Characterizing Browser Fingerprinting and its Mitigations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12197v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 20:31:24 GMT
• Title: Characterizing Browser Fingerprinting and its Mitigations
• Authors: Alisha Ukani,
• Abstract summary: This work explores one of these tracking techniques: browser fingerprinting. We detail how browser fingerprinting works, how prevalent it is, and what defenses can mitigate it.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: People are becoming increasingly concerned with their online privacy, especially with how advertising companies track them across websites (a practice called cross-site tracking), as reconstructing a user's browser history can reveal sensitive information. Recent legislation like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act have tried to limit the extent to which third parties perform cross-site tracking, and browsers have also made tracking more difficult by deprecating the most-common tracking mechanism: third-party cookies. However, online advertising companies continue to track users through other mechanisms that do not rely on cookies. This work explores one of these tracking techniques: browser fingerprinting. We detail how browser fingerprinting works, how prevalent it is, and what defenses can mitigate it.

Related papers

• Browsing without Third-Party Cookies: What Do You See? [5.181502547611254]
  Third-party web cookies are often used for privacy-invasive behavior tracking. To understand the effects of such third-party cookieless browsing, we crawled and measured the top 10,000 Tranco websites. We develop a framework to remove third-party cookies and analyze the differences between the appearance of web pages with and without these cookies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:47:43Z)
• How Unique is Whose Web Browser? The role of demographics in browser fingerprinting among US users [50.699390248359265]
  Browser fingerprinting can be used to identify and track users across the Web, even without cookies. This technique and resulting privacy risks have been studied for over a decade. We provide a first-of-its-kind dataset to enable further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:51:58Z)
• Identified-and-Targeted: The First Early Evidence of the Privacy-Invasive Use of Browser Fingerprinting for Online Tracking [10.98528003128308]
  It is imperative to address the mounting concerns regarding the utilization of browser fingerprinting in the realm of online advertising. This paper introduces a new framework FPTrace'' designed to identify alterations in advertisements resulting from adjustments in browser fingerprinting settings. Using FPTrace we conduct a large-scale measurement study to identify whether browser fingerprinting is being used for the purpose of user tracking and ad targeting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T01:39:16Z)
• A first look into Utiq: Next-generation cookies at the ISP level [3.434440572295625]
  Third-party cookies have been widely used for years, they have also been criticized for their potential impact on user privacy. Many browsers allow users to block third-party cookies, which limits their usefulness for advertisers. We take a first look at Utiq, a new way of user tracking performed directly by the ISP, to substitute the third-party cookies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T09:23:59Z)
• Keep your Identity Small: Privacy-preserving Client-side Fingerprinting [0.0]
  Device fingerprinting is a widely used technique that allows a third party to identify a particular device. One of its most widespread uses is to identify users visiting different websites and thus build their browsing history. This constitutes a specific type of web tracking that poses a threat to users' privacy. We propose Privacy-preserving Client-side Fingerprinting (PCF), a new method that allows device fingerprinting on the web, while blocks the possibility of performing web tracking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T09:45:29Z)
• TeD-SPAD: Temporal Distinctiveness for Self-supervised Privacy-preservation for video Anomaly Detection [59.04634695294402]
  Video anomaly detection (VAD) without human monitoring is a complex computer vision task. Privacy leakage in VAD allows models to pick up and amplify unnecessary biases related to people's personal information. We propose TeD-SPAD, a privacy-aware video anomaly detection framework that destroys visual private information in a self-supervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T22:42:55Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative [76.46529413546725]
  We show an Onion Effect of memorization: removing the "layer" of outlier points that are most vulnerable exposes a new layer of previously-safe points to the same attack. It suggests that privacy-enhancing technologies such as machine unlearning could actually harm the privacy of other users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T15:25:56Z)
• SPAct: Self-supervised Privacy Preservation for Action Recognition [73.79886509500409]
  Existing approaches for mitigating privacy leakage in action recognition require privacy labels along with the action labels from the video dataset. Recent developments of self-supervised learning (SSL) have unleashed the untapped potential of the unlabeled data. We present a novel training framework which removes privacy information from input video in a self-supervised manner without requiring privacy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T02:56:40Z)
• Analysis of Longitudinal Changes in Privacy Behavior of Android Applications [79.71330613821037]
  In this paper, we examine the trends in how Android apps have changed over time with respect to privacy. We examine the adoption of HTTPS, whether apps scan the device for other installed apps, the use of permissions for privacy-sensitive data, and the use of unique identifiers. We find that privacy-related behavior has improved with time as apps continue to receive updates, and that the third-party libraries used by apps are responsible for more issues with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T16:21:31Z)
• User Tracking in the Post-cookie Era: How Websites Bypass GDPR Consent to Track Users [3.936965297430477]
  We investigate whether websites use persistent and sophisticated forms of tracking in order to track users who said they do not want cookies. Our results suggest that websites do use such modern forms of tracking even before users had the opportunity to register their choice with respect to cookies. As a result, users' choices play very little role with respect to tracking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T14:11:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.