Retrieval Augmented Question Answering: When Should LLMs Admit Ignorance?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23836v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 19:59:10 GMT
• Title: Retrieval Augmented Question Answering: When Should LLMs Admit Ignorance?
• Authors: Dingmin Wang, Ji Ma, Shankar Kumar,
• Abstract summary: Long contexts introduce more irrelevant information that hinders the model's generation process and degrades its performance.<n>We design an adaptive prompting strategy which involves splitting the retrieved information into smaller chunks and sequentially prompting a LLM to answer the question.<n> Experimental results on three open-domain question answering datasets demonstrate that the adaptive strategy matches the performance of standard prompting.
• Score: 13.893751277489294
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The success of expanded context windows in Large Language Models (LLMs) has driven increased use of broader context in retrieval-augmented generation. We investigate the use of LLMs for retrieval augmented question answering. While longer contexts make it easier to incorporate targeted knowledge, they introduce more irrelevant information that hinders the model's generation process and degrades its performance. To address the issue, we design an adaptive prompting strategy which involves splitting the retrieved information into smaller chunks and sequentially prompting a LLM to answer the question using each chunk. Adjusting the chunk size allows a trade-off between incorporating relevant information and reducing irrelevant information. Experimental results on three open-domain question answering datasets demonstrate that the adaptive strategy matches the performance of standard prompting while using fewer tokens. Our analysis reveals that when encountering insufficient information, the LLM often generates incorrect answers instead of declining to respond, which constitutes a major source of error. This finding highlights the need for further research into enhancing LLMs' ability to effectively decline requests when faced with inadequate information.

Related papers

• Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
  We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework.<n>This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings.<n>Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z)
• KBM: Delineating Knowledge Boundary for Adaptive Retrieval in Large Language Models [69.99274367773997]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with dynamically changing knowledge and handling unknown static information.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is employed to tackle these challenges and has a significant impact on improving LLM performance.<n>We propose a Knowledge Boundary Model (KBM) to express the known/unknown of a given question, and to determine whether a RAG needs to be triggered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T15:12:28Z)
• Sufficient Context: A New Lens on Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [19.238772793096473]
  Augmenting LLMs with context leads to improved performance across many applications.<n>We develop a new notion of sufficient context, along with a method to classify instances that have enough information to answer the query.<n>By stratifying errors based on context sufficiency, we find that larger models with higher baseline performance excel at answering queries when the context is sufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T02:13:14Z)
• Utilize the Flow before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning [68.57166425493283]
  Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning (RAIT) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to refuse to answer unknown questions.<n>This crude approach can cause LLMs to excessively refuse answering questions they could have correctly answered.<n>We introduce Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instructions Tuning (CRaFT) to address this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:12:51Z)
• When to Retrieve: Teaching LLMs to Utilize Information Retrieval Effectively [3.705145020383824]
  We show how Large Language Models (LLMs) can learn to use an off-the-shelf information retrieval (IR) system specifically when additional context is required to answer a given question.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T16:52:55Z)
• CuriousLLM: Elevating Multi-Document Question Answering with LLM-Enhanced Knowledge Graph Reasoning [0.9295048974480845]
  We propose CuriousLLM, an enhancement that integrates a curiosity-driven reasoning mechanism into an LLM agent.<n>This mechanism enables the agent to generate relevant follow-up questions, thereby guiding the information retrieval process more efficiently.<n>Our experiments show that CuriousLLM significantly boosts LLM performance in multi-document question answering (MD-QA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T20:43:46Z)
• Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
  This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model. We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers. Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• Investigating Answerability of LLMs for Long-Form Question Answering [35.41413072729483]
  We focus on long-form question answering (LFQA) because it has several practical and impactful applications. We propose a question-generation method from abstractive summaries and show that generating follow-up questions from summaries of long documents can create a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T07:22:56Z)
• Enhancing In-Context Learning with Answer Feedback for Multi-Span Question Answering [9.158919909909146]
  In this paper, we propose a novel way of employing labeled data such as it informs LLM of some undesired output. Experiments on three multi-span question answering datasets and a keyphrase extraction dataset show that our new prompting strategy consistently improves LLM's in-context learning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T15:20:24Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.