TCEval: Using Thermal Comfort to Assess Cognitive and Perceptual Abilities of AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23217v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 05:41:25 GMT
- Title: TCEval: Using Thermal Comfort to Assess Cognitive and Perceptual Abilities of AI
- Authors: Jingming Li,
- Abstract summary: Thermal comfort serves as an ideal paradigm for evaluating real-world cognitive capabilities of AI systems.<n>We propose TCEval, the first evaluation framework that assesses three core cognitive capacities of AI.
- Score: 0.5366500153474746
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: A critical gap exists in LLM task-specific benchmarks. Thermal comfort, a sophisticated interplay of environmental factors and personal perceptions involving sensory integration and adaptive decision-making, serves as an ideal paradigm for evaluating real-world cognitive capabilities of AI systems. To address this, we propose TCEval, the first evaluation framework that assesses three core cognitive capacities of AI, cross-modal reasoning, causal association, and adaptive decision-making, by leveraging thermal comfort scenarios and large language model (LLM) agents. The methodology involves initializing LLM agents with virtual personality attributes, guiding them to generate clothing insulation selections and thermal comfort feedback, and validating outputs against the ASHRAE Global Database and Chinese Thermal Comfort Database. Experiments on four LLMs show that while agent feedback has limited exact alignment with humans, directional consistency improves significantly with a 1 PMV tolerance. Statistical tests reveal that LLM-generated PMV distributions diverge markedly from human data, and agents perform near-randomly in discrete thermal comfort classification. These results confirm the feasibility of TCEval as an ecologically valid Cognitive Turing Test for AI, demonstrating that current LLMs possess foundational cross-modal reasoning ability but lack precise causal understanding of the nonlinear relationships between variables in thermal comfort. TCEval complements traditional benchmarks, shifting AI evaluation focus from abstract task proficiency to embodied, context-aware perception and decision-making, offering valuable insights for advancing AI in human-centric applications like smart buildings.
Related papers
- Know What You Know: Metacognitive Entropy Calibration for Verifiable RL Reasoning [31.629261193485053]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex real-world tasks.<n>Most existing outcome-only RLVR pipelines rely almost exclusively on a binary correctness signal and largely ignore the model's intrinsic uncertainty.<n>We propose EGPO, a metacognitive entropy calibration framework that explicitly integrates intrinsic uncertainty into RLVR for enhancing LRMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T08:40:06Z) - E^2-LLM: Bridging Neural Signals and Interpretable Affective Analysis [54.763420895859035]
We present ELLM2-EEG-to-Emotion Large Language Model, first MLLM framework for interpretable emotion analysis from EEG.<n>ELLM integrates a pretrained EEG encoder with Q-based LLMs through learnable projection layers, employing a multi-stage training pipeline.<n>Experiments on the dataset across seven emotion categories demonstrate that ELLM2-EEG-to-Emotion Large Language Model achieves excellent performance on emotion classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-11T13:21:20Z) - SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z) - Smart but Costly? Benchmarking LLMs on Functional Accuracy and Energy Efficiency [5.771786260272727]
We present a framework, BRACE, to benchmark Code Language Models on a unified scale of energy efficiency and functional correctness.<n>We propose two rating methods: Concentric Incremental Rating Circles (CIRC) and Observation to Expectation Rating (OTER)<n>Our analysis reveals models generally perform better in the code summarization tasks as they are not enforced to generate a grammar-based and syntactically correct output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T23:44:48Z) - Agentic AI Reasoning for Mobile Edge General Intelligence: Fundamentals, Approaches, and Directions [74.35421055079655]
Large language models (LLMs) have enabled an emergence of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) with powerful reasoning and autonomous decision-making capabilities.<n>Mobile Edge General Intelligence (MEGI) brings real-time, privacy-preserving reasoning to the network edge.<n>We propose a joint optimization framework for efficient LLM reasoning deployment in MEGI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T10:53:48Z) - Synthetic Founders: AI-Generated Social Simulations for Startup Validation Research in Computational Social Science [0.0]
We compare human-subject interview data with large language model (LLM)-driven synthetic personas to evaluate fidelity, divergence, and blind spots in AI-enabled simulation.<n>We interpret this comparative framework as evidence that LLM-driven personas constitute a form of hybrid social simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-29T21:54:53Z) - STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z) - Evaluating AI Alignment in Eleven LLMs through Output-Based Analysis and Human Benchmarking [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in psychological research and practice, yet traditional benchmarks reveal little about the values they express in real interaction.<n>We introduce PAPERS, output-based evaluation of the values LLMs express.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-14T20:14:02Z) - A Cognitive-Mechanistic Human Reliability Analysis Framework: A Nuclear Power Plant Case Study [7.583754429526051]
This study proposes a cognitive-mechanistic framework (COGMIF) that enhances the IDHEAS-ECA methodology.<n>It integrates an ACT-R-based human digital twin (HDT) with TimeGAN-augmented simulation.<n>TimeGAN is trained on ACT-R-generated time-series data to produce high-fidelity synthetic operator behavior datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-25T00:46:00Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks.
We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level.
We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z) - How Far Are LLMs from Believable AI? A Benchmark for Evaluating the Believability of Human Behavior Simulation [46.42384207122049]
We design SimulateBench to evaluate the believability of large language models (LLMs) when simulating human behaviors.
Based on SimulateBench, we evaluate the performances of 10 widely used LLMs when simulating characters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T16:51:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.