Calling for Backup: How Children Navigate Successive Robot Communication Failures
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00754v1
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 17:18:10 GMT
- Title: Calling for Backup: How Children Navigate Successive Robot Communication Failures
- Abstract summary: This study reproduces the successive robot failure paradigm of Liu et al. with child participants (N=59, ages 8-10) to examine how young users respond to repeated robot conversational errors.<n>Children adjusted their prompts, modified their verbal tone, and exhibited increasingly emotional non-verbal responses throughout successive errors.<n>These findings inform the design of more effective and developmentally appropriate human-robot interaction systems for young users.
- Score: 15.205829674404848
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: How do children respond to repeated robot errors? While prior research has examined adult reactions to successive robot errors, children's responses remain largely unexplored. In this study, we explore children's reactions to robot social errors and performance errors. For the latter, this study reproduces the successive robot failure paradigm of Liu et al. with child participants (N=59, ages 8-10) to examine how young users respond to repeated robot conversational errors. Participants interacted with a robot that failed to understand their prompts three times in succession, with their behavioral responses video-recorded and analyzed. We found both similarities and differences compared to adult responses from the original study. Like adults, children adjusted their prompts, modified their verbal tone, and exhibited increasingly emotional non-verbal responses throughout successive errors. However, children demonstrated more disengagement behaviors, including temporarily ignoring the robot or actively seeking an adult. Errors did not affect participants' perception of the robot, suggesting more flexible conversational expectations in children. These findings inform the design of more effective and developmentally appropriate human-robot interaction systems for young users.
Related papers
- Calming Robot Pitches? Exploring the Influence of Robot Voice Pitch on Children's Stress Levels [1.6379393441314496]
This study examined whether variations in robot speech pitch influence children's stress levels during a robot-guided game.<n>Twenty-seven Dutch children aged 8-12 years were randomly assigned to interact with a Zenbo Junior II robot using either a lower-pitched or a higher-pitched voice.<n>Stress levels, measured with an adapted version of CAM-S, increased during the game, confirming the stress-inducing nature of the task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-20T09:27:56Z) - Training Models to Detect Successive Robot Errors from Human Reactions [11.790205457987488]
This research uses machine learning to recognize stages of robot failure from human reactions.<n>In a study with 26 participants interacting with a robot that made repeated conversational errors, behavioral features were extracted from video data to train models.<n>The best model achieved 93.5% accuracy for detecting errors and 84.1% for classifying successive failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T07:25:44Z) - ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Conversations [18.151307410451796]
ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge provides a dataset of conversational robot failures during human-robot conversations.<n> dataset includes 16 hours of dyadic human-robot interactions, incorporating facial, speech, and head movement features.<n>Participants are invited to form teams and develop machine learning models that detect these failures using multimodal data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T18:21:45Z) - Human strategies for correcting `human-robot' errors during a laundry sorting task [3.9697512504288373]
Video analysis from 42 participants found speech patterns, including laughter, verbal expressions, and filler words, such as oh'' and ok''<n>Common strategies deployed when errors occurred, included correcting and teaching, taking responsibility, and displays of frustration.<n>An anthropomorphic robot may not be ideally suited to this kind of task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-11T09:53:36Z) - Robotic Backchanneling in Online Conversation Facilitation: A Cross-Generational Study [36.065558339939095]
Japan faces many challenges related to its aging society, including increasing rates of cognitive decline in the population and a shortage of caregivers.
Efforts have begun to explore solutions using artificial intelligence (AI), especially socially embodied intelligent agents and robots that can communicate with people.
We conducted a user study to evaluate a robot that functions as a facilitator for a group conversation protocol designed to prevent cognitive decline.
We modified the robot to use backchannelling, a natural human way of speaking, to increase receptiveness of the robot and enjoyment of the group conversation experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T13:08:43Z) - Human-Robot Interaction and Perceived Irrationality: A Study of Trust Dynamics and Error Acknowledgment [0.0]
This study systematically examines trust dynamics and system design by analyzing human reactions to robot failures.<n>We conducted a four-stage survey to explore how trust evolves throughout human-robot interactions.<n>Results indicate that trust in robotic systems significantly increased when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T11:00:11Z) - What Matters to You? Towards Visual Representation Alignment for Robot
Learning [81.30964736676103]
When operating in service of people, robots need to optimize rewards aligned with end-user preferences.
We propose Representation-Aligned Preference-based Learning (RAPL), a method for solving the visual representation alignment problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T23:04:07Z) - Robots-Dont-Cry: Understanding Falsely Anthropomorphic Utterances in
Dialog Systems [64.10696852552103]
Highly anthropomorphic responses might make users uncomfortable or implicitly deceive them into thinking they are interacting with a human.
We collect human ratings on the feasibility of approximately 900 two-turn dialogs sampled from 9 diverse data sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-22T12:10:44Z) - Social Assistive Robotics for Autistic Children [56.524774292536264]
The goal of the project is testing autistic children's interactions with the social robot NAO.
The innovative aspect of the project is that the children robot interaction will consider the children's emotions and specific features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-25T18:28:19Z) - CheerBots: Chatbots toward Empathy and Emotionusing Reinforcement
Learning [60.348822346249854]
This study presents a framework whereby several empathetic chatbots are based on understanding users' implied feelings and replying empathetically for multiple dialogue turns.
We call these chatbots CheerBots. CheerBots can be retrieval-based or generative-based and were finetuned by deep reinforcement learning.
To respond in an empathetic way, we develop a simulating agent, a Conceptual Human Model, as aids for CheerBots in training with considerations on changes in user's emotional states in the future to arouse sympathy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-08T07:44:47Z) - Lifelong Robotic Reinforcement Learning by Retaining Experiences [61.79346922421323]
Many multi-task reinforcement learning efforts assume the robot can collect data from all tasks at all times.
In this work, we study a practical sequential multi-task RL problem motivated by the practical constraints of physical robotic systems.
We derive an approach that effectively leverages the data and policies learned for previous tasks to cumulatively grow the robot's skill-set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-19T18:00:51Z) - Show Me What You Can Do: Capability Calibration on Reachable Workspace
for Human-Robot Collaboration [83.4081612443128]
We show that a short calibration using REMP can effectively bridge the gap between what a non-expert user thinks a robot can reach and the ground-truth.
We show that this calibration procedure not only results in better user perception, but also promotes more efficient human-robot collaborations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-06T09:14:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.