Exposed: Shedding Blacklight on Online Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24041v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 07:31:48 GMT
• Title: Exposed: Shedding Blacklight on Online Privacy
• Authors: Lucas Shen, Gaurav Sood,
• Abstract summary: We combine passively observed, anonymized browsing data of a large, representative sample of Americans with domain-level data on tracking from Blacklight.<n>We find that nearly all users encounter at least one ad tracker or third-party cookie over the observation window.<n>Linking trackers to their parent organizations reveals that a single organization, usually Google, can track over $50%$ of web activity of more than half the users.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: To what extent are users surveilled on the web, by what technologies, and by whom? We answer these questions by combining passively observed, anonymized browsing data of a large, representative sample of Americans with domain-level data on tracking from Blacklight. We find that nearly all users ($ > 99\%$) encounter at least one ad tracker or third-party cookie over the observation window. More invasive techniques like session recording, keylogging, and canvas fingerprinting are less widespread, but over half of the users visited a site employing at least one of these within the first 48 hours of the start of tracking. Linking trackers to their parent organizations reveals that a single organization, usually Google, can track over $50\%$ of web activity of more than half the users. Demographic differences in exposure are modest and often attenuate when we account for browsing volume. However, disparities by age and race remain, suggesting that what users browse, not just how much, shapes their surveillance risk.

Related papers

• Fingerprinting and Tracing Shadows: The Development and Impact of Browser Fingerprinting on Digital Privacy [55.2480439325792]
  Browser fingerprinting is a growing technique for identifying and tracking users online without traditional methods like cookies. This paper gives an overview by examining the various fingerprinting techniques and analyzes the entropy and uniqueness of the collected data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T20:32:31Z)
• How Unique is Whose Web Browser? The role of demographics in browser fingerprinting among US users [50.699390248359265]
  Browser fingerprinting can be used to identify and track users across the Web, even without cookies. This technique and resulting privacy risks have been studied for over a decade. We provide a first-of-its-kind dataset to enable further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:51:58Z)
• Are LLM-based methods good enough for detecting unfair terms of service? [67.49487557224415]
  Large language models (LLMs) are good at parsing long text-based documents. We build a dataset consisting of 12 questions applied individually to a set of privacy policies. Some open-source models are able to provide a higher accuracy compared to some commercial models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T09:26:59Z)
• Characterizing Browser Fingerprinting and its Mitigations [0.0]
  This work explores one of these tracking techniques: browser fingerprinting. We detail how browser fingerprinting works, how prevalent it is, and what defenses can mitigate it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T20:31:24Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• Multi-view Tracking Using Weakly Supervised Human Motion Prediction [60.972708589814125]
  We argue that an even more effective approach is to predict people motion over time and infer people's presence in individual frames from these. This enables to enforce consistency both over time and across views of a single temporal frame. We validate our approach on the PETS2009 and WILDTRACK datasets and demonstrate that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T17:58:23Z)
• The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative [76.46529413546725]
  We show an Onion Effect of memorization: removing the "layer" of outlier points that are most vulnerable exposes a new layer of previously-safe points to the same attack. It suggests that privacy-enhancing technologies such as machine unlearning could actually harm the privacy of other users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T15:25:56Z)
• Differential Tracking Across Topical Webpages of Indian News Media [3.721918008485747]
  We propose a novel method for automatic extraction and categorization of Indian news topical subpages based on the details in their URLs. We find differential user tracking among subpages, and between subpages and homepages. embedded third-parties tend to track specific subpages simultaneously, revealing possible user profiling in action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T20:20:47Z)
• User Tracking in the Post-cookie Era: How Websites Bypass GDPR Consent to Track Users [3.936965297430477]
  We investigate whether websites use persistent and sophisticated forms of tracking in order to track users who said they do not want cookies. Our results suggest that websites do use such modern forms of tracking even before users had the opportunity to register their choice with respect to cookies. As a result, users' choices play very little role with respect to tracking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T14:11:10Z)
• Stop Tracking Me Bro! Differential Tracking Of User Demographics On Hyper-partisan Websites [5.690539268996364]
  We take a first step to shed light and measure potential differences in tracking imposed on users when visiting specific party-line's websites. This methodology allows us to create user personas with specific attributes like gender and age and automate their browsing behavior. We test 9 personas on 556 hyper-partisan websites and find that right-leaning websites tend to track users more intensely than left-leaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T18:35:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.