PDPL Metric: Validating a Scale to Measure Personal Data Privacy Literacy Among University Students

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00715v1
• Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 15:12:00 GMT
• Title: PDPL Metric: Validating a Scale to Measure Personal Data Privacy Literacy Among University Students
• Abstract summary: This study introduces and validates a new psychometric scale designed to measure data privacy literacy among university students.<n>A 24-item questionnaire was developed and administered to students at U.S.-based research universities.<n>No differences in PDPL were found based on basic demographic variables like academic level and gender.
• Score: 2.7687863557017853
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Personal data privacy literacy (PDPL) refers to a collection of digital literacy skills related to an individuals ability to understand, evaluate, and manage the collection, use, and protection of personal data in online and digital environments. This study introduces and validates a new psychometric scale (PDPL Metric) designed to measure data privacy literacy among university students, focusing on six key privacy constructs: perceived risk of data misuse, expectations of informed consent, general privacy concern, privacy management awareness, privacy-utility trade-off acceptance, and perceived importance of data security. A 24-item questionnaire was developed and administered to students at U.S.-based research universities. Principal components analysis confirmed the unidimensionality and internal consistency of each construct, and a second-order analysis supported the integration of all six into a unified PDPL construct. No differences in PDPL were found based on basic demographic variables like academic level and gender, although a difference was found based on domestic/international status. The findings of this study offer a validated framework for assessing personal data privacy literacy within the higher education context and support the integration of the core constructs into higher education programs, organizational policies, and digital literacy initiatives on university campuses.

Related papers

• PEARL: A Task-Aware Framework for Evaluating Differentially Private Synthetic Educational Data [3.8111836974655957]
  Differentially private (DP) synthetic data can support system development and educational research while reducing exposure of individual learners.<n>We introduce PEARL (Privacy-Equivalence Audit and Release Ledger), which approves a DP synthetic educational dataset only when it passes all required checks of validity, privacy protection, predictive usefulness, and suitability for the intended educational task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T14:12:48Z)
• Towards Personalized Differentially Private Learning for Decentralized Local Graphs [62.244412935520025]
  Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a promising solution for privacy-preserving data collection without relying on trusted servers.<n>Existing LDP-based graph learning methods typically assume uniform privacy requirements across users.<n>We propose PPGNN, a personalized differentially private framework for decentralized graph data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T08:07:48Z)
• Privacy Preserving Machine Learning Workflow: from Anonymization to Personalized Differential Privacy Budgets in Federated Learning [0.0]
  federated learning enables model training on decentralized data preventing their sharing and centralization.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive privacy preserving federated learning workflow for sensitive data, including anonymization and differential privacy techniques.<n>We show that the approach based on personalized budgets, compared to the architecture including global differential privacy with fixed privacy budget, achieves a better model performance in terms of two error metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T09:15:10Z)
• PrivATE: Differentially Private Average Treatment Effect Estimation for Observational Data [49.35645194884526]
  We introduce PrivATE, a practical ATE estimation framework that ensures differential privacy.<n>We design two levels (i.e., label-level and sample-level) of privacy protection in PrivATE to accommodate different privacy requirements.<n>PrivATE effectively balances noise-induced error and matching error, leading to a more accurate estimate of ATE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T16:30:07Z)
• Differential Privacy in Machine Learning: From Symbolic AI to LLMs [49.1574468325115]
  Differential privacy provides a formal framework to mitigate privacy risks.<n>It ensures that the inclusion or exclusion of any single data point does not significantly alter the output of an algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T11:30:35Z)
• Understanding the Relationship Between Personal Data Privacy Literacy and Data Privacy Information Sharing by University Students [1.6791044863781392]
  This survey based study examines how university students in the United States perceive personal data privacy.<n>Students responses to a privacy literacy scale were categorized into high and low privacy literacy groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T21:14:53Z)
• Benchmarking Vision Language Model Unlearning via Fictitious Facial Identity Dataset [92.99416966226724]
  We introduce Facial Identity Unlearning Benchmark (FIUBench), a novel VLM unlearning benchmark designed to robustly evaluate the effectiveness of unlearning algorithms.<n>We apply a two-stage evaluation pipeline that is designed to precisely control the sources of information and their exposure levels.<n>Through the evaluation of four baseline VLM unlearning algorithms within FIUBench, we find that all methods remain limited in their unlearning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T23:26:10Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Federated Transfer Learning with Differential Privacy [21.50525027559563]
  Federated learning has emerged as a powerful framework for analysing distributed data.<n>In this paper, we aim to enhance learning on a target data set by leveraging information from multiple heterogeneous source data sets.<n>We rigorously formulate the notion of federated differential privacy, which offers privacy guarantees for each data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T21:04:48Z)
• Pencil: Private and Extensible Collaborative Learning without the Non-Colluding Assumption [24.339382371386876]
  Pencil is the first private training framework for collaborative learning that simultaneously offers data privacy, model privacy, and extensibility to multiple data providers. We introduce several novel cryptographic protocols to realize this design principle and conduct a rigorous security and privacy analysis. Pencil achieves 10 260x higher throughput and 2 orders of magnitude less communication than prior art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T10:26:41Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Production of Categorical Data Verifying Differential Privacy: Conception and Applications to Machine Learning [0.0]
  Differential privacy is a formal definition that allows quantifying the privacy-utility trade-off. With the local DP (LDP) model, users can sanitize their data locally before transmitting it to the server. In all cases, we concluded that differentially private ML models achieve nearly the same utility metrics as non-private ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-02T12:50:14Z)
• Personalized PATE: Differential Privacy for Machine Learning with Individual Privacy Guarantees [1.2691047660244335]
  We propose three novel methods to support training an ML model with different personalized privacy guarantees within the training data. Our experiments show that our personalized privacy methods yield higher accuracy models than the non-personalized baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T20:16:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.