Scattering Cross Section Formula Derived From Macroscopic Model of Detectors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01625v1
• Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2026 18:08:22 GMT
• Title: Scattering Cross Section Formula Derived From Macroscopic Model of Detectors
• Authors: Rashi Kaimal, Roderich Tumulka,
• Abstract summary: We are concerned with the justification of the statement, commonly (explicitly or implicitly) used in quantum scattering theory.<n>We give two derivations of this formula, based on different macroscopic models of the detection process.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We are concerned with the justification of the statement, commonly (explicitly or implicitly) used in quantum scattering theory, that for a free non-relativistic quantum particle with initial wave function $Ψ_0(\boldsymbol{x})$, surrounded by detectors along a sphere of large radius $R$, the probability distribution of the detection time and place has asymptotic density (i.e., scattering cross section) $σ(\boldsymbol{x},t)= m^3 \hbar^{-3} R t^{-4} |\widehatΨ_0(m\boldsymbol{x}/\hbar t)|^2$ with $\widehatΨ_0$ the Fourier transform of $Ψ_0$. We give two derivations of this formula, based on different macroscopic models of the detection process. The first one consists of a negative imaginary potential of strength $λ>0$ in the detector volume (i.e., outside the sphere of radius $R$) in the limit $R\to\infty,λ\to 0, Rλ\to \infty$. The second one consists of repeated nearly-projective measurements of (approximately) the observable $1_{|\boldsymbol{x}|>R}$ at times $\mathscr{T},2\mathscr{T},3\mathscr{T},\ldots$ in the limit $R\to\infty,\mathscr{T}\to\infty,\mathscr{T}/R\to 0$; this setup is similar to that of the quantum Zeno effect, except that there one considers $\mathscr{T}\to 0$ instead of $\mathscr{T}\to\infty$. We also provide a comparison to Bohmian mechanics: while in the absence of detectors, the arrival times and places of the Bohmian trajectories on the sphere of radius $R$ have asymptotic distribution density given by the same formula as $σ$, their deviation from the detection times and places is not necessarily small, although it is small compared to $R$, so the effect of the presence of detectors on the particle can be neglected in the far-field regime. We also cover the generalization to surfaces with non-spherical shape, to the case of $N$ non-interacting particles, to time-dependent surfaces, and to the Dirac equation.

Related papers

• Dirac particles, spin and photons [51.56484100374058]
  We describe relativistic particles with spin as points moving in phase space $X=T* R1,3times C2_Ltimes C2_R$.<n>We show that taking into account the charges $q_sfv=pm 1$ of the fields $Psi_pm$ changes the definitions of the inner products and currents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T12:47:56Z)
• Cylindrically confined $H$ atom in magnetic field: variational cut-off factor [0.0]
  We consider the hydrogen atom confined within an impenetrable infinite cylindrical cavity of radius $rho_0$ in the presence of a constant magnetic field.<n>In the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, anchoring the nucleus to the geometric center of the cylinder, a physically meaningful 3-parametric trial function is used to determine the ground state energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T07:38:29Z)
• Provably learning a multi-head attention layer [55.2904547651831]
  Multi-head attention layer is one of the key components of the transformer architecture that sets it apart from traditional feed-forward models. In this work, we initiate the study of provably learning a multi-head attention layer from random examples. We prove computational lower bounds showing that in the worst case, exponential dependence on $m$ is unavoidable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T15:39:09Z)
• Quantum connection, charges and virtual particles [65.268245109828]
  A quantum bundle $L_hbar$ is endowed with a connection $A_hbar$ and its sections are standard wave functions $psi$ obeying the Schr"odinger equation. We will lift the bundles $L_Cpm$ and connection $A_hbar$ on them to the relativistic phase space $T*R3,1$ and couple them to the Dirac spinor bundle describing both particles and antiparticles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:27:09Z)
• A Unified Framework for Uniform Signal Recovery in Nonlinear Generative Compressed Sensing [68.80803866919123]
  Under nonlinear measurements, most prior results are non-uniform, i.e., they hold with high probability for a fixed $mathbfx*$ rather than for all $mathbfx*$ simultaneously. Our framework accommodates GCS with 1-bit/uniformly quantized observations and single index models as canonical examples. We also develop a concentration inequality that produces tighter bounds for product processes whose index sets have low metric entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T17:54:19Z)
• The Vector-Model Wavefunction: spatial description and wavepacket formation of quantum-mechanical angular momenta [0.0]
  In quantum mechanics, spatial wavefunctions describe distributions of a particle's position or momentum, but not of angular momentum $j$. We show that a spatial wavefunction, $j_m (phi,theta,chi)$ gives a useful description of quantum-mechanical angular momentum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T06:24:53Z)
• Learning a Single Neuron with Adversarial Label Noise via Gradient Descent [50.659479930171585]
  We study a function of the form $mathbfxmapstosigma(mathbfwcdotmathbfx)$ for monotone activations. The goal of the learner is to output a hypothesis vector $mathbfw$ that $F(mathbbw)=C, epsilon$ with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T17:55:43Z)
• Overparametrized linear dimensionality reductions: From projection pursuit to two-layer neural networks [8.74634652691576]
  We consider a cloud of $n data points in $mathbbRd$, consider all projections onto $m$-dimensional subspaces of $mathbbRd$ and, for each such projection, the empirical distribution of the projected points.<n>What does this collection of probability distributions look like when $n,d$ grow large?<n>We prove sharp bounds in terms of Kullback-Leibler divergence and R'enyi information dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T00:07:33Z)
• Uncertainties in Quantum Measurements: A Quantum Tomography [52.77024349608834]
  The observables associated with a quantum system $S$ form a non-commutative algebra $mathcal A_S$. It is assumed that a density matrix $rho$ can be determined from the expectation values of observables. Abelian algebras do not have inner automorphisms, so the measurement apparatus can determine mean values of observables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T16:29:53Z)
• Random matrices in service of ML footprint: ternary random features with no performance loss [55.30329197651178]
  We show that the eigenspectrum of $bf K$ is independent of the distribution of the i.i.d. entries of $bf w$. We propose a novel random technique, called Ternary Random Feature (TRF) The computation of the proposed random features requires no multiplication and a factor of $b$ less bits for storage compared to classical random features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T09:33:49Z)
• Stochastic behavior of outcome of Schur-Weyl duality measurement [45.41082277680607]
  We focus on the measurement defined by the decomposition based on Schur-Weyl duality on $n$ qubits. We derive various types of distribution including a kind of central limit when $n$ goes to infinity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T15:03:08Z)
• Quantum information measures of the Dirichlet and Neumann hyperspherical dots [0.0]
  $mathttd$-dimensional hyperspherical quantum dot with either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions (BCs) This paves the way to an efficient computation in either space of Shannon, R'enyi and Tsallis entropies, Onicescu energies and Fisher informations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T11:08:31Z)
• Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation for Absorbing Boundaries [0.0]
  We prove the uncertainty relation $sigma_T, sigma_E geq hbar/2$ between the time $T$ of detection of a quantum particle on the surface.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T12:04:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.