The Fabricated Front: Generative AI and the Opacity of Workplace Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18369v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:52:13 GMT
• Title: The Fabricated Front: Generative AI and the Opacity of Workplace Performance
• Abstract summary: We show that effort opacity is the systematic decoupling of observable output from human engagement.<n>We identify five opacity mechanisms through which workplace fronts are reorganized.<n>We show that professionals defend the identity mechanisms while freely producing opacity around the labor mechanisms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) has become a fixture of workplace life. Current research asks chiefly what this implies for jobs and outputs, measured in productivity, displacement, or bias. What remains underexamined are the interactional reconfigurations that GenAI produces at work. The emerging concept of effort opacity has begun to fill this gap by highlighting the systematic decoupling of observable output from human engagement. When GenAI makes interactional cues less diagnostic, it weakens the reciprocal exchange that sustains collaborative trust. Extending this account of effort opacity, we examine the interactional mechanics that produce opacity in everyday workplace encounters. Drawing on Erving Goffman's dramaturgical framework and 1,250 interview transcripts from Anthropic's AI Interviewer dataset, we identify five opacity mechanisms through which workplace fronts are reorganized: voice (whose stance the words index), provenance (who can stand behind the artifact), vulnerability (whether the worker is uncertain), attention (whether the worker is engaged), and investment (how much labor the output reflects). We show that professionals defend the identity mechanisms while freely producing opacity around the labor mechanisms, and trace this asymmetry to the output-centered organization of contemporary work, where deliverables already stand in for the labor process that produced them. The governance task, accordingly, is one of involvement management: specifying which forms of human involvement (attention, effort, judgment) must remain inspectable, and to whom. Workplace AI policies built on universal disclosure will systematically misrecognize a social field in which inspectability is already audience-relative.

Related papers

• Atria Dawn: The Dawn of Agentic Superintelligence [237.73474618289063]
  We introduce Atria Dawn Preview, a foundation agentic language model designed for scientific research and engineering.<n>We examine the real research-and-development process behind this model as a case study of human--AI collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T16:22:30Z)
• When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
  We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z)
• The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation [107.84677954791773]
  We argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems.<n>In some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself.<n>This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:33:43Z)
• From Chatbot to Digital Colleague: The Paradigm Shift Toward Persistent Autonomous AI [74.72113315839412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are undergoing a fundamental transformation into integrated AI systems capable of reasoning, memory, and self-improvement.<n>We conceptualize this transition as a shift from episodic to Digital Colleague: from conversational answers to persistent work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T14:33:55Z)
• The LLM Fallacy: Misattribution in AI-Assisted Cognitive Workflows [3.354543153949287]
  We argue that large language models (LLMs) obscure the boundary between human and machine contribution, leading users to infer competence from outputs rather than processes that generate them.<n>We propose a conceptual framework of its underlying mechanisms and a typology of manifestations across computational, linguistic, analytical, and creative domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T09:30:28Z)
• From Future of Work to Future of Workers: Addressing Asymptomatic AI Harms for Dignified Human-AI Interaction [16.596741154139334]
  This paper shifts focus from the future of work to the future of workers by navigating the AI-as-Amplifier Paradox.<n>We present a year-long study on the longitudinal use of AI in a high-stakes workplace among cancer specialists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T16:13:41Z)
• Identifying Barriers Hindering the Acceptance of Generative AI as a Work Associate, measured with the new AGAWA scale [0.0]
  The attitudes of today's students toward generative AI (GenAI) will significantly influence its adoption in the workplace in the years to come.<n>We propose the AGAWA scale, which measures attitudes toward an artificial agent utilising GenAI and perceived as a coworker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T11:08:16Z)
• Making AI Work: An Autoethnography of a Workaround in Higher Education [2.8437067145252217]
  This study argues that user-driven workarounds should be understood as integral acts of sociotechnical integration.<n>Findings suggest that the invisible labour required to integrate GenAI within complex organisational politics is an important, rather than peripheral, component of how it becomes functional in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T08:48:18Z)
• WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks [85.95607119635102]
  Large language models (LLMs) can mimic human-like intelligence.<n>WorkArena++ is designed to evaluate the planning, problem-solving, logical/arithmetic reasoning, retrieval, and contextual understanding abilities of web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T07:15:49Z)
• The Impact of AI on Perceived Job Decency and Meaningfulness: A Case Study [3.9134031118910264]
  This paper explores the impact of AI on job decency and meaningfulness in workplaces. Findings reveal that respondents visualize a workplace where humans continue to play a dominant role, even with the introduction of advanced AIs. respondents believe that the introduction of AI will maintain or potentially increase overall job satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T12:52:57Z)
• Human-Robot Collaboration and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Recent Research [69.48907856390834]
  Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is the approach that explores the interaction between a human and a robot. This paper proposes a thorough literature review of the use of machine learning techniques in the context of HRC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T15:14:33Z)
• Distribution Matching for Heterogeneous Multi-Task Learning: a Large-scale Face Study [75.42182503265056]
  Multi-Task Learning has emerged as a methodology in which multiple tasks are jointly learned by a shared learning algorithm. We deal with heterogeneous MTL, simultaneously addressing detection, classification & regression problems. We build FaceBehaviorNet, the first framework for large-scale face analysis, by jointly learning all facial behavior tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-08T22:26:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.