KBM: Delineating Knowledge Boundary for Adaptive Retrieval in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06207v2
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:21:24 GMT
• Title: KBM: Delineating Knowledge Boundary for Adaptive Retrieval in Large Language Models
• Authors: Zhen Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Yong Jiang, Zile Qiao, Zhuo Chen, Guangyu Li, Feiteng Mu, Mengting Hu, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with dynamically changing knowledge and handling unknown static information.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is employed to tackle these challenges and has a significant impact on improving LLM performance.<n>We propose a Knowledge Boundary Model (KBM) to express the known/unknown of a given question, and to determine whether a RAG needs to be triggered.
• Score: 69.99274367773997
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with dynamically changing knowledge and handling unknown static information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is employed to tackle these challenges and has a significant impact on improving LLM performance. In fact, we find that not all questions need to trigger RAG. By retrieving parts of knowledge unknown to the LLM and allowing the LLM to answer the rest, we can effectively reduce both time and computational costs. In our work, we propose a Knowledge Boundary Model (KBM) to express the known/unknown of a given question, and to determine whether a RAG needs to be triggered. Experiments conducted on 11 English and Chinese datasets illustrate that the KBM effectively delineates the knowledge boundary, significantly decreasing the proportion of retrievals required for optimal end-to-end performance. Furthermore, we evaluate the effectiveness of KBM in three complex scenarios: dynamic knowledge, long-tail static knowledge, and multi-hop problems, as well as its functionality as an external LLM plug-in.

Related papers

• Improving Factuality in LLMs via Inference-Time Knowledge Graph Construction [30.381290814338413]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with producing factually consistent answers due to limitations in their parametric memory.<n>We propose a novel framework that dynamically constructs and expands knowledge graphs (KGs) during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-31T16:36:40Z)
• DySK-Attn: A Framework for Efficient, Real-Time Knowledge Updating in Large Language Models via Dynamic Sparse Knowledge Attention [2.168994673914057]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from a critical limitation: their knowledge is static and quickly becomes outdated.<n>We propose DySK-Attn, a novel framework that enables LLMs to efficiently integrate real-time knowledge from a dynamic external source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T05:22:38Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models with Partial Knowledge for Answering Questions with Unseen Entities [43.88784275673178]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) shows impressive performance by supplementing and substituting parametric knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We show how triplets located in the gold reasoning path and their variants are used to construct partially relevant knowledge by removing the path that contains the answer.<n>Our awakening-based approach demonstrates greater efficacy in practical applications, outperforms traditional methods that rely on embedding-based similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T09:54:46Z)
• An Analysis of Decoding Methods for LLM-based Agents for Faithful Multi-Hop Question Answering [44.41915467956464]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently produce factually inaccurate outputs. This phenomenon limits their accuracy in knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Recent research has explored training-free decoding strategies to improve the faithfulness of model generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T12:18:21Z)
• When Machine Unlearning Meets Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Keep Secret or Forget Knowledge? [27.718577066105485]
  Large language models (LLMs) can inadvertently learn and retain sensitive information and harmful content during training.<n>We propose a lightweight behavioral unlearning framework based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology.<n>We evaluate our framework through extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source models, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama-2-7b-chat, and PaLM 2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T03:51:01Z)
• FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
  We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications. FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering Involving Long-tail Facts [50.06633829833144]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective in performing various NLP tasks, but struggle to handle tasks that require extensive, real-world knowledge. We propose a benchmark that requires knowledge of long-tail facts for answering the involved questions. Our experiments show that LLMs alone struggle with answering these questions, especially when the long-tail level is high or rich knowledge is required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T15:10:20Z)
• Find The Gap: Knowledge Base Reasoning For Visual Question Answering [19.6585442152102]
  We analyze knowledge-based visual question answering, for which given a question, the models need to ground it into the visual modality. Our results demonstrate the positive impact of empowering task-specific and LLM models with supervised external and visual knowledge retrieval models. Our findings show that though LLMs are stronger in 1-hop reasoning, they suffer in 2-hop reasoning in comparison with our fine-tuned NN model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T02:11:46Z)
• LLM In-Context Recall is Prompt Dependent [0.0]
  A model's ability to do this significantly influences its practical efficacy and dependability in real-world applications. This study demonstrates that an LLM's recall capability is not only contingent upon the prompt's content but also may be compromised by biases in its training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T01:13:59Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs: Tasks, Methods, and Challenges [11.228131492745842]
  Large language models (LLMs) have spurred a new research paradigm in natural language processing. Despite their excellent capability in knowledge-based question answering and reasoning, their potential to retain faulty or even harmful knowledge poses risks of malicious application. Knowledge unlearning, derived from analogous studies on machine unlearning, presents a promising avenue to address this concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T12:37:51Z)
• Self-Knowledge Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Large Language Models [59.771098292611846]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown superior performance without task-specific fine-tuning. Retrieval-based methods can offer non-parametric world knowledge and improve the performance on tasks such as question answering. Self-Knowledge guided Retrieval augmentation (SKR) is a simple yet effective method which can let LLMs refer to the questions they have previously encountered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T04:22:33Z)
• Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation [109.8527403904657]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their knowledge and cannot handle the conflict between internal and external knowledge well. Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries. We propose a simple method to dynamically utilize supporting documents with our judgement strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z)
• Thrust: Adaptively Propels Large Language Models with External Knowledge [58.72867916604562]
  Large-scale pre-trained language models (PTLMs) are shown to encode rich knowledge in their model parameters. The inherent knowledge in PTLMs can be opaque or static, making external knowledge necessary. We propose the instance-level adaptive propulsion of external knowledge (IAPEK), where we only conduct the retrieval when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T20:16:46Z)
• When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories [58.3421305091187]
  This paper aims to understand LMs' strengths and limitations in memorizing factual knowledge. We find that LMs struggle with less popular factual knowledge, and that scaling fails to appreciably improve memorization of factual knowledge in the long tail. We devise a simple, yet effective, method for powerful and efficient retrieval-augmented LMs, which retrieves non-parametric memories only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:30:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.