriented paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T21:46:20Z)
• Generative AI as a Design Variable: An Evidence-Centered Framework for Principled Governance in STEM Assessment [4.027696535560039]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents a governance challenge for STEM assessment.<n>Unrestricted GenAI access enables task outsourcing that undermines the validity of traditional assessments.<n>This paper proposes a framework that treats GenAI as a design variable within the assessment argument rather than an external threat to it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T03:06:34Z)
• The Landscape of Generative AI in Information Systems: A Synthesis of Secondary Reviews and Research Agendas [31.27141835012598]
  Generative AI (GenAI) offers transformative potential for productivity and innovation, but its adoption is constrained by multiple interrelated challenges.<n>Interpreted through a socio-technical lens, these findings reveal a persistent misalignment between GenAI's technical subsystem and the slower-adapting social subsystem.<n>To bridge this gap, we discuss a research agenda that reorients IS scholarship from analyzing impacts toward actively shaping the co-evolution of technical capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T12:06:25Z)
• The Vibe-Automation of Automation: A Proactive Education Framework for Computer Science in the Age of Generative AI [0.7252027234425333]
  generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) represents a qualitative shift in computer science.<n>GenAI operates by navigating contextual, semantic, and coherence rather than optimizing predefined objective metrics.<n>The paper proposes a conceptual framework structured across three analytical levels and three domains of action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T06:02:04Z)
• Between Policy and Practice: GenAI Adoption in Agile Software Development Teams [3.4768202202649783]
  generative AI (GenAI) tools have begun to reshape various software engineering activities.<n>This study investigates how agile practitioners adopt GenAI tools in real-world organizational contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T20:04:56Z)
• The Workflow as Medium: A Framework for Navigating Human-AI Co-Creation [0.0]
  The Creative Intelligence Loop (CIL) is a novel socio-technical framework for responsible human-AI co-creation.<n>The CIL proposes a disciplined structure for dynamic human-AI collaboration, guiding the strategic integration of diverse AI teammates.<n>The CIL was empirically demonstrated through the practice-led creation of two graphic novellas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-22T20:36:13Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
• Position Paper: Towards Open Complex Human-AI Agents Collaboration Systems for Problem Solving and Knowledge Management [0.15039745292757667]
  We propose a technology-agnostic, collaboration-ready stance for Human-AI Agents Collaboration Systems (HAACS)<n>Reading empirical patterns through a seven-dimension collaboration spine and human-agent contrasts, we identify missing pieces.<n>We show interoperability with emerging agent protocols without ad hoc glue and sketch bio-cybernetic extensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T05:57:03Z)
• Cutting Through the Confusion and Hype: Understanding the True Potential of Generative AI [0.0]
  This paper explores the nuanced landscape of generative AI (genAI) It focuses on neural network-based models like Large Language Models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T02:18:44Z)
• Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
  generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications. New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z)
• Open Problems in Technical AI Governance [102.19067750759471]
  Technical AI governance refers to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI.<n>This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:13:56Z)
• Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade-Offs Around Generative Artificial Intelligence Use [12.85888736626468]
  We interviewed 17 knowledge workers, including faculty and students, to investigate the social and technical dimensions of generative AI (Gen AI)<n>Our participants raised concerns about the opacity of the data used to train Gen AI.<n>Participants recognized Gen AI's potential to democratize knowledge by accelerating the learning process and act as an accessible research assistant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T04:25:35Z)
• Combatting Human Trafficking in the Cyberspace: A Natural Language Processing-Based Methodology to Analyze the Language in Online Advertisements [55.2480439325792]
  This project tackles the pressing issue of human trafficking in online C2C marketplaces through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. We introduce a novel methodology for generating pseudo-labeled datasets with minimal supervision, serving as a rich resource for training state-of-the-art NLP models. A key contribution is the implementation of an interpretability framework using Integrated Gradients, providing explainable insights crucial for law enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T02:45:01Z)
• AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations [37.813441975457735]
  This study focuses on understanding the limitations of AutoML encountered by users in their real-world practices. Our findings reveal that users actively exercise user agency to overcome three major challenges arising from customizability, transparency, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T17:06:46Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.